Cargando…

Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The Fas rs180082 polymorphism has been reported to be associated with cervical cancer susceptibility, yet the results of these previous results have been inconsistent or controversial. The objective of this study was to explore whether the Fas rs180082 polymorphism confers susceptibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xu, Mo, Wuning, Peng, Qiliu, Su, Xiandu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23865866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-14-71
_version_ 1782278802216321024
author Chen, Xu
Mo, Wuning
Peng, Qiliu
Su, Xiandu
author_facet Chen, Xu
Mo, Wuning
Peng, Qiliu
Su, Xiandu
author_sort Chen, Xu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Fas rs180082 polymorphism has been reported to be associated with cervical cancer susceptibility, yet the results of these previous results have been inconsistent or controversial. The objective of this study was to explore whether the Fas rs180082 polymorphism confers susceptibility to cervical cancer. METHODS: The relevant studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Elsevier Science Direct and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) until July 2012. The association between the Fas rs180082 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk was assessed by odds ratios (ORs) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 7 case–control studies were eventually identified. We found no association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and cervical cancer susceptibility in overall population (G versus A: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.99-1.07, P = 0.197; AG + GG versus AA: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98-1.09, P = 0.176; GG versus AA + AG: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84–1.31, P = 0.701). In subgroup analysis, similar results were found in Asian (G versus A: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.97–1.15, P = 0.195; AG + GG versus AA: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.98–1.19, P = 0.176; GG versus AA + AG: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.51–1.84, P = 0.935) and African (G versus A: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.97-1.15, P = 0.195; AG + GG versus AA: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.91–1.07, P = 0.739; GG versus AA + AG: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.94–1.25, P = 0.745). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis has shown that there is a lack of association of the Fas rs180082 polymorphisms with cervical cancer susceptibility. However, larger scale primary studies with the consideration of gene–gene and gene–environment interactions are still required to further evaluate the interaction of Fas rs180082 polymorphism with cervical cancer susceptibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3728080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37280802013-07-31 Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis Chen, Xu Mo, Wuning Peng, Qiliu Su, Xiandu BMC Med Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: The Fas rs180082 polymorphism has been reported to be associated with cervical cancer susceptibility, yet the results of these previous results have been inconsistent or controversial. The objective of this study was to explore whether the Fas rs180082 polymorphism confers susceptibility to cervical cancer. METHODS: The relevant studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Elsevier Science Direct and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) until July 2012. The association between the Fas rs180082 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk was assessed by odds ratios (ORs) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 7 case–control studies were eventually identified. We found no association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and cervical cancer susceptibility in overall population (G versus A: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.99-1.07, P = 0.197; AG + GG versus AA: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98-1.09, P = 0.176; GG versus AA + AG: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84–1.31, P = 0.701). In subgroup analysis, similar results were found in Asian (G versus A: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.97–1.15, P = 0.195; AG + GG versus AA: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.98–1.19, P = 0.176; GG versus AA + AG: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.51–1.84, P = 0.935) and African (G versus A: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.97-1.15, P = 0.195; AG + GG versus AA: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.91–1.07, P = 0.739; GG versus AA + AG: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.94–1.25, P = 0.745). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis has shown that there is a lack of association of the Fas rs180082 polymorphisms with cervical cancer susceptibility. However, larger scale primary studies with the consideration of gene–gene and gene–environment interactions are still required to further evaluate the interaction of Fas rs180082 polymorphism with cervical cancer susceptibility. BioMed Central 2013-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3728080/ /pubmed/23865866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-14-71 Text en Copyright © 2013 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Xu
Mo, Wuning
Peng, Qiliu
Su, Xiandu
Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis
title Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis
title_full Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis
title_fullStr Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis
title_short Lack of association between Fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis
title_sort lack of association between fas rs180082 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer: an update by meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23865866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-14-71
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxu lackofassociationbetweenfasrs180082polymorphismandriskofcervicalcanceranupdatebymetaanalysis
AT mowuning lackofassociationbetweenfasrs180082polymorphismandriskofcervicalcanceranupdatebymetaanalysis
AT pengqiliu lackofassociationbetweenfasrs180082polymorphismandriskofcervicalcanceranupdatebymetaanalysis
AT suxiandu lackofassociationbetweenfasrs180082polymorphismandriskofcervicalcanceranupdatebymetaanalysis