Cargando…

Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: The Australian federal government introduced private health insurance incentive policy reforms in 2000 that increased the uptake of private health insurance in Australia. There is currently a lack of evidence on the effect of the policy reforms on access to cardiovascular interventions i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trafalski, Shauna, Briffa, Tom, Hung, Joseph, Moorin, Rachael E, Sanfilippo, Frank, Preen, David B, Einarsdóttir, Kristjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-280
_version_ 1782278957880573952
author Trafalski, Shauna
Briffa, Tom
Hung, Joseph
Moorin, Rachael E
Sanfilippo, Frank
Preen, David B
Einarsdóttir, Kristjana
author_facet Trafalski, Shauna
Briffa, Tom
Hung, Joseph
Moorin, Rachael E
Sanfilippo, Frank
Preen, David B
Einarsdóttir, Kristjana
author_sort Trafalski, Shauna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Australian federal government introduced private health insurance incentive policy reforms in 2000 that increased the uptake of private health insurance in Australia. There is currently a lack of evidence on the effect of the policy reforms on access to cardiovascular interventions in public and private hospitals in Australia. The aim was to investigate whether the increased private health insurance uptake influenced trends in emergency and elective coronary artery revascularisation procedures (CARPs) for private and public patients. METHODS: We included 34,423 incident CARPs from Western Australia during 1995-2008 in this study. Rates of emergency and elective CARPs were stratified for publicly and privately funded patients. The average annual percent change (AAPC) in trend was calculated before and after 2000 using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: The rate of emergency CARPs, which were predominantly percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with stenting, increased throughout the study period for both public and private patients (AAPC=12.9%, 95% CI=5.0,22.0 and 14.1%, 95% CI=9.8,18.6, respectively) with no significant difference in trends before and after policy implementation. The rate of elective PCIs with stenting from 2000 onwards remained relatively stable for public patients (AAPC=−6.0, 95% C= −16.9,6.4), but increased by 4.1% on average annually (95% CI=1.8,6.3) for private patients (p(difference)=0.04 between groups). This rate increase for private patients was only seen in people aged over 65 years and people residing in high socioeconomic areas. CONCLUSIONS: The private health insurance incentive policy reforms are a likely contributing factor in the shift in 2000 from public to privately-funded elective PCIs with stenting. These reforms as well as the increasing number of private hospitals may have been successful in increasing the availability of publicly-funded beds since 2000.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3729369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37293692013-08-01 Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study Trafalski, Shauna Briffa, Tom Hung, Joseph Moorin, Rachael E Sanfilippo, Frank Preen, David B Einarsdóttir, Kristjana BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Australian federal government introduced private health insurance incentive policy reforms in 2000 that increased the uptake of private health insurance in Australia. There is currently a lack of evidence on the effect of the policy reforms on access to cardiovascular interventions in public and private hospitals in Australia. The aim was to investigate whether the increased private health insurance uptake influenced trends in emergency and elective coronary artery revascularisation procedures (CARPs) for private and public patients. METHODS: We included 34,423 incident CARPs from Western Australia during 1995-2008 in this study. Rates of emergency and elective CARPs were stratified for publicly and privately funded patients. The average annual percent change (AAPC) in trend was calculated before and after 2000 using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: The rate of emergency CARPs, which were predominantly percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with stenting, increased throughout the study period for both public and private patients (AAPC=12.9%, 95% CI=5.0,22.0 and 14.1%, 95% CI=9.8,18.6, respectively) with no significant difference in trends before and after policy implementation. The rate of elective PCIs with stenting from 2000 onwards remained relatively stable for public patients (AAPC=−6.0, 95% C= −16.9,6.4), but increased by 4.1% on average annually (95% CI=1.8,6.3) for private patients (p(difference)=0.04 between groups). This rate increase for private patients was only seen in people aged over 65 years and people residing in high socioeconomic areas. CONCLUSIONS: The private health insurance incentive policy reforms are a likely contributing factor in the shift in 2000 from public to privately-funded elective PCIs with stenting. These reforms as well as the increasing number of private hospitals may have been successful in increasing the availability of publicly-funded beds since 2000. BioMed Central 2013-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3729369/ /pubmed/23870450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-280 Text en Copyright © 2013 Trafalski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Trafalski, Shauna
Briffa, Tom
Hung, Joseph
Moorin, Rachael E
Sanfilippo, Frank
Preen, David B
Einarsdóttir, Kristjana
Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study
title Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study
title_full Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study
title_fullStr Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study
title_short Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study
title_sort effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in western australia: a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-280
work_keys_str_mv AT trafalskishauna effectofprivateinsuranceincentivepolicyreformsontrendsincoronaryrevascularisationproceduresintheprivateandpublichealthsectorsinwesternaustraliaacohortstudy
AT briffatom effectofprivateinsuranceincentivepolicyreformsontrendsincoronaryrevascularisationproceduresintheprivateandpublichealthsectorsinwesternaustraliaacohortstudy
AT hungjoseph effectofprivateinsuranceincentivepolicyreformsontrendsincoronaryrevascularisationproceduresintheprivateandpublichealthsectorsinwesternaustraliaacohortstudy
AT moorinrachaele effectofprivateinsuranceincentivepolicyreformsontrendsincoronaryrevascularisationproceduresintheprivateandpublichealthsectorsinwesternaustraliaacohortstudy
AT sanfilippofrank effectofprivateinsuranceincentivepolicyreformsontrendsincoronaryrevascularisationproceduresintheprivateandpublichealthsectorsinwesternaustraliaacohortstudy
AT preendavidb effectofprivateinsuranceincentivepolicyreformsontrendsincoronaryrevascularisationproceduresintheprivateandpublichealthsectorsinwesternaustraliaacohortstudy
AT einarsdottirkristjana effectofprivateinsuranceincentivepolicyreformsontrendsincoronaryrevascularisationproceduresintheprivateandpublichealthsectorsinwesternaustraliaacohortstudy