Cargando…

Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI

BACKGROUND: Obesity (abdominal adiposity) is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and the most used methods to measure the adiposity are body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD). OBJECTIVE: To correlate BMI, WC, and SAD with biochemical parameters a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Souza, Natalia Cavalheri, de Oliveira, Erick Prado
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23856008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2251-6581-12-41
_version_ 1782279373328482304
author de Souza, Natalia Cavalheri
de Oliveira, Erick Prado
author_facet de Souza, Natalia Cavalheri
de Oliveira, Erick Prado
author_sort de Souza, Natalia Cavalheri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity (abdominal adiposity) is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and the most used methods to measure the adiposity are body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD). OBJECTIVE: To correlate BMI, WC, and SAD with biochemical parameters and blood pressure in adults. METHODS: A non-experimental exploratory/descriptive and cross sectional study was developed and it was assessed 133 subjects (59 men and 74 women) aging between 18 and 87 years. It was registered the patients’ weight (kg), height (m), BMI (kg/m(2)), WC (cm) and SAD (cm), and these parameters were correlated with glycemia, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c and blood pressure. RESULTS: After adjustment for gender and age, it was observed a positive correlation between SAD and systolic arterial blood pressure (r = 0.20), glycemia (r = 0.20), triglycerides (r = 0.32), LDL (r = 0.26), total cholesterol (TC) (r = 0.33), and a negative correlation with HDL-c (r = −0.21) (p < 0.05). It was observed a positive correlation between WC and systolic arterial blood pressure (r = 0.14), triglycerides (r = 0.31), total cholesterol (r = 0.21), and a negative correlation with HDL-c (r = −0.24) (p < 0.05). BMI showed a positive correlation with systolic arterial blood pressure (r = 0.22), total cholesterol (r = 0.20), and triglycerides (r = 0.23) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SAD correlated with almost all the cardiovascular risk factors analyzed and it might be considered the best predictor of abdominal fat and cardiovascular risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2251-6581-12-41) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37336222013-08-06 Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI de Souza, Natalia Cavalheri de Oliveira, Erick Prado J Diabetes Metab Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Obesity (abdominal adiposity) is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and the most used methods to measure the adiposity are body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD). OBJECTIVE: To correlate BMI, WC, and SAD with biochemical parameters and blood pressure in adults. METHODS: A non-experimental exploratory/descriptive and cross sectional study was developed and it was assessed 133 subjects (59 men and 74 women) aging between 18 and 87 years. It was registered the patients’ weight (kg), height (m), BMI (kg/m(2)), WC (cm) and SAD (cm), and these parameters were correlated with glycemia, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c and blood pressure. RESULTS: After adjustment for gender and age, it was observed a positive correlation between SAD and systolic arterial blood pressure (r = 0.20), glycemia (r = 0.20), triglycerides (r = 0.32), LDL (r = 0.26), total cholesterol (TC) (r = 0.33), and a negative correlation with HDL-c (r = −0.21) (p < 0.05). It was observed a positive correlation between WC and systolic arterial blood pressure (r = 0.14), triglycerides (r = 0.31), total cholesterol (r = 0.21), and a negative correlation with HDL-c (r = −0.24) (p < 0.05). BMI showed a positive correlation with systolic arterial blood pressure (r = 0.22), total cholesterol (r = 0.20), and triglycerides (r = 0.23) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SAD correlated with almost all the cardiovascular risk factors analyzed and it might be considered the best predictor of abdominal fat and cardiovascular risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2251-6581-12-41) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2013-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3733622/ /pubmed/23856008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2251-6581-12-41 Text en © de Souza and de Oliveira; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Souza, Natalia Cavalheri
de Oliveira, Erick Prado
Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
title Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
title_full Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
title_fullStr Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
title_short Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI
title_sort sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and bmi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23856008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2251-6581-12-41
work_keys_str_mv AT desouzanataliacavalheri sagittalabdominaldiametershowsbettercorrelationwithcardiovascularriskfactorsthanwaistcircumferenceandbmi
AT deoliveiraerickprado sagittalabdominaldiametershowsbettercorrelationwithcardiovascularriskfactorsthanwaistcircumferenceandbmi