Cargando…

Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature

The objective of this article is to systematically review the currently available literature to formulate evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions for clinical practice and to establish recommendations for future research. Articles from PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somford, Matthijs P., van den Bekerom, Michel P. J., Kloen, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0168-5
_version_ 1782279294540578816
author Somford, Matthijs P.
van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
Kloen, Peter
author_facet Somford, Matthijs P.
van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
Kloen, Peter
author_sort Somford, Matthijs P.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this article is to systematically review the currently available literature to formulate evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions for clinical practice and to establish recommendations for future research. Articles from PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Clinical Trial Register, and EMBASE, that presented data concerning treatment of nonunions of femoral shaft fractures in adult humans, were included for data extraction and analysis. The search was restricted to articles from January 1970 to March 2011 written in the English, German, or Dutch languages. Articles containing data that were thought to have been presented previously were used once. Reports on nonunion after periprosthetic fractures, review articles, expert opinions, abstracts from scientific meetings, and case reports on 5 or fewer patients were excluded. The data that were extracted from the relevant articles included: type of nonunion, type of initial and secondary treatments, follow-up, union rate, and general complications. Most studies had different inclusion criteria and outcome measures, thus prohibiting a proper meta-analysis. Therefore, only the union rate and number of complications were compared between the different treatments. Methodological quality was assessed by assigning levels of evidence as previously defined by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. This systematic review provides evidence in favour of plating if a nail is the first treatment; after failed plate fixation, nailing has a 96 % union rate. After failed nailing, augmentative plating results in a 96 % union rate compared to 73 % in the exchange nailing group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3732674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37326742013-08-05 Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature Somford, Matthijs P. van den Bekerom, Michel P. J. Kloen, Peter Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Review The objective of this article is to systematically review the currently available literature to formulate evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions for clinical practice and to establish recommendations for future research. Articles from PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Clinical Trial Register, and EMBASE, that presented data concerning treatment of nonunions of femoral shaft fractures in adult humans, were included for data extraction and analysis. The search was restricted to articles from January 1970 to March 2011 written in the English, German, or Dutch languages. Articles containing data that were thought to have been presented previously were used once. Reports on nonunion after periprosthetic fractures, review articles, expert opinions, abstracts from scientific meetings, and case reports on 5 or fewer patients were excluded. The data that were extracted from the relevant articles included: type of nonunion, type of initial and secondary treatments, follow-up, union rate, and general complications. Most studies had different inclusion criteria and outcome measures, thus prohibiting a proper meta-analysis. Therefore, only the union rate and number of complications were compared between the different treatments. Methodological quality was assessed by assigning levels of evidence as previously defined by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. This systematic review provides evidence in favour of plating if a nail is the first treatment; after failed plate fixation, nailing has a 96 % union rate. After failed nailing, augmentative plating results in a 96 % union rate compared to 73 % in the exchange nailing group. Springer Milan 2013-07-27 2013-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3732674/ /pubmed/23892497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0168-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Somford, Matthijs P.
van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
Kloen, Peter
Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature
title Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature
title_full Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature
title_short Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature
title_sort operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0168-5
work_keys_str_mv AT somfordmatthijsp operativetreatmentforfemoralshaftnonunionsasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT vandenbekerommichelpj operativetreatmentforfemoralshaftnonunionsasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT kloenpeter operativetreatmentforfemoralshaftnonunionsasystematicreviewoftheliterature