Cargando…

Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes

BACKGROUND: Visceral fat plays an important role in the development of metabolic disease independently of the effect of overall abdominal fat. Ultrasonography is an accessible method of accurately assessing abdominal fat distribution in epidemiological studies, but few details about the reproducibil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philipsen, A, Carstensen, B, Sandbaek, A, Almdal, T P, Johansen, N B, Jørgensen, M E, Witte, D R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23917154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2013.23
_version_ 1782279050139533312
author Philipsen, A
Carstensen, B
Sandbaek, A
Almdal, T P
Johansen, N B
Jørgensen, M E
Witte, D R
author_facet Philipsen, A
Carstensen, B
Sandbaek, A
Almdal, T P
Johansen, N B
Jørgensen, M E
Witte, D R
author_sort Philipsen, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Visceral fat plays an important role in the development of metabolic disease independently of the effect of overall abdominal fat. Ultrasonography is an accessible method of accurately assessing abdominal fat distribution in epidemiological studies, but few details about the reproducibility of this method have been published. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of ultrasonography in the assessment of abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of type 2 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Ultrasonography was used to estimate visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat. Intra- and interobserver variation, short-term variation and variation between estimates in the fasting and non-fasting state were examined in three samples of 30, 33 and 23 participants from the ADDITION-PRO study. A variance components model was used to calculate intra- and interobserver variation, and Bland–Altman plots were drawn for all three substudies. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation for intra- and interobserver variation were in the range 3.4–6.1%, except for interobserver variation for subcutaneous fat (9.5%). Short-term variation over a median of 35 days had a coefficient of variation of 15%. The effect of a meal was primarily on the visceral estimates and did not extend beyond the first postprandial hour. Non-fasting visceral estimates were larger than fasting estimates. CONCLUSION: Both visceral and subcutaneous fat can be estimated with ultrasonography with adequate intra- and interobserver reproducibility by clinical researchers with limited training, making it a feasible method of assessing abdominal fat distribution in epidemiological studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3730221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37302212013-08-01 Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes Philipsen, A Carstensen, B Sandbaek, A Almdal, T P Johansen, N B Jørgensen, M E Witte, D R Nutr Diabetes Original Article BACKGROUND: Visceral fat plays an important role in the development of metabolic disease independently of the effect of overall abdominal fat. Ultrasonography is an accessible method of accurately assessing abdominal fat distribution in epidemiological studies, but few details about the reproducibility of this method have been published. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of ultrasonography in the assessment of abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of type 2 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Ultrasonography was used to estimate visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat. Intra- and interobserver variation, short-term variation and variation between estimates in the fasting and non-fasting state were examined in three samples of 30, 33 and 23 participants from the ADDITION-PRO study. A variance components model was used to calculate intra- and interobserver variation, and Bland–Altman plots were drawn for all three substudies. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation for intra- and interobserver variation were in the range 3.4–6.1%, except for interobserver variation for subcutaneous fat (9.5%). Short-term variation over a median of 35 days had a coefficient of variation of 15%. The effect of a meal was primarily on the visceral estimates and did not extend beyond the first postprandial hour. Non-fasting visceral estimates were larger than fasting estimates. CONCLUSION: Both visceral and subcutaneous fat can be estimated with ultrasonography with adequate intra- and interobserver reproducibility by clinical researchers with limited training, making it a feasible method of assessing abdominal fat distribution in epidemiological studies. Nature Publishing Group 2013-08 2013-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3730221/ /pubmed/23917154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2013.23 Text en Copyright © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Philipsen, A
Carstensen, B
Sandbaek, A
Almdal, T P
Johansen, N B
Jørgensen, M E
Witte, D R
Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes
title Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes
title_full Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes
title_fullStr Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes
title_short Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes
title_sort reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23917154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2013.23
work_keys_str_mv AT philipsena reproducibilityofultrasonographyforassessingabdominalfatdistributioninapopulationathighriskofdiabetes
AT carstensenb reproducibilityofultrasonographyforassessingabdominalfatdistributioninapopulationathighriskofdiabetes
AT sandbaeka reproducibilityofultrasonographyforassessingabdominalfatdistributioninapopulationathighriskofdiabetes
AT almdaltp reproducibilityofultrasonographyforassessingabdominalfatdistributioninapopulationathighriskofdiabetes
AT johansennb reproducibilityofultrasonographyforassessingabdominalfatdistributioninapopulationathighriskofdiabetes
AT jørgensenme reproducibilityofultrasonographyforassessingabdominalfatdistributioninapopulationathighriskofdiabetes
AT wittedr reproducibilityofultrasonographyforassessingabdominalfatdistributioninapopulationathighriskofdiabetes