Cargando…

Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that brachial plexopathy following head and neck cancer radiotherapy may be underreported and that this toxicity is associated with a dose–response. Our purpose was to determine whether the dose to the brachial plexus (BP) can be constrained, without compro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert, Mutter W, Lok, Benjamin H, Dutta, Pinaki R, Riaz, Nadeem, Setton, Jeremy, Berry, Sean L, Goenka, Anuj, Zhang, Zhigang, Rao, Shyam S, Wolden, Suzanne L, Lee, Nancy Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23835205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-173
_version_ 1782278980444880896
author Robert, Mutter W
Lok, Benjamin H
Dutta, Pinaki R
Riaz, Nadeem
Setton, Jeremy
Berry, Sean L
Goenka, Anuj
Zhang, Zhigang
Rao, Shyam S
Wolden, Suzanne L
Lee, Nancy Y
author_facet Robert, Mutter W
Lok, Benjamin H
Dutta, Pinaki R
Riaz, Nadeem
Setton, Jeremy
Berry, Sean L
Goenka, Anuj
Zhang, Zhigang
Rao, Shyam S
Wolden, Suzanne L
Lee, Nancy Y
author_sort Robert, Mutter W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that brachial plexopathy following head and neck cancer radiotherapy may be underreported and that this toxicity is associated with a dose–response. Our purpose was to determine whether the dose to the brachial plexus (BP) can be constrained, without compromising regional control. METHODS: The radiation plans of 324 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were reviewed. We identified 42 patients (13%) with gross nodal disease <1 cm from the BP. Normal tissue constraints included a maximum dose of 66 Gy and a D(05) of 60 Gy for the BP. These criteria took precedence over planning target volume (PTV) coverage of nodal disease near the BP. RESULTS: There was only one regional failure in the vicinity of the BP, salvaged with neck dissection (ND) and regional re-irradiation. There have been no reported episodes of brachial plexopathy to date. CONCLUSIONS: In combined-modality therapy, including ND as salvage, regional control did not appear to be compromised by constraining the dose to the BP. This approach may improve the therapeutic ratio by reducing the long-term risk of brachial plexopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3729584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37295842013-08-01 Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma Robert, Mutter W Lok, Benjamin H Dutta, Pinaki R Riaz, Nadeem Setton, Jeremy Berry, Sean L Goenka, Anuj Zhang, Zhigang Rao, Shyam S Wolden, Suzanne L Lee, Nancy Y Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that brachial plexopathy following head and neck cancer radiotherapy may be underreported and that this toxicity is associated with a dose–response. Our purpose was to determine whether the dose to the brachial plexus (BP) can be constrained, without compromising regional control. METHODS: The radiation plans of 324 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were reviewed. We identified 42 patients (13%) with gross nodal disease <1 cm from the BP. Normal tissue constraints included a maximum dose of 66 Gy and a D(05) of 60 Gy for the BP. These criteria took precedence over planning target volume (PTV) coverage of nodal disease near the BP. RESULTS: There was only one regional failure in the vicinity of the BP, salvaged with neck dissection (ND) and regional re-irradiation. There have been no reported episodes of brachial plexopathy to date. CONCLUSIONS: In combined-modality therapy, including ND as salvage, regional control did not appear to be compromised by constraining the dose to the BP. This approach may improve the therapeutic ratio by reducing the long-term risk of brachial plexopathy. BioMed Central 2013-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3729584/ /pubmed/23835205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-173 Text en Copyright © 2013 Robert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Robert, Mutter W
Lok, Benjamin H
Dutta, Pinaki R
Riaz, Nadeem
Setton, Jeremy
Berry, Sean L
Goenka, Anuj
Zhang, Zhigang
Rao, Shyam S
Wolden, Suzanne L
Lee, Nancy Y
Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma
title Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma
title_full Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma
title_fullStr Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma
title_short Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma
title_sort constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23835205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-173
work_keys_str_mv AT robertmutterw constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT lokbenjaminh constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT duttapinakir constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT riaznadeem constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT settonjeremy constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT berryseanl constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT goenkaanuj constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT zhangzhigang constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT raoshyams constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT woldensuzannel constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT leenancyy constrainingthebrachialplexusdoesnotcompromiseregionalcontrolinoropharyngealcarcinoma