Cargando…

A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based gut lavage solutions are safe and effective, but require the intake of large volumes of fluid. The use of 2 L PEG plus 45 mL sodium phosphate (PEG2 plus NaP) was compared with 4 L PEG (PEG4) for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Suh Eun, Kim, Kyung-Jo, Eum, Jun Bum, Yang, Dong Hoon, Ye, Byong Duk, Byeon, Jeong-Sik, Myung, Seung-Jae, Yang, Suk-Kyun, Kim, Jin-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Gastroenterology; the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver; the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility; Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases; Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research; Korean Pancreatobiliary Association; Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3724030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898382
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2013.7.4.423
_version_ 1782476631103766528
author Bae, Suh Eun
Kim, Kyung-Jo
Eum, Jun Bum
Yang, Dong Hoon
Ye, Byong Duk
Byeon, Jeong-Sik
Myung, Seung-Jae
Yang, Suk-Kyun
Kim, Jin-Ho
author_facet Bae, Suh Eun
Kim, Kyung-Jo
Eum, Jun Bum
Yang, Dong Hoon
Ye, Byong Duk
Byeon, Jeong-Sik
Myung, Seung-Jae
Yang, Suk-Kyun
Kim, Jin-Ho
author_sort Bae, Suh Eun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based gut lavage solutions are safe and effective, but require the intake of large volumes of fluid. The use of 2 L PEG plus 45 mL sodium phosphate (PEG2 plus NaP) was compared with 4 L PEG (PEG4) for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to the PEG2 plus NaP group or PEG4 group between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2010. One hundred and thirty patients were included in the PEG2 plus NaP group, and 141 patients in the PEG4 group. RESULTS: The qualities of the bowel preparation, based on the Ottawa scale were not significantly different between the groups (4.8±2.25 for the PEG2 plus NaP group vs. 5.11±2.26 for the PEG4). In addition, there were no significant differences in side effects. Laboratory findings after bowel preparation, including electrolyte, phosphorus and creatinine levels, were within the normal ranges in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PEG2 plus NaP provides good cleansing that is similar to PEG4, but with a lower volume. However, because PEG2 plus NaP can cause serious side effects such as calcium deposition in the kidneys (i.e., nephrocalcinosis), this solution might be considered for the outpatients who cannot tolerate PEG4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3724030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society of Gastroenterology; the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver; the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility; Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases; Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research; Korean Pancreatobiliary Association; Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37240302013-07-29 A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial Bae, Suh Eun Kim, Kyung-Jo Eum, Jun Bum Yang, Dong Hoon Ye, Byong Duk Byeon, Jeong-Sik Myung, Seung-Jae Yang, Suk-Kyun Kim, Jin-Ho Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based gut lavage solutions are safe and effective, but require the intake of large volumes of fluid. The use of 2 L PEG plus 45 mL sodium phosphate (PEG2 plus NaP) was compared with 4 L PEG (PEG4) for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to the PEG2 plus NaP group or PEG4 group between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2010. One hundred and thirty patients were included in the PEG2 plus NaP group, and 141 patients in the PEG4 group. RESULTS: The qualities of the bowel preparation, based on the Ottawa scale were not significantly different between the groups (4.8±2.25 for the PEG2 plus NaP group vs. 5.11±2.26 for the PEG4). In addition, there were no significant differences in side effects. Laboratory findings after bowel preparation, including electrolyte, phosphorus and creatinine levels, were within the normal ranges in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PEG2 plus NaP provides good cleansing that is similar to PEG4, but with a lower volume. However, because PEG2 plus NaP can cause serious side effects such as calcium deposition in the kidneys (i.e., nephrocalcinosis), this solution might be considered for the outpatients who cannot tolerate PEG4. The Korean Society of Gastroenterology; the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver; the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility; Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases; Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research; Korean Pancreatobiliary Association; Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2013-07 2013-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3724030/ /pubmed/23898382 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2013.7.4.423 Text en Copyright © 2013 by the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bae, Suh Eun
Kim, Kyung-Jo
Eum, Jun Bum
Yang, Dong Hoon
Ye, Byong Duk
Byeon, Jeong-Sik
Myung, Seung-Jae
Yang, Suk-Kyun
Kim, Jin-Ho
A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_fullStr A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_short A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_sort comparison of 2 l of polyethylene glycol and 45 ml of sodium phosphate versus 4 l of polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing: a prospective randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3724030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898382
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2013.7.4.423
work_keys_str_mv AT baesuheun acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kimkyungjo acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT eumjunbum acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT yangdonghoon acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT yebyongduk acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT byeonjeongsik acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT myungseungjae acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT yangsukkyun acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kimjinho acomparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT baesuheun comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kimkyungjo comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT eumjunbum comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT yangdonghoon comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT yebyongduk comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT byeonjeongsik comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT myungseungjae comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT yangsukkyun comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kimjinho comparisonof2lofpolyethyleneglycoland45mlofsodiumphosphateversus4lofpolyethyleneglycolforbowelcleansingaprospectiverandomizedtrial