Cargando…
A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effect of small unconditional non-monetary incentives on survey response rates amongst GPs or medical practitioners. This study assessed the effectiveness of offering a small unconditional non-financial incentive to increase survey response rates amongst...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23899116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-108 |
_version_ | 1782279371950653440 |
---|---|
author | Pit, Sabrina Winona Hansen, Vibeke Ewald, Dan |
author_facet | Pit, Sabrina Winona Hansen, Vibeke Ewald, Dan |
author_sort | Pit, Sabrina Winona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effect of small unconditional non-monetary incentives on survey response rates amongst GPs or medical practitioners. This study assessed the effectiveness of offering a small unconditional non-financial incentive to increase survey response rates amongst general practitioners within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: An RCT was conducted within a general practice survey that investigated how to prolong working lives amongst ageing GPs in Australia. GPs (n = 125) were randomised to receive an attractive pen or no pen during their first invitation for participation in a survey. GPs could elect to complete the survey online or via mail. Two follow up reminders were sent without a pen to both groups. The main outcome measure was response rates. RESULTS: The response rate for GPs who received a pen was higher in the intervention group (61.9%) compared to the control group (46.8%). This study did not find a statistically significant effect of a small unconditional non-financial incentive (in the form of a pen) on survey response rates amongst GPs (Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.85 (0.91 to 3.77). No GPs completed the online version. CONCLUSION: A small unconditional non-financial incentives, in the form of a pen, may improve response rates for GPs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3733617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37336172013-08-06 A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study Pit, Sabrina Winona Hansen, Vibeke Ewald, Dan BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effect of small unconditional non-monetary incentives on survey response rates amongst GPs or medical practitioners. This study assessed the effectiveness of offering a small unconditional non-financial incentive to increase survey response rates amongst general practitioners within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: An RCT was conducted within a general practice survey that investigated how to prolong working lives amongst ageing GPs in Australia. GPs (n = 125) were randomised to receive an attractive pen or no pen during their first invitation for participation in a survey. GPs could elect to complete the survey online or via mail. Two follow up reminders were sent without a pen to both groups. The main outcome measure was response rates. RESULTS: The response rate for GPs who received a pen was higher in the intervention group (61.9%) compared to the control group (46.8%). This study did not find a statistically significant effect of a small unconditional non-financial incentive (in the form of a pen) on survey response rates amongst GPs (Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.85 (0.91 to 3.77). No GPs completed the online version. CONCLUSION: A small unconditional non-financial incentives, in the form of a pen, may improve response rates for GPs. BioMed Central 2013-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3733617/ /pubmed/23899116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-108 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pit, Sabrina Winona Hansen, Vibeke Ewald, Dan A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study |
title | A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study |
title_full | A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study |
title_fullStr | A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study |
title_full_unstemmed | A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study |
title_short | A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study |
title_sort | small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (gps): a randomised controlled trial study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23899116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pitsabrinawinona asmallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT hansenvibeke asmallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT ewalddan asmallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT pitsabrinawinona smallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT hansenvibeke smallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT ewalddan smallunconditionalnonfinancialincentivesuggestsanincreaseinsurveyresponseratesamongstoldergeneralpractitionersgpsarandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy |