Cargando…

Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Atypical antipsychotic drugs may have low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects in delirious patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability between quetiapine and haloperidol in controlling delirious behavior. METHODS: A 7-day prospective, double-blind, ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maneeton, Benchalak, Maneeton, Narong, Srisurapanont, Manit, Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23926422
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S45575
_version_ 1782278833007755264
author Maneeton, Benchalak
Maneeton, Narong
Srisurapanont, Manit
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
author_facet Maneeton, Benchalak
Maneeton, Narong
Srisurapanont, Manit
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
author_sort Maneeton, Benchalak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atypical antipsychotic drugs may have low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects in delirious patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability between quetiapine and haloperidol in controlling delirious behavior. METHODS: A 7-day prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2009 to April 2011 in medically ill patients with delirium. Measures used for daily assessment included the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and total sleep time. The Clinical Global Impression, Improvement (CGI–I) and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson– Angus Scale were applied daily. The primary outcome was the DRS-R-98 severity scores. The data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects (35 males and 17 females) were randomized to receive 25–100 mg/day of quetiapine (n = 24) or 0.5–2.0 mg/day of haloperidol (n = 28). Mean (standard deviation) doses of quetiapine and haloperidol were 67.6 (9.7) and 0.8 (0.3) mg/day, respectively. Over the trial period, means (standard deviation) of the DRS-R-98 severity scores were not significantly different between the quetiapine and haloperidol groups (−22.9 [6.9] versus −21.7 [6.7]; P = 0.59). The DRS-R-98 noncognitive and cognitive subscale scores were not significantly different. At end point, the response and remission rates, the total sleep time, and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson–Angus scores were also not significantly different between groups. Hypersomnia was common in the quetiapine-treated patients (33.3%), but not significantly higher than that in the haloperidol-treated group (21.4%). LIMITATIONS: Patients were excluded if they were not able to take oral medications, and the sample size was small. CONCLUSION: Low-dose quetiapine and haloperidol may be equally effective and safe for controlling delirium symptoms. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00954603.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3728270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37282702013-08-07 Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial Maneeton, Benchalak Maneeton, Narong Srisurapanont, Manit Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Atypical antipsychotic drugs may have low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects in delirious patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability between quetiapine and haloperidol in controlling delirious behavior. METHODS: A 7-day prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2009 to April 2011 in medically ill patients with delirium. Measures used for daily assessment included the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and total sleep time. The Clinical Global Impression, Improvement (CGI–I) and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson– Angus Scale were applied daily. The primary outcome was the DRS-R-98 severity scores. The data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects (35 males and 17 females) were randomized to receive 25–100 mg/day of quetiapine (n = 24) or 0.5–2.0 mg/day of haloperidol (n = 28). Mean (standard deviation) doses of quetiapine and haloperidol were 67.6 (9.7) and 0.8 (0.3) mg/day, respectively. Over the trial period, means (standard deviation) of the DRS-R-98 severity scores were not significantly different between the quetiapine and haloperidol groups (−22.9 [6.9] versus −21.7 [6.7]; P = 0.59). The DRS-R-98 noncognitive and cognitive subscale scores were not significantly different. At end point, the response and remission rates, the total sleep time, and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson–Angus scores were also not significantly different between groups. Hypersomnia was common in the quetiapine-treated patients (33.3%), but not significantly higher than that in the haloperidol-treated group (21.4%). LIMITATIONS: Patients were excluded if they were not able to take oral medications, and the sample size was small. CONCLUSION: Low-dose quetiapine and haloperidol may be equally effective and safe for controlling delirium symptoms. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00954603. Dove Medical Press 2013-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3728270/ /pubmed/23926422 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S45575 Text en © 2013 Maneeton et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Maneeton, Benchalak
Maneeton, Narong
Srisurapanont, Manit
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
title Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
title_full Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
title_short Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
title_sort quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23926422
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S45575
work_keys_str_mv AT maneetonbenchalak quetiapineversushaloperidolinthetreatmentofdeliriumadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maneetonnarong quetiapineversushaloperidolinthetreatmentofdeliriumadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT srisurapanontmanit quetiapineversushaloperidolinthetreatmentofdeliriumadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chittawatanaratkaweesak quetiapineversushaloperidolinthetreatmentofdeliriumadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial