Cargando…

Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts

This work is about the setup of an in vitro system to report low-dose of X-rays as measured as cytogenetic damage. Q- and multicolor FISH (m-FISH), for telomere length and chromosome instability analysis, respectively, were compared to evaluate their sensitivity in the low-dose range in human primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieri, D., Berardinelli, F., Antoccia, A., Tanzarella, C., Sgura, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00141
_version_ 1782476784875339776
author Nieri, D.
Berardinelli, F.
Antoccia, A.
Tanzarella, C.
Sgura, Antonella
author_facet Nieri, D.
Berardinelli, F.
Antoccia, A.
Tanzarella, C.
Sgura, Antonella
author_sort Nieri, D.
collection PubMed
description This work is about the setup of an in vitro system to report low-dose of X-rays as measured as cytogenetic damage. Q- and multicolor FISH (m-FISH), for telomere length and chromosome instability analysis, respectively, were compared to evaluate their sensitivity in the low-dose range in human primary fibroblasts. No telomere length modulation was observed up to 1 Gy in cycling fibroblasts, though reported for high doses, by that frustrating the purpose of using it as a low-exposure marker. To date the m-FISH is the best setup for the assessment of the chromosome structural damage: it allows stable and instable aberrations to be detected all over the karyotype. Stable ones such as balanced translocations, are not eliminated due to cell-cycle as unstable ones, so they are considered transmissible markers for retrospective dosimetry. The induction of chromosome damage showed a clear dependence on dose delivered; unstable aberrations were demonstrated after doses of 0.1 Gy, and stable aberrations after doses higher than 0.5 Gy. Summarizing, q-FISH is unfit to report low exposures while m-FISH provides better results: unstable aberrations are sensible short-term reporters, while stable ones long report exposures but with a higher induction threshold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3725399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37253992013-08-01 Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts Nieri, D. Berardinelli, F. Antoccia, A. Tanzarella, C. Sgura, Antonella Front Genet Genetics This work is about the setup of an in vitro system to report low-dose of X-rays as measured as cytogenetic damage. Q- and multicolor FISH (m-FISH), for telomere length and chromosome instability analysis, respectively, were compared to evaluate their sensitivity in the low-dose range in human primary fibroblasts. No telomere length modulation was observed up to 1 Gy in cycling fibroblasts, though reported for high doses, by that frustrating the purpose of using it as a low-exposure marker. To date the m-FISH is the best setup for the assessment of the chromosome structural damage: it allows stable and instable aberrations to be detected all over the karyotype. Stable ones such as balanced translocations, are not eliminated due to cell-cycle as unstable ones, so they are considered transmissible markers for retrospective dosimetry. The induction of chromosome damage showed a clear dependence on dose delivered; unstable aberrations were demonstrated after doses of 0.1 Gy, and stable aberrations after doses higher than 0.5 Gy. Summarizing, q-FISH is unfit to report low exposures while m-FISH provides better results: unstable aberrations are sensible short-term reporters, while stable ones long report exposures but with a higher induction threshold. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3725399/ /pubmed/23908663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00141 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nieri, Berardinelli, Antoccia, Tanzarella and Sgura. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Genetics
Nieri, D.
Berardinelli, F.
Antoccia, A.
Tanzarella, C.
Sgura, Antonella
Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
title Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
title_full Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
title_fullStr Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
title_short Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
title_sort comparison between two fish techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose x-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00141
work_keys_str_mv AT nierid comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts
AT berardinellif comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts
AT antocciaa comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts
AT tanzarellac comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts
AT sguraantonella comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts