Cargando…
New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation
The Cox maze III and Cox maze IV procedures are surgical solutions for the treatment of symptomatic stand-alone atrial fibrillation. Despite their proven efficacy, these procedures have not gained widespread acceptance because of the invasiveness, complexity, and technical difficulty. Endocardial pu...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rambam Health Care Campus
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10116 |
_version_ | 1782279106846523392 |
---|---|
author | La Meir, Mark |
author_facet | La Meir, Mark |
author_sort | La Meir, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Cox maze III and Cox maze IV procedures are surgical solutions for the treatment of symptomatic stand-alone atrial fibrillation. Despite their proven efficacy, these procedures have not gained widespread acceptance because of the invasiveness, complexity, and technical difficulty. Endocardial pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of percutaneous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. It is currently accepted as an invasive therapy, if rhythm control has failed using antiarrhythmic drugs or electrical cardioversions. Pulmonary vein isolation is reported to be effective in 60%–85% of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and in 30%–50% of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. A second or third ablation is often necessary to achieve these results, and complications may occur in up to 6% of patients. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation has seen important improvements in the last decade. New technologies have simplified creation of transmural lesions on the beating heart through a less-invasive, thoracoscopic procedure. This allows for pulmonary vein isolation, isolation of the posterior wall, and left atrial appendage exclusion—usually combined with ganglionic plexi evaluation and destruction. Nonetheless, it is still uncertain whether these procedures are effective in restoring permanent sinus rhythm since transmurality of a lesion set cannot be guaranteed with current ablation catheters on the beating heart. In an attempt to limit the shortcomings of an endo- or an epicardial technique, a hybrid approach has recently been introduced. This approach is based on a close collaboration between the surgeon and the electrophysiologist, employing a patient-tailored procedure which is adapted to the origin of the patient’s atrial fibrillation and takes into consideration triggers and substrate. Using a mono- or bilateral energy source, a thoracoscopic epicardial approach is combined with a percutaneous endocardial ablation in a single-step or in a sequential-step procedure. This article provides our experience and an overview of the current knowledge in the hybrid treatment of stand-alone atrial fibrillation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3730751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Rambam Health Care Campus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37307512013-08-01 New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation La Meir, Mark Rambam Maimonides Med J Special Issue on New Technologies in Cardiovascular Surgery The Cox maze III and Cox maze IV procedures are surgical solutions for the treatment of symptomatic stand-alone atrial fibrillation. Despite their proven efficacy, these procedures have not gained widespread acceptance because of the invasiveness, complexity, and technical difficulty. Endocardial pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of percutaneous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. It is currently accepted as an invasive therapy, if rhythm control has failed using antiarrhythmic drugs or electrical cardioversions. Pulmonary vein isolation is reported to be effective in 60%–85% of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and in 30%–50% of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. A second or third ablation is often necessary to achieve these results, and complications may occur in up to 6% of patients. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation has seen important improvements in the last decade. New technologies have simplified creation of transmural lesions on the beating heart through a less-invasive, thoracoscopic procedure. This allows for pulmonary vein isolation, isolation of the posterior wall, and left atrial appendage exclusion—usually combined with ganglionic plexi evaluation and destruction. Nonetheless, it is still uncertain whether these procedures are effective in restoring permanent sinus rhythm since transmurality of a lesion set cannot be guaranteed with current ablation catheters on the beating heart. In an attempt to limit the shortcomings of an endo- or an epicardial technique, a hybrid approach has recently been introduced. This approach is based on a close collaboration between the surgeon and the electrophysiologist, employing a patient-tailored procedure which is adapted to the origin of the patient’s atrial fibrillation and takes into consideration triggers and substrate. Using a mono- or bilateral energy source, a thoracoscopic epicardial approach is combined with a percutaneous endocardial ablation in a single-step or in a sequential-step procedure. This article provides our experience and an overview of the current knowledge in the hybrid treatment of stand-alone atrial fibrillation. Rambam Health Care Campus 2013-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3730751/ /pubmed/23908866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10116 Text en © 2013 La Meir. This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue on New Technologies in Cardiovascular Surgery La Meir, Mark New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation |
title | New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full | New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation |
title_fullStr | New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation |
title_short | New Technologies and Hybrid Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation |
title_sort | new technologies and hybrid surgery for atrial fibrillation |
topic | Special Issue on New Technologies in Cardiovascular Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lameirmark newtechnologiesandhybridsurgeryforatrialfibrillation |