Cargando…

Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in patients with keratoconus using a mechanical implantation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty eyes of 17 patients with keratoconus were enrolled. ICRSs (Keraring) were implanted after dissecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tunc, Zeki, Helvacioglu, Firat, Sencan, Sadik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571258
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.109519
_version_ 1782279095093035008
author Tunc, Zeki
Helvacioglu, Firat
Sencan, Sadik
author_facet Tunc, Zeki
Helvacioglu, Firat
Sencan, Sadik
author_sort Tunc, Zeki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in patients with keratoconus using a mechanical implantation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty eyes of 17 patients with keratoconus were enrolled. ICRSs (Keraring) were implanted after dissection of the tunnel using Tunc's specially designed dissector under suction. A complete ophthalmic examination was performed, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent, keratometric readings, inferosuperior asymmetry index (ISAI), and ultrasound pachymetry. All 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups were completed, and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mean preoperative UDVA for all eyes was 1.36 ± 0.64 logMAR. At 12 months, the mean UDVA was 0.51 ± 0.28 logMAR (P = 0.001), and the mean preoperative CDVA was 0.57 ± 0.29 logMAR, which improved to 0.23 ± 0.18 (P = 0.001) at 1 year. There was a significant reduction in spherical equivalent refractive error from –6.42 ± 4.69 diopters (D) preoperatively to –1.26 ± 1.45 D (P = 0.001) at 1 year. In the same period, the mean K-readings improved from 49.38 ± 3.72 D to 44.43 ± 3.13 D (P = 0.001), and the mean ISAI improved from 7.92 ± 3.12 to 4.21 ± 1.96 (P = 0.003). No significant changes in mean central corneal thickness were observed postoperatively. There were no major complications during and or after surgery. CONCLUSION: ICRS implantation using a unique mechanical dissection technique is a safe and effective treatment for keratoconus. All parameters improved by the 1-year follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3730505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37305052013-08-06 Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique Tunc, Zeki Helvacioglu, Firat Sencan, Sadik Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in patients with keratoconus using a mechanical implantation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty eyes of 17 patients with keratoconus were enrolled. ICRSs (Keraring) were implanted after dissection of the tunnel using Tunc's specially designed dissector under suction. A complete ophthalmic examination was performed, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent, keratometric readings, inferosuperior asymmetry index (ISAI), and ultrasound pachymetry. All 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups were completed, and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mean preoperative UDVA for all eyes was 1.36 ± 0.64 logMAR. At 12 months, the mean UDVA was 0.51 ± 0.28 logMAR (P = 0.001), and the mean preoperative CDVA was 0.57 ± 0.29 logMAR, which improved to 0.23 ± 0.18 (P = 0.001) at 1 year. There was a significant reduction in spherical equivalent refractive error from –6.42 ± 4.69 diopters (D) preoperatively to –1.26 ± 1.45 D (P = 0.001) at 1 year. In the same period, the mean K-readings improved from 49.38 ± 3.72 D to 44.43 ± 3.13 D (P = 0.001), and the mean ISAI improved from 7.92 ± 3.12 to 4.21 ± 1.96 (P = 0.003). No significant changes in mean central corneal thickness were observed postoperatively. There were no major complications during and or after surgery. CONCLUSION: ICRS implantation using a unique mechanical dissection technique is a safe and effective treatment for keratoconus. All parameters improved by the 1-year follow-up. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3730505/ /pubmed/23571258 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.109519 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tunc, Zeki
Helvacioglu, Firat
Sencan, Sadik
Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
title Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
title_full Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
title_fullStr Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
title_short Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
title_sort evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571258
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.109519
work_keys_str_mv AT tunczeki evaluationofintrastromalcornealringsegmentsfortreatmentofkeratoconuswithamechanicalimplantationtechnique
AT helvacioglufirat evaluationofintrastromalcornealringsegmentsfortreatmentofkeratoconuswithamechanicalimplantationtechnique
AT sencansadik evaluationofintrastromalcornealringsegmentsfortreatmentofkeratoconuswithamechanicalimplantationtechnique