Cargando…

Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey

This study examined psychologists’ views and practices regarding diagnostic classification systems for mental and behavioral disorders so as to inform the development of the ICD-11 by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO and the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) conducted a m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Spencer C., Reed, Geoffrey M., Roberts, Michael C., Esparza, Patricia, Watts, Ann D., Correia, João Mendonça, Ritchie, Pierre, Maj, Mario, Saxena, Shekhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.804189
_version_ 1782476807270825984
author Evans, Spencer C.
Reed, Geoffrey M.
Roberts, Michael C.
Esparza, Patricia
Watts, Ann D.
Correia, João Mendonça
Ritchie, Pierre
Maj, Mario
Saxena, Shekhar
author_facet Evans, Spencer C.
Reed, Geoffrey M.
Roberts, Michael C.
Esparza, Patricia
Watts, Ann D.
Correia, João Mendonça
Ritchie, Pierre
Maj, Mario
Saxena, Shekhar
author_sort Evans, Spencer C.
collection PubMed
description This study examined psychologists’ views and practices regarding diagnostic classification systems for mental and behavioral disorders so as to inform the development of the ICD-11 by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO and the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) conducted a multilingual survey of 2155 psychologists from 23 countries, recruited through their national psychological associations. Sixty percent of global psychologists routinely used a formal classification system, with ICD-10 used most frequently by 51% and DSM-IV by 44%. Psychologists viewed informing treatment decisions and facilitating communication as the most important purposes of classification, and preferred flexible diagnostic guidelines to strict criteria. Clinicians favorably evaluated most diagnostic categories, but identified a number of problematic diagnoses. Substantial percentages reported problems with crosscultural applicability and cultural bias, especially among psychologists outside the USA and Europe. Findings underscore the priority of clinical utility and professional and cultural differences in international psychology. Implications for ICD-11 development and dissemination are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3725658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37256582013-07-31 Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey Evans, Spencer C. Reed, Geoffrey M. Roberts, Michael C. Esparza, Patricia Watts, Ann D. Correia, João Mendonça Ritchie, Pierre Maj, Mario Saxena, Shekhar Int J Psychol Research Article This study examined psychologists’ views and practices regarding diagnostic classification systems for mental and behavioral disorders so as to inform the development of the ICD-11 by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO and the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) conducted a multilingual survey of 2155 psychologists from 23 countries, recruited through their national psychological associations. Sixty percent of global psychologists routinely used a formal classification system, with ICD-10 used most frequently by 51% and DSM-IV by 44%. Psychologists viewed informing treatment decisions and facilitating communication as the most important purposes of classification, and preferred flexible diagnostic guidelines to strict criteria. Clinicians favorably evaluated most diagnostic categories, but identified a number of problematic diagnoses. Substantial percentages reported problems with crosscultural applicability and cultural bias, especially among psychologists outside the USA and Europe. Findings underscore the priority of clinical utility and professional and cultural differences in international psychology. Implications for ICD-11 development and dissemination are discussed. Taylor & Francis 2013-06-10 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3725658/ /pubmed/23750927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.804189 Text en © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Routledge. http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Research Article
Evans, Spencer C.
Reed, Geoffrey M.
Roberts, Michael C.
Esparza, Patricia
Watts, Ann D.
Correia, João Mendonça
Ritchie, Pierre
Maj, Mario
Saxena, Shekhar
Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey
title Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey
title_full Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey
title_fullStr Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey
title_full_unstemmed Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey
title_short Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey
title_sort psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: results from the who-iupsys global survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3725658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.804189
work_keys_str_mv AT evansspencerc psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT reedgeoffreym psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT robertsmichaelc psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT esparzapatricia psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT wattsannd psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT correiajoaomendonca psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT ritchiepierre psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT majmario psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey
AT saxenashekhar psychologistsperspectivesonthediagnosticclassificationofmentaldisordersresultsfromthewhoiupsysglobalsurvey