Cargando…
Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features
The complex task of assessing the veracity of a statement is thought to activate uniquely distributed brain regions based on whether a subject believes or disbelieves a given assertion. In the current work, we present parallel machine learning methods for predicting a subject's decision respons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00392 |
_version_ | 1782278867001540608 |
---|---|
author | Douglas, Pamela K. Lau, Edward Anderson, Ariana Head, Austin Kerr, Wesley Wollner, Margalit Moyer, Daniel Li, Wei Durnhofer, Mike Bramen, Jennifer Cohen, Mark S. |
author_facet | Douglas, Pamela K. Lau, Edward Anderson, Ariana Head, Austin Kerr, Wesley Wollner, Margalit Moyer, Daniel Li, Wei Durnhofer, Mike Bramen, Jennifer Cohen, Mark S. |
author_sort | Douglas, Pamela K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The complex task of assessing the veracity of a statement is thought to activate uniquely distributed brain regions based on whether a subject believes or disbelieves a given assertion. In the current work, we present parallel machine learning methods for predicting a subject's decision response to a given propositional statement based on independent component (IC) features derived from EEG and fMRI data. Our results demonstrate that IC features outperformed features derived from event related spectral perturbations derived from any single spectral band, yet were similar to accuracy across all spectral bands combined. We compared our diagnostic IC spatial maps with our conventional general linear model (GLM) results, and found that informative ICs had significant spatial overlap with our GLM results, yet also revealed unique regions like amygdala that were not statistically significant in GLM analyses. Overall, these results suggest that ICs may yield a parsimonious feature set that can be used along with a decision tree structure for interpretation of features used in classifying complex cognitive processes such as belief and disbelief across both fMRI and EEG neuroimaging modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3728485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37284852013-08-02 Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features Douglas, Pamela K. Lau, Edward Anderson, Ariana Head, Austin Kerr, Wesley Wollner, Margalit Moyer, Daniel Li, Wei Durnhofer, Mike Bramen, Jennifer Cohen, Mark S. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The complex task of assessing the veracity of a statement is thought to activate uniquely distributed brain regions based on whether a subject believes or disbelieves a given assertion. In the current work, we present parallel machine learning methods for predicting a subject's decision response to a given propositional statement based on independent component (IC) features derived from EEG and fMRI data. Our results demonstrate that IC features outperformed features derived from event related spectral perturbations derived from any single spectral band, yet were similar to accuracy across all spectral bands combined. We compared our diagnostic IC spatial maps with our conventional general linear model (GLM) results, and found that informative ICs had significant spatial overlap with our GLM results, yet also revealed unique regions like amygdala that were not statistically significant in GLM analyses. Overall, these results suggest that ICs may yield a parsimonious feature set that can be used along with a decision tree structure for interpretation of features used in classifying complex cognitive processes such as belief and disbelief across both fMRI and EEG neuroimaging modalities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3728485/ /pubmed/23914164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00392 Text en Copyright © 2013 Douglas, Lau, Anderson, Head, Kerr, Wollner, Moyer, Li, Durnhofer, Bramen and Cohen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Douglas, Pamela K. Lau, Edward Anderson, Ariana Head, Austin Kerr, Wesley Wollner, Margalit Moyer, Daniel Li, Wei Durnhofer, Mike Bramen, Jennifer Cohen, Mark S. Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features |
title | Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features |
title_full | Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features |
title_fullStr | Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features |
title_full_unstemmed | Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features |
title_short | Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features |
title_sort | single trial decoding of belief decision making from eeg and fmri data using independent components features |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglaspamelak singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT lauedward singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT andersonariana singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT headaustin singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT kerrwesley singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT wollnermargalit singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT moyerdaniel singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT liwei singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT durnhofermike singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT bramenjennifer singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures AT cohenmarks singletrialdecodingofbeliefdecisionmakingfromeegandfmridatausingindependentcomponentsfeatures |