Cargando…

A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei)

Standardised diets and trophic level (T (L)) estimates were calculated for 75 ray species from the suborders Myliobatoidei (67 spp.) and Torpedinoidei (8 spp.). Decapod crustaceans (31.71±3.92%) and teleost fishes (16.45±3.43%) made the largest contribution to the standardised diet of the Myliobatoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobsen, Ian P., Bennett, Mike B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071348
_version_ 1782279141754667008
author Jacobsen, Ian P.
Bennett, Mike B.
author_facet Jacobsen, Ian P.
Bennett, Mike B.
author_sort Jacobsen, Ian P.
collection PubMed
description Standardised diets and trophic level (T (L)) estimates were calculated for 75 ray species from the suborders Myliobatoidei (67 spp.) and Torpedinoidei (8 spp.). Decapod crustaceans (31.71±3.92%) and teleost fishes (16.45±3.43%) made the largest contribution to the standardised diet of the Myliobatoidei. Teleost fishes (37.40±16.09%) and polychaete worms (31.96±14.22%) were the most prominent prey categories in the standardised diet of the suborder Torpedinoidei. Cluster analysis identified nine major trophic guilds the largest of which were decapod crustaceans (24 species), teleost fishes (11 species) and molluscs (11 species). Trophic level estimates for rays ranged from 3.10 for Potamotrygon falkneri to 4.24 for Gymnura australis, Torpedo marmorata and T. nobiliana. Secondary consumers with a T (L) <4.00 represented 84% of the species examined, with the remaining 12 species (16%) classified as tertiary consumers (T (L) ≥4.00). Tertiary consumers included electric rays (Torpedo, 3 spp. and Hypnos, 1 sp.), butterfly rays (Gymnura, 4 spp.), stingrays (2 spp.) and Potamotrygonid stingrays (2 spp.). Feeding strategies were identified as the primary factor of influence with respect to Myliobatoidei and Torpedinoidei T (L) estimates with inter-family comparisons providing the greatest insight into Myliobatoidei and Torpedinoidei relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3731297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37312972013-08-09 A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei) Jacobsen, Ian P. Bennett, Mike B. PLoS One Research Article Standardised diets and trophic level (T (L)) estimates were calculated for 75 ray species from the suborders Myliobatoidei (67 spp.) and Torpedinoidei (8 spp.). Decapod crustaceans (31.71±3.92%) and teleost fishes (16.45±3.43%) made the largest contribution to the standardised diet of the Myliobatoidei. Teleost fishes (37.40±16.09%) and polychaete worms (31.96±14.22%) were the most prominent prey categories in the standardised diet of the suborder Torpedinoidei. Cluster analysis identified nine major trophic guilds the largest of which were decapod crustaceans (24 species), teleost fishes (11 species) and molluscs (11 species). Trophic level estimates for rays ranged from 3.10 for Potamotrygon falkneri to 4.24 for Gymnura australis, Torpedo marmorata and T. nobiliana. Secondary consumers with a T (L) <4.00 represented 84% of the species examined, with the remaining 12 species (16%) classified as tertiary consumers (T (L) ≥4.00). Tertiary consumers included electric rays (Torpedo, 3 spp. and Hypnos, 1 sp.), butterfly rays (Gymnura, 4 spp.), stingrays (2 spp.) and Potamotrygonid stingrays (2 spp.). Feeding strategies were identified as the primary factor of influence with respect to Myliobatoidei and Torpedinoidei T (L) estimates with inter-family comparisons providing the greatest insight into Myliobatoidei and Torpedinoidei relationships. Public Library of Science 2013-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3731297/ /pubmed/23936503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071348 Text en © 2013 Jacobsen, Bennett http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jacobsen, Ian P.
Bennett, Mike B.
A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei)
title A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei)
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei)
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei)
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei)
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Feeding and Trophic Level Ecology in Stingrays (Rajiformes; Myliobatoidei) and Electric Rays (Rajiformes: Torpedinoidei)
title_sort comparative analysis of feeding and trophic level ecology in stingrays (rajiformes; myliobatoidei) and electric rays (rajiformes: torpedinoidei)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071348
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsenianp acomparativeanalysisoffeedingandtrophiclevelecologyinstingraysrajiformesmyliobatoideiandelectricraysrajiformestorpedinoidei
AT bennettmikeb acomparativeanalysisoffeedingandtrophiclevelecologyinstingraysrajiformesmyliobatoideiandelectricraysrajiformestorpedinoidei
AT jacobsenianp comparativeanalysisoffeedingandtrophiclevelecologyinstingraysrajiformesmyliobatoideiandelectricraysrajiformestorpedinoidei
AT bennettmikeb comparativeanalysisoffeedingandtrophiclevelecologyinstingraysrajiformesmyliobatoideiandelectricraysrajiformestorpedinoidei