Cargando…
Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess public and private medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and measures. METHODS: A total of 80 diagnostic laboratories in biosafety level 3 were assessed for the presence of biosafety equipment, dev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.006 |
_version_ | 1782279232297107456 |
---|---|
author | Oladeinde, Bankole Henry Omoregie, Richard Odia, Ikponmwonsa Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro Imade, Odaro Stanley |
author_facet | Oladeinde, Bankole Henry Omoregie, Richard Odia, Ikponmwonsa Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro Imade, Odaro Stanley |
author_sort | Oladeinde, Bankole Henry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess public and private medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and measures. METHODS: A total of 80 diagnostic laboratories in biosafety level 3 were assessed for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and compliance rate with biosafety practices. A detailed questionnaire and checklist was used to obtain the relevant information from enlisted laboratories. RESULTS: The results showed the presence of an isolated unit for microbiological work, leak-proof working benches, self-closing doors, emergency exits, fire extinguisher(s), autoclaves, and hand washing sinks in 21.3%, 71.3%, 15.0%, 1.3%, 11.3%, 82.5%, and 67.5%, respectively, of all laboratories surveyed. It was observed that public diagnostic laboratories were significantly more likely to have an isolated unit for microbiological work (p = 0.001), hand washing sink (p = 0.003), and an autoclave (p ≤ 0.001) than private ones. Routine use of hand gloves, biosafety cabinet, and a first aid box was observed in 35.0%, 20.0%, and 2.5%, respectively, of all laboratories examined. Written standard operating procedures, biosafety manuals, and biohazard signs on door entrances were observed in 6.3%, 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively, of all audited laboratories. No biosafety officer(s) or records of previous spills, or injuries and accidents, were observed in all diagnostic laboratories studied. CONCLUSION: In all laboratories (public and private) surveyed, marked deficiencies were observed in the area of administrative control responsible for implementing biosafety. Increased emphasis on provision of biosafety devices and compliance with standard codes of practices issued by relevant authorities is strongly advocated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3732144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37321442013-08-19 Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria Oladeinde, Bankole Henry Omoregie, Richard Odia, Ikponmwonsa Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro Imade, Odaro Stanley Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess public and private medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and measures. METHODS: A total of 80 diagnostic laboratories in biosafety level 3 were assessed for the presence of biosafety equipment, devices, and compliance rate with biosafety practices. A detailed questionnaire and checklist was used to obtain the relevant information from enlisted laboratories. RESULTS: The results showed the presence of an isolated unit for microbiological work, leak-proof working benches, self-closing doors, emergency exits, fire extinguisher(s), autoclaves, and hand washing sinks in 21.3%, 71.3%, 15.0%, 1.3%, 11.3%, 82.5%, and 67.5%, respectively, of all laboratories surveyed. It was observed that public diagnostic laboratories were significantly more likely to have an isolated unit for microbiological work (p = 0.001), hand washing sink (p = 0.003), and an autoclave (p ≤ 0.001) than private ones. Routine use of hand gloves, biosafety cabinet, and a first aid box was observed in 35.0%, 20.0%, and 2.5%, respectively, of all laboratories examined. Written standard operating procedures, biosafety manuals, and biohazard signs on door entrances were observed in 6.3%, 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively, of all audited laboratories. No biosafety officer(s) or records of previous spills, or injuries and accidents, were observed in all diagnostic laboratories studied. CONCLUSION: In all laboratories (public and private) surveyed, marked deficiencies were observed in the area of administrative control responsible for implementing biosafety. Increased emphasis on provision of biosafety devices and compliance with standard codes of practices issued by relevant authorities is strongly advocated. 2013-04-25 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3732144/ /pubmed/23961333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.006 Text en © 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oladeinde, Bankole Henry Omoregie, Richard Odia, Ikponmwonsa Osakue, Eguagie Osareniro Imade, Odaro Stanley Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria |
title | Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria |
title_full | Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria |
title_fullStr | Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria |
title_full_unstemmed | Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria |
title_short | Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria |
title_sort | biorisk assessment of medical diagnostic laboratories in nigeria |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oladeindebankolehenry bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria AT omoregierichard bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria AT odiaikponmwonsa bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria AT osakueeguagieosareniro bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria AT imadeodarostanley bioriskassessmentofmedicaldiagnosticlaboratoriesinnigeria |