Cargando…
Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has endorsed the use of molecular methods for the detection of TB and drug-resistant TB as a rapid alternative to culture-based systems. In South Africa, the Xpert MTB/Rif assay and the GenoType MTBDRplus have been implemented into reference laboratories for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-352 |
_version_ | 1782279370203725824 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Maunank Chihota, Violet Coetzee, Gerrit Churchyard, Gavin Dorman, Susan E |
author_facet | Shah, Maunank Chihota, Violet Coetzee, Gerrit Churchyard, Gavin Dorman, Susan E |
author_sort | Shah, Maunank |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has endorsed the use of molecular methods for the detection of TB and drug-resistant TB as a rapid alternative to culture-based systems. In South Africa, the Xpert MTB/Rif assay and the GenoType MTBDRplus have been implemented into reference laboratories for diagnosis of TB and drug-resistance, but their costs have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: We conducted a detailed reference laboratory cost analysis of new rapid molecular assays (Xpert and MTBDRplus) for tuberculosis testing and drug-resistance testing in South Africa, and compared with the costs of conventional approaches involving sputum microscopy, liquid mycobacterial culture, and phenotypic drug sensitivity testing. RESULTS: From a laboratory perspective, Xpert MTB/RIF cost $14.93/sample and the MTBDRplus line probe assay cost $23.46/sample, compared to $16.88/sample using conventional automated liquid culture-based methods. Laboratory costs of Xpert and MTBDRplus were most influenced by cost of consumables (60-80%). CONCLUSIONS: At current public sector pricing, Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus are comparable in cost to mycobacterial culture and conventional drug sensitivity testing. Overall, reference laboratories must balance costs with performance characteristics and the need for rapid results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3733609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37336092013-08-06 Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa Shah, Maunank Chihota, Violet Coetzee, Gerrit Churchyard, Gavin Dorman, Susan E BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has endorsed the use of molecular methods for the detection of TB and drug-resistant TB as a rapid alternative to culture-based systems. In South Africa, the Xpert MTB/Rif assay and the GenoType MTBDRplus have been implemented into reference laboratories for diagnosis of TB and drug-resistance, but their costs have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: We conducted a detailed reference laboratory cost analysis of new rapid molecular assays (Xpert and MTBDRplus) for tuberculosis testing and drug-resistance testing in South Africa, and compared with the costs of conventional approaches involving sputum microscopy, liquid mycobacterial culture, and phenotypic drug sensitivity testing. RESULTS: From a laboratory perspective, Xpert MTB/RIF cost $14.93/sample and the MTBDRplus line probe assay cost $23.46/sample, compared to $16.88/sample using conventional automated liquid culture-based methods. Laboratory costs of Xpert and MTBDRplus were most influenced by cost of consumables (60-80%). CONCLUSIONS: At current public sector pricing, Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus are comparable in cost to mycobacterial culture and conventional drug sensitivity testing. Overall, reference laboratories must balance costs with performance characteristics and the need for rapid results. BioMed Central 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3733609/ /pubmed/23895665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-352 Text en Copyright © 2013 Shah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shah, Maunank Chihota, Violet Coetzee, Gerrit Churchyard, Gavin Dorman, Susan E Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa |
title | Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa |
title_full | Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa |
title_fullStr | Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa |
title_short | Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa |
title_sort | comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in south africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahmaunank comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica AT chihotaviolet comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica AT coetzeegerrit comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica AT churchyardgavin comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica AT dormansusane comparisonoflaboratorycostsofrapidmoleculartestsandconventionaldiagnosticsfordetectionoftuberculosisanddrugresistanttuberculosisinsouthafrica |