Cargando…

Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements

Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that resi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogt, Alexander, Goldman, Aaron David, Mochizuki, Kazufumi, Landweber, Laura F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23935529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659
_version_ 1782279121650319360
author Vogt, Alexander
Goldman, Aaron David
Mochizuki, Kazufumi
Landweber, Laura F.
author_facet Vogt, Alexander
Goldman, Aaron David
Mochizuki, Kazufumi
Landweber, Laura F.
author_sort Vogt, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that reside in the germline. Three independent studies recently showed that transposase proteins of the DDE/DDD superfamily are indispensible for DNA processing in three distantly related ciliates. In the spirotrich Oxytricha trifallax, high copy-number germline-limited transposons mediate their own excision from the somatic genome but also contribute to programmed genome rearrangement through a remarkable transposon mutualism with the host. By contrast, the genomes of two oligohymenophorean ciliates, Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia, encode homologous PiggyBac-like transposases as single-copy genes in both their germline and somatic genomes. These domesticated transposases are essential for deletion of thousands of different internal sequences in these species. This review contrasts the events underlying somatic genome reduction in three different ciliates and considers their evolutionary origins and the relationships among their distinct mechanisms for genome remodeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3731211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37312112013-08-09 Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements Vogt, Alexander Goldman, Aaron David Mochizuki, Kazufumi Landweber, Laura F. PLoS Genet Review Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that reside in the germline. Three independent studies recently showed that transposase proteins of the DDE/DDD superfamily are indispensible for DNA processing in three distantly related ciliates. In the spirotrich Oxytricha trifallax, high copy-number germline-limited transposons mediate their own excision from the somatic genome but also contribute to programmed genome rearrangement through a remarkable transposon mutualism with the host. By contrast, the genomes of two oligohymenophorean ciliates, Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia, encode homologous PiggyBac-like transposases as single-copy genes in both their germline and somatic genomes. These domesticated transposases are essential for deletion of thousands of different internal sequences in these species. This review contrasts the events underlying somatic genome reduction in three different ciliates and considers their evolutionary origins and the relationships among their distinct mechanisms for genome remodeling. Public Library of Science 2013-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3731211/ /pubmed/23935529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659 Text en © 2013 Vogt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Vogt, Alexander
Goldman, Aaron David
Mochizuki, Kazufumi
Landweber, Laura F.
Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements
title Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements
title_full Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements
title_fullStr Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements
title_full_unstemmed Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements
title_short Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements
title_sort transposon domestication versus mutualism in ciliate genome rearrangements
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23935529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659
work_keys_str_mv AT vogtalexander transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements
AT goldmanaarondavid transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements
AT mochizukikazufumi transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements
AT landweberlauraf transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements