Cargando…

Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification

BACKGROUND: Enzyme end-product inhibition is a major challenge in the hydrolysis of lignocellulose at a high dry matter consistency. β-glucosidases (BGs) hydrolyze cellobiose into two molecules of glucose, thereby relieving the product inhibition of cellobiohydrolases (CBHs). However, BG inhibition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teugjas, Hele, Väljamäe, Priit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3726394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23883540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-105
_version_ 1782278632068087808
author Teugjas, Hele
Väljamäe, Priit
author_facet Teugjas, Hele
Väljamäe, Priit
author_sort Teugjas, Hele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enzyme end-product inhibition is a major challenge in the hydrolysis of lignocellulose at a high dry matter consistency. β-glucosidases (BGs) hydrolyze cellobiose into two molecules of glucose, thereby relieving the product inhibition of cellobiohydrolases (CBHs). However, BG inhibition by glucose will eventually lead to the accumulation of cellobiose and the inhibition of CBHs. Therefore, the kinetic properties of candidate BGs must meet the requirements determined by both the kinetic properties of CBHs and the set-up of the hydrolysis process. RESULTS: The kinetics of cellobiose hydrolysis and glucose inhibition of thermostable BGs from Acremonium thermophilum (AtBG3) and Thermoascus aurantiacus (TaBG3) was studied and compared to Aspergillus sp. BG purified from Novozyme®188 (N188BG). The most efficient cellobiose hydrolysis was achieved with TaBG3, followed by AtBG3 and N188BG, whereas the enzyme most sensitive to glucose inhibition was AtBG3, followed by TaBG3 and N188BG. The use of higher temperatures had an advantage in both increasing the catalytic efficiency and relieving the product inhibition of the enzymes. Our data, together with data from a literature survey, revealed a trade-off between the strength of glucose inhibition and the affinity for cellobiose; therefore, glucose-tolerant BGs tend to have low specificity constants for cellobiose hydrolysis. However, although a high specificity constant is always an advantage, in separate hydrolysis and fermentation, the priority may be given to a higher tolerance to glucose inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity constant for cellobiose hydrolysis and the inhibition constant for glucose are the most important kinetic parameters in selecting BGs to support cellulases in cellulose hydrolysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3726394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37263942013-07-31 Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification Teugjas, Hele Väljamäe, Priit Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Enzyme end-product inhibition is a major challenge in the hydrolysis of lignocellulose at a high dry matter consistency. β-glucosidases (BGs) hydrolyze cellobiose into two molecules of glucose, thereby relieving the product inhibition of cellobiohydrolases (CBHs). However, BG inhibition by glucose will eventually lead to the accumulation of cellobiose and the inhibition of CBHs. Therefore, the kinetic properties of candidate BGs must meet the requirements determined by both the kinetic properties of CBHs and the set-up of the hydrolysis process. RESULTS: The kinetics of cellobiose hydrolysis and glucose inhibition of thermostable BGs from Acremonium thermophilum (AtBG3) and Thermoascus aurantiacus (TaBG3) was studied and compared to Aspergillus sp. BG purified from Novozyme®188 (N188BG). The most efficient cellobiose hydrolysis was achieved with TaBG3, followed by AtBG3 and N188BG, whereas the enzyme most sensitive to glucose inhibition was AtBG3, followed by TaBG3 and N188BG. The use of higher temperatures had an advantage in both increasing the catalytic efficiency and relieving the product inhibition of the enzymes. Our data, together with data from a literature survey, revealed a trade-off between the strength of glucose inhibition and the affinity for cellobiose; therefore, glucose-tolerant BGs tend to have low specificity constants for cellobiose hydrolysis. However, although a high specificity constant is always an advantage, in separate hydrolysis and fermentation, the priority may be given to a higher tolerance to glucose inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity constant for cellobiose hydrolysis and the inhibition constant for glucose are the most important kinetic parameters in selecting BGs to support cellulases in cellulose hydrolysis. BioMed Central 2013-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3726394/ /pubmed/23883540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-105 Text en Copyright © 2013 Teugjas and Väljamäe; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Teugjas, Hele
Väljamäe, Priit
Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification
title Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification
title_full Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification
title_fullStr Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification
title_full_unstemmed Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification
title_short Selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification
title_sort selecting β-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3726394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23883540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-105
work_keys_str_mv AT teugjashele selectingbglucosidasestosupportcellulasesincellulosesaccharification
AT valjamaepriit selectingbglucosidasestosupportcellulasesincellulosesaccharification