Cargando…

Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency and severity of segmentation errors of two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) devices and error effect on central macular thickness (CMT) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven eyes of 25 patients with neovascular age-related macular degen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Moosang, Lee, Seung Jun, Han, Jisang, Yu, Seung-Young, Kwak, Hyung Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23314254
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.97075
_version_ 1782279094867591168
author Kim, Moosang
Lee, Seung Jun
Han, Jisang
Yu, Seung-Young
Kwak, Hyung Woo
author_facet Kim, Moosang
Lee, Seung Jun
Han, Jisang
Yu, Seung-Young
Kwak, Hyung Woo
author_sort Kim, Moosang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency and severity of segmentation errors of two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) devices and error effect on central macular thickness (CMT) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven eyes of 25 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, examined using the Cirrus HD-OCT and Spectralis HRA + OCT, were retrospectively reviewed. Macular cube 512 × 128 and 5-line raster scans were performed with the Cirrus and 512 × 25 volume scans with the Spectralis. Frequency and severity of segmentation errors were compared between scans. RESULTS: Segmentation error frequency was 47.4% (baseline), 40.7% (1 month), 40.7% (2 months), and 48.1% (6 months) for the Cirrus, and 59.3%, 62.2%, 57.8%, and 63.7%, respectively, for the Spectralis, differing significantly between devices at all examinations (P < 0.05), except at baseline. Average error score was 1.21 ± 1.65 (baseline), 0.79 ± 1.18 (1 month), 0.74 ± 1.12 (2 months), and 0.96 ± 1.11 (6 months) for the Cirrus, and 1.73 ± 1.50, 1.54 ± 1.35, 1.38 ± 1.40, and 1.49 ± 1.30, respectively, for the Spectralis, differing significantly at 1 month and 2 months (P < 0.02). Automated and manual CMT measurements by the Spectralis were larger than those by the Cirrus. CONCLUSIONS: The Cirrus HD-OCT had a lower frequency and severity of segmentation error than the Spectralis HRA + OCT. SD-OCT error should be considered when evaluating retinal thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3730504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37305042013-08-06 Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration Kim, Moosang Lee, Seung Jun Han, Jisang Yu, Seung-Young Kwak, Hyung Woo Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency and severity of segmentation errors of two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) devices and error effect on central macular thickness (CMT) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven eyes of 25 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, examined using the Cirrus HD-OCT and Spectralis HRA + OCT, were retrospectively reviewed. Macular cube 512 × 128 and 5-line raster scans were performed with the Cirrus and 512 × 25 volume scans with the Spectralis. Frequency and severity of segmentation errors were compared between scans. RESULTS: Segmentation error frequency was 47.4% (baseline), 40.7% (1 month), 40.7% (2 months), and 48.1% (6 months) for the Cirrus, and 59.3%, 62.2%, 57.8%, and 63.7%, respectively, for the Spectralis, differing significantly between devices at all examinations (P < 0.05), except at baseline. Average error score was 1.21 ± 1.65 (baseline), 0.79 ± 1.18 (1 month), 0.74 ± 1.12 (2 months), and 0.96 ± 1.11 (6 months) for the Cirrus, and 1.73 ± 1.50, 1.54 ± 1.35, 1.38 ± 1.40, and 1.49 ± 1.30, respectively, for the Spectralis, differing significantly at 1 month and 2 months (P < 0.02). Automated and manual CMT measurements by the Spectralis were larger than those by the Cirrus. CONCLUSIONS: The Cirrus HD-OCT had a lower frequency and severity of segmentation error than the Spectralis HRA + OCT. SD-OCT error should be considered when evaluating retinal thickness. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3730504/ /pubmed/23314254 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.97075 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Moosang
Lee, Seung Jun
Han, Jisang
Yu, Seung-Young
Kwak, Hyung Woo
Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_full Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_fullStr Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_full_unstemmed Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_short Segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_sort segmentation error and macular thickness measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23314254
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.97075
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmoosang segmentationerrorandmacularthicknessmeasurementsobtainedwithspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographydevicesinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT leeseungjun segmentationerrorandmacularthicknessmeasurementsobtainedwithspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographydevicesinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT hanjisang segmentationerrorandmacularthicknessmeasurementsobtainedwithspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographydevicesinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT yuseungyoung segmentationerrorandmacularthicknessmeasurementsobtainedwithspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographydevicesinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT kwakhyungwoo segmentationerrorandmacularthicknessmeasurementsobtainedwithspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographydevicesinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration