Cargando…

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost utility of a universally provided early years parenting programme. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Early years centres in four deprived areas of South Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Families with child...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simkiss, D E, Snooks, H A, Stallard, N, Kimani, P K, Sewell, B, Fitzsimmons, D, Anthony, R, Winstanley, S, Wilson, L, Phillips, C J, Stewart-Brown, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23906953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002851
_version_ 1782279350264004608
author Simkiss, D E
Snooks, H A
Stallard, N
Kimani, P K
Sewell, B
Fitzsimmons, D
Anthony, R
Winstanley, S
Wilson, L
Phillips, C J
Stewart-Brown, S
author_facet Simkiss, D E
Snooks, H A
Stallard, N
Kimani, P K
Sewell, B
Fitzsimmons, D
Anthony, R
Winstanley, S
Wilson, L
Phillips, C J
Stewart-Brown, S
author_sort Simkiss, D E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost utility of a universally provided early years parenting programme. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Early years centres in four deprived areas of South Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Families with children aged between 2 and 4 years. 286 families were recruited and randomly allocated to the intervention or waiting list control. INTERVENTION: The Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP), a 10-week course with weekly 2 h facilitated group sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Negative and supportive parenting, child and parental well-being and costs assessed before the intervention, following the course (3 months) and at 9 months using standardised measures. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between trial arms at 3 or 9 months. With ‘+’ indicating improvement, difference in change in negative parenting score at 9 months was +0.90 (95%CI −1.90 to 3.69); in supportive parenting, +0.17 (95%CI −0.61 to 0.94); and 12 of the 17 secondary outcomes showed a non-significant positive effect in the FLNP arm. Based on changes in parental well-being (SF-12), the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was estimated to be £34 913 (range 21 485–46 578) over 5 years and £18 954 (range 11 664–25 287) over 10 years. Probability of cost per QALY gained below £30 000 was 47% at 5 years and 57% at 10 years. Attendance was low: 34% of intervention families attended no sessions (n=48); only 47% completed the course (n=68). Also, 19% of control families attended a parenting programme before 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our trial has not found evidence of clinical or cost utility for the FLNP in a universal setting. However, low levels of exposure and contamination mean that uncertainty remains. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13919732.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37333012013-08-05 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial Simkiss, D E Snooks, H A Stallard, N Kimani, P K Sewell, B Fitzsimmons, D Anthony, R Winstanley, S Wilson, L Phillips, C J Stewart-Brown, S BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost utility of a universally provided early years parenting programme. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Early years centres in four deprived areas of South Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Families with children aged between 2 and 4 years. 286 families were recruited and randomly allocated to the intervention or waiting list control. INTERVENTION: The Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP), a 10-week course with weekly 2 h facilitated group sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Negative and supportive parenting, child and parental well-being and costs assessed before the intervention, following the course (3 months) and at 9 months using standardised measures. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between trial arms at 3 or 9 months. With ‘+’ indicating improvement, difference in change in negative parenting score at 9 months was +0.90 (95%CI −1.90 to 3.69); in supportive parenting, +0.17 (95%CI −0.61 to 0.94); and 12 of the 17 secondary outcomes showed a non-significant positive effect in the FLNP arm. Based on changes in parental well-being (SF-12), the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was estimated to be £34 913 (range 21 485–46 578) over 5 years and £18 954 (range 11 664–25 287) over 10 years. Probability of cost per QALY gained below £30 000 was 47% at 5 years and 57% at 10 years. Attendance was low: 34% of intervention families attended no sessions (n=48); only 47% completed the course (n=68). Also, 19% of control families attended a parenting programme before 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our trial has not found evidence of clinical or cost utility for the FLNP in a universal setting. However, low levels of exposure and contamination mean that uncertainty remains. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13919732. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3733301/ /pubmed/23906953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002851 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Simkiss, D E
Snooks, H A
Stallard, N
Kimani, P K
Sewell, B
Fitzsimmons, D
Anthony, R
Winstanley, S
Wilson, L
Phillips, C J
Stewart-Brown, S
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23906953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002851
work_keys_str_mv AT simkissde effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT snooksha effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stallardn effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kimanipk effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sewellb effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fitzsimmonsd effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT anthonyr effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT winstanleys effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsonl effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT phillipscj effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stewartbrowns effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofauniversalparentingskillsprogrammeindeprivedcommunitiesmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial