Cargando…
The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks
BACKGROUND: To determine the influence of lifting speed and type on peak and cumulative back compressive force (BCF) and shoulder moment (SM) loads during symmetric lifting. Another aim of the study was to compare static and dynamic lifting models. METHODS: Ten male participants performed a floor-to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.001 |
_version_ | 1782279232518356992 |
---|---|
author | Greenland, Kasey O. Merryweather, Andrew S. Bloswick, Donald S. |
author_facet | Greenland, Kasey O. Merryweather, Andrew S. Bloswick, Donald S. |
author_sort | Greenland, Kasey O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To determine the influence of lifting speed and type on peak and cumulative back compressive force (BCF) and shoulder moment (SM) loads during symmetric lifting. Another aim of the study was to compare static and dynamic lifting models. METHODS: Ten male participants performed a floor-to-shoulder, floor-to-waist, and waist-to-shoulder lift at three different speeds [slow (0.34 m/s), medium (0.44 m/s), and fast (0.64 m/s)], and with two different loads [light (2.25 kg) and heavy (9 kg)]. Two-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were determined. A three-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to calculate peak and cumulative loading of BCF and SM for light and heavy loads. RESULTS: Peak BCF was significantly different between slow and fast lifting speeds (p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 20% between fast and slow lifts. The cumulative loading of BCF and SM was significantly different between fast and slow lifting speeds (p < 0.001), with mean differences ≥80%. CONCLUSION: Based on peak values, BCF is highest for fast speeds, but the BCF cumulative loading is highest for slow speeds, with the largest difference between fast and slow lifts. This may imply that a slow lifting speed is at least as hazardous as a fast lifting speed. It is important to consider the duration of lift when determining risks for back and shoulder injuries due to lifting and that peak values alone are likely not sufficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3732145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37321452013-08-19 The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks Greenland, Kasey O. Merryweather, Andrew S. Bloswick, Donald S. Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: To determine the influence of lifting speed and type on peak and cumulative back compressive force (BCF) and shoulder moment (SM) loads during symmetric lifting. Another aim of the study was to compare static and dynamic lifting models. METHODS: Ten male participants performed a floor-to-shoulder, floor-to-waist, and waist-to-shoulder lift at three different speeds [slow (0.34 m/s), medium (0.44 m/s), and fast (0.64 m/s)], and with two different loads [light (2.25 kg) and heavy (9 kg)]. Two-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were determined. A three-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to calculate peak and cumulative loading of BCF and SM for light and heavy loads. RESULTS: Peak BCF was significantly different between slow and fast lifting speeds (p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 20% between fast and slow lifts. The cumulative loading of BCF and SM was significantly different between fast and slow lifting speeds (p < 0.001), with mean differences ≥80%. CONCLUSION: Based on peak values, BCF is highest for fast speeds, but the BCF cumulative loading is highest for slow speeds, with the largest difference between fast and slow lifts. This may imply that a slow lifting speed is at least as hazardous as a fast lifting speed. It is important to consider the duration of lift when determining risks for back and shoulder injuries due to lifting and that peak values alone are likely not sufficient. 2013-04-12 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3732145/ /pubmed/23961334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.001 Text en © 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Greenland, Kasey O. Merryweather, Andrew S. Bloswick, Donald S. The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks |
title | The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks |
title_full | The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks |
title_short | The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks |
title_sort | effect of lifting speed on cumulative and peak biomechanical loading for symmetric lifting tasks |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenlandkaseyo theeffectofliftingspeedoncumulativeandpeakbiomechanicalloadingforsymmetricliftingtasks AT merryweatherandrews theeffectofliftingspeedoncumulativeandpeakbiomechanicalloadingforsymmetricliftingtasks AT bloswickdonalds theeffectofliftingspeedoncumulativeandpeakbiomechanicalloadingforsymmetricliftingtasks AT greenlandkaseyo effectofliftingspeedoncumulativeandpeakbiomechanicalloadingforsymmetricliftingtasks AT merryweatherandrews effectofliftingspeedoncumulativeandpeakbiomechanicalloadingforsymmetricliftingtasks AT bloswickdonalds effectofliftingspeedoncumulativeandpeakbiomechanicalloadingforsymmetricliftingtasks |