Cargando…

Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation

We carried out whole transcriptome analysis of three species of Methylophilaceae, Methylotenera mobilis, Methylotenera versatilis and Methylovorus glucosotrophus, in order to determine which metabolic pathways are actively transcribed in cultures grown in laboratory on C1 substrates and how metaboli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vorobev, Alexey, Beck, David A.C., Kalyuzhnaya, Marina G., Lidstrom, Mary E., Chistoserdova, Ludmila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23904993
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.115
_version_ 1782278907281539072
author Vorobev, Alexey
Beck, David A.C.
Kalyuzhnaya, Marina G.
Lidstrom, Mary E.
Chistoserdova, Ludmila
author_facet Vorobev, Alexey
Beck, David A.C.
Kalyuzhnaya, Marina G.
Lidstrom, Mary E.
Chistoserdova, Ludmila
author_sort Vorobev, Alexey
collection PubMed
description We carried out whole transcriptome analysis of three species of Methylophilaceae, Methylotenera mobilis, Methylotenera versatilis and Methylovorus glucosotrophus, in order to determine which metabolic pathways are actively transcribed in cultures grown in laboratory on C1 substrates and how metabolism changes under semi-in situ conditions. Comparative analyses of the transcriptomes were used to probe the metabolic strategies utilized by each of the organisms in the environment. Our analysis of transcript abundance data focused on changes in expression of methylotrophy metabolic modules, as well as on identifying any functional modules with pronounced response to in situ conditions compared to a limited set of laboratory conditions, highlighting their potential role in environmental adaptation. We demonstrate that transcriptional responses to environmental conditions involved both methylotrophy and non-methylotrophy metabolic modules as well as modules responsible for functions not directly connected to central metabolism. Our results further highlight the importance of XoxF enzymes that were previously demonstrated to be highly expressed in situ and proposed to be involved in metabolism of methanol by Methylophilaceae. At the same time, it appears that different species employ different homologous Xox systems as major metabolic modules. This study also reinforces prior observations of the apparent importance of the methylcitric acid cycle in the Methylotenera species and its role in environmental adaptation. High transcription from the respective gene clusters and pronounced response to in situ conditions, along with the reverse expression pattern for the ribulose monophosphate pathway that is the major pathway for carbon assimilation in laboratory conditions suggest that a switch in central metabolism of Methylotenera takes place in response to in situ conditions. The nature of the metabolite(s) processed via this pathway still remains unknown. Of the functions not related to central metabolism, flagellum and fimbria synthesis functions appeared to be of significance for environmental adaptation, based on their high abundance and differential expression. Our data demonstrate that, besides shared strategies, the organisms employed in this study also utilize strategies unique to each species, suggesting that the genomic divergence plays a role in environmental adaptation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3728764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37287642013-07-31 Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation Vorobev, Alexey Beck, David A.C. Kalyuzhnaya, Marina G. Lidstrom, Mary E. Chistoserdova, Ludmila PeerJ Environmental Sciences We carried out whole transcriptome analysis of three species of Methylophilaceae, Methylotenera mobilis, Methylotenera versatilis and Methylovorus glucosotrophus, in order to determine which metabolic pathways are actively transcribed in cultures grown in laboratory on C1 substrates and how metabolism changes under semi-in situ conditions. Comparative analyses of the transcriptomes were used to probe the metabolic strategies utilized by each of the organisms in the environment. Our analysis of transcript abundance data focused on changes in expression of methylotrophy metabolic modules, as well as on identifying any functional modules with pronounced response to in situ conditions compared to a limited set of laboratory conditions, highlighting their potential role in environmental adaptation. We demonstrate that transcriptional responses to environmental conditions involved both methylotrophy and non-methylotrophy metabolic modules as well as modules responsible for functions not directly connected to central metabolism. Our results further highlight the importance of XoxF enzymes that were previously demonstrated to be highly expressed in situ and proposed to be involved in metabolism of methanol by Methylophilaceae. At the same time, it appears that different species employ different homologous Xox systems as major metabolic modules. This study also reinforces prior observations of the apparent importance of the methylcitric acid cycle in the Methylotenera species and its role in environmental adaptation. High transcription from the respective gene clusters and pronounced response to in situ conditions, along with the reverse expression pattern for the ribulose monophosphate pathway that is the major pathway for carbon assimilation in laboratory conditions suggest that a switch in central metabolism of Methylotenera takes place in response to in situ conditions. The nature of the metabolite(s) processed via this pathway still remains unknown. Of the functions not related to central metabolism, flagellum and fimbria synthesis functions appeared to be of significance for environmental adaptation, based on their high abundance and differential expression. Our data demonstrate that, besides shared strategies, the organisms employed in this study also utilize strategies unique to each species, suggesting that the genomic divergence plays a role in environmental adaptation. PeerJ Inc. 2013-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3728764/ /pubmed/23904993 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.115 Text en © 2013 Vorobev et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Environmental Sciences
Vorobev, Alexey
Beck, David A.C.
Kalyuzhnaya, Marina G.
Lidstrom, Mary E.
Chistoserdova, Ludmila
Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation
title Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation
title_full Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation
title_fullStr Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation
title_short Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation
title_sort comparative transcriptomics in three methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation
topic Environmental Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23904993
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.115
work_keys_str_mv AT vorobevalexey comparativetranscriptomicsinthreemethylophilaceaespeciesuncoverdifferentstrategiesforenvironmentaladaptation
AT beckdavidac comparativetranscriptomicsinthreemethylophilaceaespeciesuncoverdifferentstrategiesforenvironmentaladaptation
AT kalyuzhnayamarinag comparativetranscriptomicsinthreemethylophilaceaespeciesuncoverdifferentstrategiesforenvironmentaladaptation
AT lidstrommarye comparativetranscriptomicsinthreemethylophilaceaespeciesuncoverdifferentstrategiesforenvironmentaladaptation
AT chistoserdovaludmila comparativetranscriptomicsinthreemethylophilaceaespeciesuncoverdifferentstrategiesforenvironmentaladaptation