Cargando…
Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements
Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that resi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23935529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659 |
_version_ | 1782279121650319360 |
---|---|
author | Vogt, Alexander Goldman, Aaron David Mochizuki, Kazufumi Landweber, Laura F. |
author_facet | Vogt, Alexander Goldman, Aaron David Mochizuki, Kazufumi Landweber, Laura F. |
author_sort | Vogt, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that reside in the germline. Three independent studies recently showed that transposase proteins of the DDE/DDD superfamily are indispensible for DNA processing in three distantly related ciliates. In the spirotrich Oxytricha trifallax, high copy-number germline-limited transposons mediate their own excision from the somatic genome but also contribute to programmed genome rearrangement through a remarkable transposon mutualism with the host. By contrast, the genomes of two oligohymenophorean ciliates, Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia, encode homologous PiggyBac-like transposases as single-copy genes in both their germline and somatic genomes. These domesticated transposases are essential for deletion of thousands of different internal sequences in these species. This review contrasts the events underlying somatic genome reduction in three different ciliates and considers their evolutionary origins and the relationships among their distinct mechanisms for genome remodeling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3731211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37312112013-08-09 Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements Vogt, Alexander Goldman, Aaron David Mochizuki, Kazufumi Landweber, Laura F. PLoS Genet Review Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that reside in the germline. Three independent studies recently showed that transposase proteins of the DDE/DDD superfamily are indispensible for DNA processing in three distantly related ciliates. In the spirotrich Oxytricha trifallax, high copy-number germline-limited transposons mediate their own excision from the somatic genome but also contribute to programmed genome rearrangement through a remarkable transposon mutualism with the host. By contrast, the genomes of two oligohymenophorean ciliates, Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia, encode homologous PiggyBac-like transposases as single-copy genes in both their germline and somatic genomes. These domesticated transposases are essential for deletion of thousands of different internal sequences in these species. This review contrasts the events underlying somatic genome reduction in three different ciliates and considers their evolutionary origins and the relationships among their distinct mechanisms for genome remodeling. Public Library of Science 2013-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3731211/ /pubmed/23935529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659 Text en © 2013 Vogt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Vogt, Alexander Goldman, Aaron David Mochizuki, Kazufumi Landweber, Laura F. Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements |
title | Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements |
title_full | Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements |
title_fullStr | Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements |
title_full_unstemmed | Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements |
title_short | Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements |
title_sort | transposon domestication versus mutualism in ciliate genome rearrangements |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23935529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogtalexander transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements AT goldmanaarondavid transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements AT mochizukikazufumi transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements AT landweberlauraf transposondomesticationversusmutualisminciliategenomerearrangements |