Cargando…
Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods
There is no scientific consensus on the optimal specification of the time trade-off (TTO) task. As a consequence, studies using TTO to value health states may share the core element of trading length of life for quality of life, but can differ considerably on many other elements. While this plurifor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23900665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x |
_version_ | 1782278859646828544 |
---|---|
author | Attema, Arthur E. Edelaar-Peeters, Yvette Versteegh, Matthijs M. Stolk, Elly A. |
author_facet | Attema, Arthur E. Edelaar-Peeters, Yvette Versteegh, Matthijs M. Stolk, Elly A. |
author_sort | Attema, Arthur E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is no scientific consensus on the optimal specification of the time trade-off (TTO) task. As a consequence, studies using TTO to value health states may share the core element of trading length of life for quality of life, but can differ considerably on many other elements. While this pluriformity in specifications advances the understanding of TTO from a methodological point of view, it also results in incomparable health state values. Health state values are applied in health technology assessments, and in that context comparability of information is desired. In this article, we discuss several alternative specifications of TTO presented in the literature. The defining elements of these specifications are identified as being either methodological, procedural or analytical in nature. Where possible, it is indicated how these elements affect health state values (i.e., upward or downward). Finally, a checklist for TTO studies is presented, which incorporates a list of choices to be made by researchers who wish to perform a TTO task. Such a checklist enables other researchers to align methodologies in order to enhance the comparability of health state values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3728453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37284532013-08-01 Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods Attema, Arthur E. Edelaar-Peeters, Yvette Versteegh, Matthijs M. Stolk, Elly A. Eur J Health Econ Original Paper There is no scientific consensus on the optimal specification of the time trade-off (TTO) task. As a consequence, studies using TTO to value health states may share the core element of trading length of life for quality of life, but can differ considerably on many other elements. While this pluriformity in specifications advances the understanding of TTO from a methodological point of view, it also results in incomparable health state values. Health state values are applied in health technology assessments, and in that context comparability of information is desired. In this article, we discuss several alternative specifications of TTO presented in the literature. The defining elements of these specifications are identified as being either methodological, procedural or analytical in nature. Where possible, it is indicated how these elements affect health state values (i.e., upward or downward). Finally, a checklist for TTO studies is presented, which incorporates a list of choices to be made by researchers who wish to perform a TTO task. Such a checklist enables other researchers to align methodologies in order to enhance the comparability of health state values. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-07-31 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3728453/ /pubmed/23900665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Attema, Arthur E. Edelaar-Peeters, Yvette Versteegh, Matthijs M. Stolk, Elly A. Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
title | Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
title_full | Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
title_fullStr | Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
title_short | Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
title_sort | time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23900665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT attemaarthure timetradeoffonemethodologydifferentmethods AT edelaarpeetersyvette timetradeoffonemethodologydifferentmethods AT versteeghmatthijsm timetradeoffonemethodologydifferentmethods AT stolkellya timetradeoffonemethodologydifferentmethods |