Cargando…

Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty

The manipulation of attention can produce mismatch negativity-like components that are not necessarily connected to the unintentional sensory registration of the violation of probability-based regularity. For clinical purposes, attentional bias should be quantified because it can vary substantially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kremláček, Jan, Kuba, Miroslav, Kubová, Zuzana, Langrová, Jana, Szanyi, Jana, Vít, František, Bednář, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3726860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00411
_version_ 1782278721665761280
author Kremláček, Jan
Kuba, Miroslav
Kubová, Zuzana
Langrová, Jana
Szanyi, Jana
Vít, František
Bednář, Michal
author_facet Kremláček, Jan
Kuba, Miroslav
Kubová, Zuzana
Langrová, Jana
Szanyi, Jana
Vít, František
Bednář, Michal
author_sort Kremláček, Jan
collection PubMed
description The manipulation of attention can produce mismatch negativity-like components that are not necessarily connected to the unintentional sensory registration of the violation of probability-based regularity. For clinical purposes, attentional bias should be quantified because it can vary substantially among subjects and can decrease the specificity of the examination. This experiment targets the role of attention in the generation of visual mismatch negativity (vMMN). The visual regularity was generated by a sequence of two radial motions while subjects focused on visual tasks in the central part of the display. Attentional load was systematically varied and had three levels, no-load, easy, and difficult. Rare, deviant, and frequent standard motions were presented with a 10/60 ratio in oddball sequences. Data from 12 subjects was recorded from 64 channels and processed. vMMN was identified within the interval of 142–198 ms. The mean amplitude was evaluated during the aforementioned interval in the parietal and fronto-central regions. A general linear model for repeated measures was applied to the mean amplitude with a three-factor design and showed a significant difference [F((1, 11)) = 17.40, p = 0.002] between standard and deviant stimuli and between regions [F((1, 11)) = 8.40, p = 0.01]; however, no significant effect of the task [F((2, 22)) = 1.26, p = 0.30] was observed. The unintentional detection of irregularity during the processing of the visual motion was independent of the attentional load associated with handling the central visual task. The experiment did not demonstrate an effect of attentional load manipulation on mismatch negativity (MMN) induced by the motion-sequence, which supports the clinical utility of this examination. However, used stimulation paradigm should be further optimized to generate mismatch negativity that is stable enough to be usable not only for group comparisons but also for a single subject assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3726860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37268602013-08-01 Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty Kremláček, Jan Kuba, Miroslav Kubová, Zuzana Langrová, Jana Szanyi, Jana Vít, František Bednář, Michal Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The manipulation of attention can produce mismatch negativity-like components that are not necessarily connected to the unintentional sensory registration of the violation of probability-based regularity. For clinical purposes, attentional bias should be quantified because it can vary substantially among subjects and can decrease the specificity of the examination. This experiment targets the role of attention in the generation of visual mismatch negativity (vMMN). The visual regularity was generated by a sequence of two radial motions while subjects focused on visual tasks in the central part of the display. Attentional load was systematically varied and had three levels, no-load, easy, and difficult. Rare, deviant, and frequent standard motions were presented with a 10/60 ratio in oddball sequences. Data from 12 subjects was recorded from 64 channels and processed. vMMN was identified within the interval of 142–198 ms. The mean amplitude was evaluated during the aforementioned interval in the parietal and fronto-central regions. A general linear model for repeated measures was applied to the mean amplitude with a three-factor design and showed a significant difference [F((1, 11)) = 17.40, p = 0.002] between standard and deviant stimuli and between regions [F((1, 11)) = 8.40, p = 0.01]; however, no significant effect of the task [F((2, 22)) = 1.26, p = 0.30] was observed. The unintentional detection of irregularity during the processing of the visual motion was independent of the attentional load associated with handling the central visual task. The experiment did not demonstrate an effect of attentional load manipulation on mismatch negativity (MMN) induced by the motion-sequence, which supports the clinical utility of this examination. However, used stimulation paradigm should be further optimized to generate mismatch negativity that is stable enough to be usable not only for group comparisons but also for a single subject assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3726860/ /pubmed/23908621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00411 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kremláček, Kuba, Kubová, Langrová, Szanyi, Vít and Bednář. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kremláček, Jan
Kuba, Miroslav
Kubová, Zuzana
Langrová, Jana
Szanyi, Jana
Vít, František
Bednář, Michal
Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty
title Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty
title_full Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty
title_fullStr Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty
title_full_unstemmed Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty
title_short Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty
title_sort visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3726860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00411
work_keys_str_mv AT kremlacekjan visualmismatchnegativityinthedorsalstreamisindependentofconcurrentvisualtaskdifficulty
AT kubamiroslav visualmismatchnegativityinthedorsalstreamisindependentofconcurrentvisualtaskdifficulty
AT kubovazuzana visualmismatchnegativityinthedorsalstreamisindependentofconcurrentvisualtaskdifficulty
AT langrovajana visualmismatchnegativityinthedorsalstreamisindependentofconcurrentvisualtaskdifficulty
AT szanyijana visualmismatchnegativityinthedorsalstreamisindependentofconcurrentvisualtaskdifficulty
AT vitfrantisek visualmismatchnegativityinthedorsalstreamisindependentofconcurrentvisualtaskdifficulty
AT bednarmichal visualmismatchnegativityinthedorsalstreamisindependentofconcurrentvisualtaskdifficulty