Cargando…

A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effect of small unconditional non-monetary incentives on survey response rates amongst GPs or medical practitioners. This study assessed the effectiveness of offering a small unconditional non-financial incentive to increase survey response rates amongst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pit, Sabrina Winona, Hansen, Vibeke, Ewald, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23899116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-108
_version_ 1782279371950653440
author Pit, Sabrina Winona
Hansen, Vibeke
Ewald, Dan
author_facet Pit, Sabrina Winona
Hansen, Vibeke
Ewald, Dan
author_sort Pit, Sabrina Winona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effect of small unconditional non-monetary incentives on survey response rates amongst GPs or medical practitioners. This study assessed the effectiveness of offering a small unconditional non-financial incentive to increase survey response rates amongst general practitioners within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: An RCT was conducted within a general practice survey that investigated how to prolong working lives amongst ageing GPs in Australia. GPs (n = 125) were randomised to receive an attractive pen or no pen during their first invitation for participation in a survey. GPs could elect to complete the survey online or via mail. Two follow up reminders were sent without a pen to both groups. The main outcome measure was response rates. RESULTS: The response rate for GPs who received a pen was higher in the intervention group (61.9%) compared to the control group (46.8%). This study did not find a statistically significant effect of a small unconditional non-financial incentive (in the form of a pen) on survey response rates amongst GPs (Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.85 (0.91 to 3.77). No GPs completed the online version. CONCLUSION: A small unconditional non-financial incentives, in the form of a pen, may improve response rates for GPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37336172013-08-06 A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study Pit, Sabrina Winona Hansen, Vibeke Ewald, Dan BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effect of small unconditional non-monetary incentives on survey response rates amongst GPs or medical practitioners. This study assessed the effectiveness of offering a small unconditional non-financial incentive to increase survey response rates amongst general practitioners within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: An RCT was conducted within a general practice survey that investigated how to prolong working lives amongst ageing GPs in Australia. GPs (n = 125) were randomised to receive an attractive pen or no pen during their first invitation for participation in a survey. GPs could elect to complete the survey online or via mail. Two follow up reminders were sent without a pen to both groups. The main outcome measure was response rates. RESULTS: The response rate for GPs who received a pen was higher in the intervention group (61.9%) compared to the control group (46.8%). This study did not find a statistically significant effect of a small unconditional non-financial incentive (in the form of a pen) on survey response rates amongst GPs (Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.85 (0.91 to 3.77). No GPs completed the online version. CONCLUSION: A small unconditional non-financial incentives, in the form of a pen, may improve response rates for GPs. BioMed Central 2013-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3733617/ /pubmed/23899116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-108 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pit, Sabrina Winona
Hansen, Vibeke
Ewald, Dan
A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
title A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
title_full A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
title_fullStr A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
title_full_unstemmed A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
title_short A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
title_sort small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (gps): a randomised controlled trial study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23899116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-108
work_keys_str_mv AT pitsabrinawinona asmallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT hansenvibeke asmallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT ewalddan asmallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT pitsabrinawinona smallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT hansenvibeke smallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT ewalddan smallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy