Cargando…

Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of substandard and falsified medicines in the UK. DESIGN: A retrospective review of drug alerts and company-led recalls. SETTING: The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) website search for drug alerts issued between 2001 and 2011. ELIGIBILITY...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almuzaini, Tariq, Sammons, Helen, Choonara, Imti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23883882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002924
_version_ 1782279195717533696
author Almuzaini, Tariq
Sammons, Helen
Choonara, Imti
author_facet Almuzaini, Tariq
Sammons, Helen
Choonara, Imti
author_sort Almuzaini, Tariq
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of substandard and falsified medicines in the UK. DESIGN: A retrospective review of drug alerts and company-led recalls. SETTING: The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) website search for drug alerts issued between 2001 and 2011. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Drug alerts related to quality defect in medicinal products. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relevant data about defective medicines reported in drug alerts and company-led recalls, including description of the defect, type of formulation, year of the alert and category of the alert. RESULTS: There were 280 substandard medicines of which 222 were recalled. The two most frequent problems were contamination (74 incidents) and issues related to packaging (98 incidents). Formulations for parenteral administration (117 incidents) were the formulation most frequently affected. There were 11 falsified medicines, as defined by the MHRA, reported over the 11-year period. The number of defective medicines reported by the MHRA increased 10-fold from 5 in 2001 to 50 in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Substandard medicines are a significant problem in the UK. It is uncertain whether the increasing number of reports relates to improved detection or an increase in the number of substandard medicines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3731779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37317792013-08-02 Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011) Almuzaini, Tariq Sammons, Helen Choonara, Imti BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of substandard and falsified medicines in the UK. DESIGN: A retrospective review of drug alerts and company-led recalls. SETTING: The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) website search for drug alerts issued between 2001 and 2011. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Drug alerts related to quality defect in medicinal products. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relevant data about defective medicines reported in drug alerts and company-led recalls, including description of the defect, type of formulation, year of the alert and category of the alert. RESULTS: There were 280 substandard medicines of which 222 were recalled. The two most frequent problems were contamination (74 incidents) and issues related to packaging (98 incidents). Formulations for parenteral administration (117 incidents) were the formulation most frequently affected. There were 11 falsified medicines, as defined by the MHRA, reported over the 11-year period. The number of defective medicines reported by the MHRA increased 10-fold from 5 in 2001 to 50 in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Substandard medicines are a significant problem in the UK. It is uncertain whether the increasing number of reports relates to improved detection or an increase in the number of substandard medicines. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3731779/ /pubmed/23883882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002924 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Health Policy
Almuzaini, Tariq
Sammons, Helen
Choonara, Imti
Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)
title Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)
title_full Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)
title_fullStr Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)
title_full_unstemmed Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)
title_short Substandard and falsified medicines in the UK: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)
title_sort substandard and falsified medicines in the uk: a retrospective review of drug alerts (2001–2011)
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3731779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23883882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002924
work_keys_str_mv AT almuzainitariq substandardandfalsifiedmedicinesintheukaretrospectivereviewofdrugalerts20012011
AT sammonshelen substandardandfalsifiedmedicinesintheukaretrospectivereviewofdrugalerts20012011
AT choonaraimti substandardandfalsifiedmedicinesintheukaretrospectivereviewofdrugalerts20012011