Cargando…

Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess public and private medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and measures. METHODS: A total of 80 diagnostic laboratories in biosafety level 3 were assessed for the presence of biosafety equipment, dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oladeinde, Bankole Henry, Omoregie, Richard, Odia, Ikponmwonsa, Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro, Imade, Odaro Stanley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.006
_version_ 1782279232297107456
author Oladeinde, Bankole Henry
Omoregie, Richard
Odia, Ikponmwonsa
Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro
Imade, Odaro Stanley
author_facet Oladeinde, Bankole Henry
Omoregie, Richard
Odia, Ikponmwonsa
Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro
Imade, Odaro Stanley
author_sort Oladeinde, Bankole Henry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess public and private medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and measures. METHODS: A total of 80 diagnostic laboratories in biosafety level 3 were assessed for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and compliance rate with biosafety practices. A detailed questionnaire and checklist was used to obtain the relevant information from enlisted laboratories. RESULTS: The results showed the presence of an isolated unit for microbiological work, leak-proof working benches, self-closing doors, emergency exits, fire extinguisher(s), autoclaves, and hand washing sinks in 21.3%, 71.3%, 15.0%, 1.3%, 11.3%, 82.5%, and 67.5%, respectively, of all laboratories surveyed. It was observed that public diagnostic laboratories were significantly more likely to have an isolated unit for microbiological work (p = 0.001), hand washing sink (p = 0.003), and an autoclave (p ≤ 0.001) than private ones. Routine use of hand gloves, biosafety cabinet, and a first aid box was observed in 35.0%, 20.0%, and 2.5%, respectively, of all laboratories examined. Written standard operating procedures, biosafety manuals, and biohazard signs on door entrances were observed in 6.3%, 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively, of all audited laboratories. No biosafety officer(s) or records of previous spills, or injuries and accidents, were observed in all diagnostic laboratories studied. CONCLUSION: In all laboratories (public and private) surveyed, marked deficiencies were observed in the area of administrative control responsible for implementing biosafety. Increased emphasis on provision of biosafety devices and compliance with standard codes of practices issued by relevant authorities is strongly advocated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3732144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37321442013-08-19 Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria Oladeinde, Bankole Henry Omoregie, Richard Odia, Ikponmwonsa Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro Imade, Odaro Stanley Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess public and private medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and measures. METHODS: A total of 80 diagnostic laboratories in biosafety level 3 were assessed for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and compliance rate with biosafety practices. A detailed questionnaire and checklist was used to obtain the relevant information from enlisted laboratories. RESULTS: The results showed the presence of an isolated unit for microbiological work, leak-proof working benches, self-closing doors, emergency exits, fire extinguisher(s), autoclaves, and hand washing sinks in 21.3%, 71.3%, 15.0%, 1.3%, 11.3%, 82.5%, and 67.5%, respectively, of all laboratories surveyed. It was observed that public diagnostic laboratories were significantly more likely to have an isolated unit for microbiological work (p = 0.001), hand washing sink (p = 0.003), and an autoclave (p ≤ 0.001) than private ones. Routine use of hand gloves, biosafety cabinet, and a first aid box was observed in 35.0%, 20.0%, and 2.5%, respectively, of all laboratories examined. Written standard operating procedures, biosafety manuals, and biohazard signs on door entrances were observed in 6.3%, 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively, of all audited laboratories. No biosafety officer(s) or records of previous spills, or injuries and accidents, were observed in all diagnostic laboratories studied. CONCLUSION: In all laboratories (public and private) surveyed, marked deficiencies were observed in the area of administrative control responsible for implementing biosafety. Increased emphasis on provision of biosafety devices and compliance with standard codes of practices issued by relevant authorities is strongly advocated. 2013-04-25 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3732144/ /pubmed/23961333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.006 Text en © 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oladeinde, Bankole Henry
Omoregie, Richard
Odia, Ikponmwonsa
Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro
Imade, Odaro Stanley
Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria
title Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria
title_full Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria
title_fullStr Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria
title_short Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria
title_sort biorisk assessment of medical diagnostic laboratories in nigeria
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.006
work_keys_str_mv AT oladeindebankolehenry bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria
AT omoregierichard bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria
AT odiaikponmwonsa bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria
AT osakueeguagieosareniro bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria
AT imadeodarostanley bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria