Cargando…

Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: CT imaging is widely used for response evaluation of immunotherapy in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, this kind of treatment may not immediately be cytoreductive, although the treatment is successful. This poses new demands on imaging modalities. Positro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilles, Rozemarie, de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee, Mulders, Peter F. A., Oyen, Wim J. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21739122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0723-y
_version_ 1782279299322085376
author Gilles, Rozemarie
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
Mulders, Peter F. A.
Oyen, Wim J. G.
author_facet Gilles, Rozemarie
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
Mulders, Peter F. A.
Oyen, Wim J. G.
author_sort Gilles, Rozemarie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CT imaging is widely used for response evaluation of immunotherapy in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, this kind of treatment may not immediately be cytoreductive, although the treatment is successful. This poses new demands on imaging modalities. Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) proved to be useful in monitoring the effect of several antitumour treatments. We investigated the potential of FDG-PET for the evaluation of response to immunotherapy. METHODS: In seven patients with metastasized RCC, who were treated with either interferon-alpha (IFN-α) monotherapy or a combination of IFN-α, interleukin-2 and 5-fluorouracil, FDG-PET was performed prior and after 5 and 9 weeks of treatment. Quantitative changes of glucose metabolic rate (MR(Glu)) were compared with changes in tumour size on CT imaging using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and to survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS: No consistent changes in MR(Glu) were observed within different response groups. And no correlation with CT imaging, neither with survival or progression-free survival, was found. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the positive results reported on (chemo) therapy response evaluation with FDG-PET in different malignancies, this imaging modality appears not useful in response monitoring of immunotherapeutic modalities in RCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3732769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37327692013-08-05 Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma Gilles, Rozemarie de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Mulders, Peter F. A. Oyen, Wim J. G. World J Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: CT imaging is widely used for response evaluation of immunotherapy in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, this kind of treatment may not immediately be cytoreductive, although the treatment is successful. This poses new demands on imaging modalities. Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) proved to be useful in monitoring the effect of several antitumour treatments. We investigated the potential of FDG-PET for the evaluation of response to immunotherapy. METHODS: In seven patients with metastasized RCC, who were treated with either interferon-alpha (IFN-α) monotherapy or a combination of IFN-α, interleukin-2 and 5-fluorouracil, FDG-PET was performed prior and after 5 and 9 weeks of treatment. Quantitative changes of glucose metabolic rate (MR(Glu)) were compared with changes in tumour size on CT imaging using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and to survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS: No consistent changes in MR(Glu) were observed within different response groups. And no correlation with CT imaging, neither with survival or progression-free survival, was found. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the positive results reported on (chemo) therapy response evaluation with FDG-PET in different malignancies, this imaging modality appears not useful in response monitoring of immunotherapeutic modalities in RCC. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011-07-08 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3732769/ /pubmed/21739122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0723-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gilles, Rozemarie
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
Mulders, Peter F. A.
Oyen, Wim J. G.
Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma
title Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma
title_full Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma
title_short Immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma
title_sort immunotherapy response evaluation with (18)f-fdg-pet in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21739122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0723-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gillesrozemarie immunotherapyresponseevaluationwith18ffdgpetinpatientswithadvancedstagerenalcellcarcinoma
AT degeusoeilioefee immunotherapyresponseevaluationwith18ffdgpetinpatientswithadvancedstagerenalcellcarcinoma
AT mulderspeterfa immunotherapyresponseevaluationwith18ffdgpetinpatientswithadvancedstagerenalcellcarcinoma
AT oyenwimjg immunotherapyresponseevaluationwith18ffdgpetinpatientswithadvancedstagerenalcellcarcinoma