Cargando…
Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts
This work is about the setup of an in vitro system to report low-dose of X-rays as measured as cytogenetic damage. Q- and multicolor FISH (m-FISH), for telomere length and chromosome instability analysis, respectively, were compared to evaluate their sensitivity in the low-dose range in human primar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00141 |
_version_ | 1782476784875339776 |
---|---|
author | Nieri, D. Berardinelli, F. Antoccia, A. Tanzarella, C. Sgura, Antonella |
author_facet | Nieri, D. Berardinelli, F. Antoccia, A. Tanzarella, C. Sgura, Antonella |
author_sort | Nieri, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work is about the setup of an in vitro system to report low-dose of X-rays as measured as cytogenetic damage. Q- and multicolor FISH (m-FISH), for telomere length and chromosome instability analysis, respectively, were compared to evaluate their sensitivity in the low-dose range in human primary fibroblasts. No telomere length modulation was observed up to 1 Gy in cycling fibroblasts, though reported for high doses, by that frustrating the purpose of using it as a low-exposure marker. To date the m-FISH is the best setup for the assessment of the chromosome structural damage: it allows stable and instable aberrations to be detected all over the karyotype. Stable ones such as balanced translocations, are not eliminated due to cell-cycle as unstable ones, so they are considered transmissible markers for retrospective dosimetry. The induction of chromosome damage showed a clear dependence on dose delivered; unstable aberrations were demonstrated after doses of 0.1 Gy, and stable aberrations after doses higher than 0.5 Gy. Summarizing, q-FISH is unfit to report low exposures while m-FISH provides better results: unstable aberrations are sensible short-term reporters, while stable ones long report exposures but with a higher induction threshold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3725399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37253992013-08-01 Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts Nieri, D. Berardinelli, F. Antoccia, A. Tanzarella, C. Sgura, Antonella Front Genet Genetics This work is about the setup of an in vitro system to report low-dose of X-rays as measured as cytogenetic damage. Q- and multicolor FISH (m-FISH), for telomere length and chromosome instability analysis, respectively, were compared to evaluate their sensitivity in the low-dose range in human primary fibroblasts. No telomere length modulation was observed up to 1 Gy in cycling fibroblasts, though reported for high doses, by that frustrating the purpose of using it as a low-exposure marker. To date the m-FISH is the best setup for the assessment of the chromosome structural damage: it allows stable and instable aberrations to be detected all over the karyotype. Stable ones such as balanced translocations, are not eliminated due to cell-cycle as unstable ones, so they are considered transmissible markers for retrospective dosimetry. The induction of chromosome damage showed a clear dependence on dose delivered; unstable aberrations were demonstrated after doses of 0.1 Gy, and stable aberrations after doses higher than 0.5 Gy. Summarizing, q-FISH is unfit to report low exposures while m-FISH provides better results: unstable aberrations are sensible short-term reporters, while stable ones long report exposures but with a higher induction threshold. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3725399/ /pubmed/23908663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00141 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nieri, Berardinelli, Antoccia, Tanzarella and Sgura. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Nieri, D. Berardinelli, F. Antoccia, A. Tanzarella, C. Sgura, Antonella Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts |
title | Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts |
title_full | Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts |
title_fullStr | Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts |
title_short | Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts |
title_sort | comparison between two fish techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose x-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nierid comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts AT berardinellif comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts AT antocciaa comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts AT tanzarellac comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts AT sguraantonella comparisonbetweentwofishtechniquesintheinvitrostudyofcytogeneticmarkersforlowdosexrayexposureinhumanprimaryfibroblasts |