Cargando…

Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has endorsed the use of molecular methods for the detection of TB and drug-resistant TB as a rapid alternative to culture-based systems. In South Africa, the Xpert MTB/Rif assay and the GenoType MTBDRplus have been implemented into reference laboratories for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Maunank, Chihota, Violet, Coetzee, Gerrit, Churchyard, Gavin, Dorman, Susan E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-352
_version_ 1782279370203725824
author Shah, Maunank
Chihota, Violet
Coetzee, Gerrit
Churchyard, Gavin
Dorman, Susan E
author_facet Shah, Maunank
Chihota, Violet
Coetzee, Gerrit
Churchyard, Gavin
Dorman, Susan E
author_sort Shah, Maunank
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has endorsed the use of molecular methods for the detection of TB and drug-resistant TB as a rapid alternative to culture-based systems. In South Africa, the Xpert MTB/Rif assay and the GenoType MTBDRplus have been implemented into reference laboratories for diagnosis of TB and drug-resistance, but their costs have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: We conducted a detailed reference laboratory cost analysis of new rapid molecular assays (Xpert and MTBDRplus) for tuberculosis testing and drug-resistance testing in South Africa, and compared with the costs of conventional approaches involving sputum microscopy, liquid mycobacterial culture, and phenotypic drug sensitivity testing. RESULTS: From a laboratory perspective, Xpert MTB/RIF cost $14.93/sample and the MTBDRplus line probe assay cost $23.46/sample, compared to $16.88/sample using conventional automated liquid culture-based methods. Laboratory costs of Xpert and MTBDRplus were most influenced by cost of consumables (60-80%). CONCLUSIONS: At current public sector pricing, Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus are comparable in cost to mycobacterial culture and conventional drug sensitivity testing. Overall, reference laboratories must balance costs with performance characteristics and the need for rapid results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37336092013-08-06 Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa Shah, Maunank Chihota, Violet Coetzee, Gerrit Churchyard, Gavin Dorman, Susan E BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has endorsed the use of molecular methods for the detection of TB and drug-resistant TB as a rapid alternative to culture-based systems. In South Africa, the Xpert MTB/Rif assay and the GenoType MTBDRplus have been implemented into reference laboratories for diagnosis of TB and drug-resistance, but their costs have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: We conducted a detailed reference laboratory cost analysis of new rapid molecular assays (Xpert and MTBDRplus) for tuberculosis testing and drug-resistance testing in South Africa, and compared with the costs of conventional approaches involving sputum microscopy, liquid mycobacterial culture, and phenotypic drug sensitivity testing. RESULTS: From a laboratory perspective, Xpert MTB/RIF cost $14.93/sample and the MTBDRplus line probe assay cost $23.46/sample, compared to $16.88/sample using conventional automated liquid culture-based methods. Laboratory costs of Xpert and MTBDRplus were most influenced by cost of consumables (60-80%). CONCLUSIONS: At current public sector pricing, Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus are comparable in cost to mycobacterial culture and conventional drug sensitivity testing. Overall, reference laboratories must balance costs with performance characteristics and the need for rapid results. BioMed Central 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3733609/ /pubmed/23895665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-352 Text en Copyright © 2013 Shah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shah, Maunank
Chihota, Violet
Coetzee, Gerrit
Churchyard, Gavin
Dorman, Susan E
Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa
title Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa
title_full Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa
title_fullStr Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa
title_short Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa
title_sort comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-352
work_keys_str_mv AT shahmaunank comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica
AT chihotaviolet comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica
AT coetzeegerrit comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica
AT churchyardgavin comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica
AT dormansusane comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica