Cargando…

Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone

Introduction: Vertical osteogenic alveolar distraction (VOAD) allows for the augmentation of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants in atrophic alveolar ridges. The goal of this paper is to assess long-term peri-implant bone resorption in implants placed on bones subjected to VOAD,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Sayáns, Mario, León-Camacho, María A., Somoza-Martín, José M., Fernández-González, Beatriz, Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, Silvia, Gándara-Rey, José M., García-García, Abel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524476
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18545
_version_ 1782279117078528000
author Pérez-Sayáns, Mario
León-Camacho, María A.
Somoza-Martín, José M.
Fernández-González, Beatriz
Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, Silvia
Gándara-Rey, José M.
García-García, Abel
author_facet Pérez-Sayáns, Mario
León-Camacho, María A.
Somoza-Martín, José M.
Fernández-González, Beatriz
Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, Silvia
Gándara-Rey, José M.
García-García, Abel
author_sort Pérez-Sayáns, Mario
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Vertical osteogenic alveolar distraction (VOAD) allows for the augmentation of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants in atrophic alveolar ridges. The goal of this paper is to assess long-term peri-implant bone resorption in implants placed on bones subjected to VOAD, comparing it with a group of patients who had implants placed directly on the alveolar bone without previous bone regeneration. Material and Methods: We conducted a follow-up study on 32 patients who were divided into two groups: The Distraction Group (14 patients), and the Distraction-Free Group (18 patients), who received a total of 100 implants. Peri-implant bone loss was measured by means of panoramic X-rays, at the time of loading and one year later, and in 35 implants of each group after 3 years of functional loading. Results: The peri-implant bone resorption (PBR) average observed in the Distraction Group at the time of prosthetic placement is higher (0.50±0.09 mm) than in the Distraction-Free Group (0.25±0.06 mm), showing statistically significant results (p=0.047). PBR levels 1 year after loading were the same for both groups (0.66 mm). At 3 years, they were higher in the Distraction Group (1.03 ± 0.22 mm vs. 0.68 ± 0.08 mm). Key words:Bone resorption, alveolar distraction osteogenesis, dental implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3731099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37310992013-08-05 Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone Pérez-Sayáns, Mario León-Camacho, María A. Somoza-Martín, José M. Fernández-González, Beatriz Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, Silvia Gándara-Rey, José M. García-García, Abel Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research-Article Introduction: Vertical osteogenic alveolar distraction (VOAD) allows for the augmentation of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants in atrophic alveolar ridges. The goal of this paper is to assess long-term peri-implant bone resorption in implants placed on bones subjected to VOAD, comparing it with a group of patients who had implants placed directly on the alveolar bone without previous bone regeneration. Material and Methods: We conducted a follow-up study on 32 patients who were divided into two groups: The Distraction Group (14 patients), and the Distraction-Free Group (18 patients), who received a total of 100 implants. Peri-implant bone loss was measured by means of panoramic X-rays, at the time of loading and one year later, and in 35 implants of each group after 3 years of functional loading. Results: The peri-implant bone resorption (PBR) average observed in the Distraction Group at the time of prosthetic placement is higher (0.50±0.09 mm) than in the Distraction-Free Group (0.25±0.06 mm), showing statistically significant results (p=0.047). PBR levels 1 year after loading were the same for both groups (0.66 mm). At 3 years, they were higher in the Distraction Group (1.03 ± 0.22 mm vs. 0.68 ± 0.08 mm). Key words:Bone resorption, alveolar distraction osteogenesis, dental implants. Medicina Oral S.L. 2013-07 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3731099/ /pubmed/23524476 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18545 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Pérez-Sayáns, Mario
León-Camacho, María A.
Somoza-Martín, José M.
Fernández-González, Beatriz
Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, Silvia
Gándara-Rey, José M.
García-García, Abel
Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
title Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
title_full Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
title_fullStr Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
title_full_unstemmed Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
title_short Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
title_sort dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524476
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18545
work_keys_str_mv AT perezsayansmario dentalimplantsplacedonbonesubjectedtoverticalalveolardistractionshowthesameperformanceasthoseplacedonprimitivebone
AT leoncamachomariaa dentalimplantsplacedonbonesubjectedtoverticalalveolardistractionshowthesameperformanceasthoseplacedonprimitivebone
AT somozamartinjosem dentalimplantsplacedonbonesubjectedtoverticalalveolardistractionshowthesameperformanceasthoseplacedonprimitivebone
AT fernandezgonzalezbeatriz dentalimplantsplacedonbonesubjectedtoverticalalveolardistractionshowthesameperformanceasthoseplacedonprimitivebone
AT blanesvazquezgundinsilvia dentalimplantsplacedonbonesubjectedtoverticalalveolardistractionshowthesameperformanceasthoseplacedonprimitivebone
AT gandarareyjosem dentalimplantsplacedonbonesubjectedtoverticalalveolardistractionshowthesameperformanceasthoseplacedonprimitivebone
AT garciagarciaabel dentalimplantsplacedonbonesubjectedtoverticalalveolardistractionshowthesameperformanceasthoseplacedonprimitivebone