Cargando…

Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features

The complex task of assessing the veracity of a statement is thought to activate uniquely distributed brain regions based on whether a subject believes or disbelieves a given assertion. In the current work, we present parallel machine learning methods for predicting a subject's decision respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Douglas, Pamela K., Lau, Edward, Anderson, Ariana, Head, Austin, Kerr, Wesley, Wollner, Margalit, Moyer, Daniel, Li, Wei, Durnhofer, Mike, Bramen, Jennifer, Cohen, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00392
_version_ 1782278867001540608
author Douglas, Pamela K.
Lau, Edward
Anderson, Ariana
Head, Austin
Kerr, Wesley
Wollner, Margalit
Moyer, Daniel
Li, Wei
Durnhofer, Mike
Bramen, Jennifer
Cohen, Mark S.
author_facet Douglas, Pamela K.
Lau, Edward
Anderson, Ariana
Head, Austin
Kerr, Wesley
Wollner, Margalit
Moyer, Daniel
Li, Wei
Durnhofer, Mike
Bramen, Jennifer
Cohen, Mark S.
author_sort Douglas, Pamela K.
collection PubMed
description The complex task of assessing the veracity of a statement is thought to activate uniquely distributed brain regions based on whether a subject believes or disbelieves a given assertion. In the current work, we present parallel machine learning methods for predicting a subject's decision response to a given propositional statement based on independent component (IC) features derived from EEG and fMRI data. Our results demonstrate that IC features outperformed features derived from event related spectral perturbations derived from any single spectral band, yet were similar to accuracy across all spectral bands combined. We compared our diagnostic IC spatial maps with our conventional general linear model (GLM) results, and found that informative ICs had significant spatial overlap with our GLM results, yet also revealed unique regions like amygdala that were not statistically significant in GLM analyses. Overall, these results suggest that ICs may yield a parsimonious feature set that can be used along with a decision tree structure for interpretation of features used in classifying complex cognitive processes such as belief and disbelief across both fMRI and EEG neuroimaging modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3728485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37284852013-08-02 Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features Douglas, Pamela K. Lau, Edward Anderson, Ariana Head, Austin Kerr, Wesley Wollner, Margalit Moyer, Daniel Li, Wei Durnhofer, Mike Bramen, Jennifer Cohen, Mark S. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The complex task of assessing the veracity of a statement is thought to activate uniquely distributed brain regions based on whether a subject believes or disbelieves a given assertion. In the current work, we present parallel machine learning methods for predicting a subject's decision response to a given propositional statement based on independent component (IC) features derived from EEG and fMRI data. Our results demonstrate that IC features outperformed features derived from event related spectral perturbations derived from any single spectral band, yet were similar to accuracy across all spectral bands combined. We compared our diagnostic IC spatial maps with our conventional general linear model (GLM) results, and found that informative ICs had significant spatial overlap with our GLM results, yet also revealed unique regions like amygdala that were not statistically significant in GLM analyses. Overall, these results suggest that ICs may yield a parsimonious feature set that can be used along with a decision tree structure for interpretation of features used in classifying complex cognitive processes such as belief and disbelief across both fMRI and EEG neuroimaging modalities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3728485/ /pubmed/23914164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00392 Text en Copyright © 2013 Douglas, Lau, Anderson, Head, Kerr, Wollner, Moyer, Li, Durnhofer, Bramen and Cohen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Douglas, Pamela K.
Lau, Edward
Anderson, Ariana
Head, Austin
Kerr, Wesley
Wollner, Margalit
Moyer, Daniel
Li, Wei
Durnhofer, Mike
Bramen, Jennifer
Cohen, Mark S.
Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features
title Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features
title_full Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features
title_fullStr Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features
title_full_unstemmed Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features
title_short Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features
title_sort single trial decoding of belief decision making from eeg and fmri data using independent components features
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00392
work_keys_str_mv AT douglaspamelak singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT lauedward singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT andersonariana singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT headaustin singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT kerrwesley singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT wollnermargalit singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT moyerdaniel singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT liwei singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT durnhofermike singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT bramenjennifer singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures
AT cohenmarks singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures