Cargando…

Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases

PURPOSE: To compare the foveal thickness (FT) parameters measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Spectralis OCT in various retinal diseases and to construct conversion formulas between the two types of OCT devices. METHODS: We examined 366 consecutive patients (475 eyes) with reti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roh, Young-Rae, Park, Kyu Hyung, Woo, Se Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2013.27.4.268
_version_ 1782279020546621440
author Roh, Young-Rae
Park, Kyu Hyung
Woo, Se Joon
author_facet Roh, Young-Rae
Park, Kyu Hyung
Woo, Se Joon
author_sort Roh, Young-Rae
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the foveal thickness (FT) parameters measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Spectralis OCT in various retinal diseases and to construct conversion formulas between the two types of OCT devices. METHODS: We examined 366 consecutive patients (475 eyes) with retinal diseases and 13 normal controls (13 eyes). The patients were categorized into eight retinal disease groups. The mean amount and distribution of foveal thickness differences (FTD) measured by Stratus and Spectralis OCT were determined, and conversion formulas were constructed for Stratus OCT FT from Spectralis OCT FT for each retinal disease group. RESULTS: Among retinal diseases, the mean FTD was significantly larger in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients (mean ± SD, 94.0 ± 55.0 µm) compared to normal subjects (66.2 ± 11.7 µm; p < 0.0001). The proportion of eyes with a mean FTD outside 1.96 standard deviations of normal subject FTD was greatest in the exudative AMD (50.0%) group and smallest in the macular hole (18.2%) group. The predicted FTs obtained through the conversion formulas showed lower variance than the actual FTD values, especially in the exudative AMD group. The prediction line for exudative AMD deviated most from that of normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: FTD shows diverse values and variances among various retinal diseases, especially in exudative AMD, which indicates that Stratus OCT FT cannot be predicted from Spectralis OCT FT by FTD value alone. We constructed statistically significant conversion formulas, which provided more reliable methods to predict Stratus OCT-measured FT from Spectralis OCT measurements for different retinal disease groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3730069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37300692013-08-01 Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases Roh, Young-Rae Park, Kyu Hyung Woo, Se Joon Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the foveal thickness (FT) parameters measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Spectralis OCT in various retinal diseases and to construct conversion formulas between the two types of OCT devices. METHODS: We examined 366 consecutive patients (475 eyes) with retinal diseases and 13 normal controls (13 eyes). The patients were categorized into eight retinal disease groups. The mean amount and distribution of foveal thickness differences (FTD) measured by Stratus and Spectralis OCT were determined, and conversion formulas were constructed for Stratus OCT FT from Spectralis OCT FT for each retinal disease group. RESULTS: Among retinal diseases, the mean FTD was significantly larger in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients (mean ± SD, 94.0 ± 55.0 µm) compared to normal subjects (66.2 ± 11.7 µm; p < 0.0001). The proportion of eyes with a mean FTD outside 1.96 standard deviations of normal subject FTD was greatest in the exudative AMD (50.0%) group and smallest in the macular hole (18.2%) group. The predicted FTs obtained through the conversion formulas showed lower variance than the actual FTD values, especially in the exudative AMD group. The prediction line for exudative AMD deviated most from that of normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: FTD shows diverse values and variances among various retinal diseases, especially in exudative AMD, which indicates that Stratus OCT FT cannot be predicted from Spectralis OCT FT by FTD value alone. We constructed statistically significant conversion formulas, which provided more reliable methods to predict Stratus OCT-measured FT from Spectralis OCT measurements for different retinal disease groups. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2013-08 2013-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3730069/ /pubmed/23908573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2013.27.4.268 Text en © 2013 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Roh, Young-Rae
Park, Kyu Hyung
Woo, Se Joon
Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases
title Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases
title_full Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases
title_fullStr Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases
title_short Foveal Thickness between Stratus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Diseases
title_sort foveal thickness between stratus and spectralis optical coherence tomography in retinal diseases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2013.27.4.268
work_keys_str_mv AT rohyoungrae fovealthicknessbetweenstratusandspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyinretinaldiseases
AT parkkyuhyung fovealthicknessbetweenstratusandspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyinretinaldiseases
AT woosejoon fovealthicknessbetweenstratusandspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyinretinaldiseases