Cargando…

Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study

Objective: To determine whether visual evoked magnetic fields (VEFs) elicited by right and left hemifield stimulation differ in patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) that results from cerebrovascular accident. Methods: Pattern-reversal stimulation of the right and left hemifield was perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mizuno, Katsuhiro, Tsuji, Tetsuya, Rossetti, Yves, Pisella, Laure, Ohde, Hisao, Liu, Meigen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00432
_version_ 1782278867914850304
author Mizuno, Katsuhiro
Tsuji, Tetsuya
Rossetti, Yves
Pisella, Laure
Ohde, Hisao
Liu, Meigen
author_facet Mizuno, Katsuhiro
Tsuji, Tetsuya
Rossetti, Yves
Pisella, Laure
Ohde, Hisao
Liu, Meigen
author_sort Mizuno, Katsuhiro
collection PubMed
description Objective: To determine whether visual evoked magnetic fields (VEFs) elicited by right and left hemifield stimulation differ in patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) that results from cerebrovascular accident. Methods: Pattern-reversal stimulation of the right and left hemifield was performed in three patients with left USN. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was recorded using a 160-channel system, and VEFs were quantified in the 400 ms after each stimulus. The presence or absence of VEF components at around 100 ms (P100m component) and 145 ms (N145m component) after stimulus onset was determined. The source of the VEF was determined using a single equivalent current dipole model for spherical volume conduction. All patients were evaluated using the behavioral inattention test (BIT). Results: In response to right hemifield stimulation, the P100m and N145m components of the VEF were evident in all three patients. In response to left hemifield stimulation, both components were evident in Patient 3, whereas only the P100m component was evident in Patient 1 and only the N145m component was evident in Patient 2. Patient 1 exhibited impairments on the line bisection and cancelation tasks of the BIT, Patient 2 exhibited impairments on the copying, drawing and cancelation tasks of the BIT, and Patient 3 exhibited impairments on the cancelation task of the BIT. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that early VEFs are disrupted in patients with USN and support the concept that deficits in visual processing differ according to the clinical subtype of USN and the lesion location. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of using MEG to explore subtypes of neglect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3728490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37284902013-08-02 Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study Mizuno, Katsuhiro Tsuji, Tetsuya Rossetti, Yves Pisella, Laure Ohde, Hisao Liu, Meigen Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: To determine whether visual evoked magnetic fields (VEFs) elicited by right and left hemifield stimulation differ in patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) that results from cerebrovascular accident. Methods: Pattern-reversal stimulation of the right and left hemifield was performed in three patients with left USN. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was recorded using a 160-channel system, and VEFs were quantified in the 400 ms after each stimulus. The presence or absence of VEF components at around 100 ms (P100m component) and 145 ms (N145m component) after stimulus onset was determined. The source of the VEF was determined using a single equivalent current dipole model for spherical volume conduction. All patients were evaluated using the behavioral inattention test (BIT). Results: In response to right hemifield stimulation, the P100m and N145m components of the VEF were evident in all three patients. In response to left hemifield stimulation, both components were evident in Patient 3, whereas only the P100m component was evident in Patient 1 and only the N145m component was evident in Patient 2. Patient 1 exhibited impairments on the line bisection and cancelation tasks of the BIT, Patient 2 exhibited impairments on the copying, drawing and cancelation tasks of the BIT, and Patient 3 exhibited impairments on the cancelation task of the BIT. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that early VEFs are disrupted in patients with USN and support the concept that deficits in visual processing differ according to the clinical subtype of USN and the lesion location. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of using MEG to explore subtypes of neglect. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3728490/ /pubmed/23914171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00432 Text en Copyright © 2013 Mizuno, Tsuji, Rossetti, Pisella, Ohde and Liu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Mizuno, Katsuhiro
Tsuji, Tetsuya
Rossetti, Yves
Pisella, Laure
Ohde, Hisao
Liu, Meigen
Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_full Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_fullStr Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_full_unstemmed Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_short Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_sort early visual processing is affected by clinical subtype in patients with unilateral spatial neglect: a magnetoencephalography study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00432
work_keys_str_mv AT mizunokatsuhiro earlyvisualprocessingisaffectedbyclinicalsubtypeinpatientswithunilateralspatialneglectamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT tsujitetsuya earlyvisualprocessingisaffectedbyclinicalsubtypeinpatientswithunilateralspatialneglectamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT rossettiyves earlyvisualprocessingisaffectedbyclinicalsubtypeinpatientswithunilateralspatialneglectamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT pisellalaure earlyvisualprocessingisaffectedbyclinicalsubtypeinpatientswithunilateralspatialneglectamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT ohdehisao earlyvisualprocessingisaffectedbyclinicalsubtypeinpatientswithunilateralspatialneglectamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT liumeigen earlyvisualprocessingisaffectedbyclinicalsubtypeinpatientswithunilateralspatialneglectamagnetoencephalographystudy