Cargando…

Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping indices, such as T1 time and partition coefficient (λ), have shown potential to assess diffuse myocardial fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate how scanner and field strength variation affect the accuracy and precision/r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raman, Fabio S, Kawel-Boehm, Nadine, Gai, Neville, Freed, Melanie, Han, Jing, Liu, Chia-Ying, Lima, Joao AC, Bluemke, David A, Liu, Songtao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-64
_version_ 1782279388033712128
author Raman, Fabio S
Kawel-Boehm, Nadine
Gai, Neville
Freed, Melanie
Han, Jing
Liu, Chia-Ying
Lima, Joao AC
Bluemke, David A
Liu, Songtao
author_facet Raman, Fabio S
Kawel-Boehm, Nadine
Gai, Neville
Freed, Melanie
Han, Jing
Liu, Chia-Ying
Lima, Joao AC
Bluemke, David A
Liu, Songtao
author_sort Raman, Fabio S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping indices, such as T1 time and partition coefficient (λ), have shown potential to assess diffuse myocardial fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate how scanner and field strength variation affect the accuracy and precision/reproducibility of T1 mapping indices. METHODS: CMR studies were performed on two 1.5T and three 3T scanners. Eight phantoms were made to mimic the T1/T2 of pre- and post-contrast myocardium and blood at 1.5T and 3T. T1 mapping using MOLLI was performed with simulated heart rate of 40-100 bpm. Inversion recovery spin echo (IR-SE) was the reference standard for T1 determination. Accuracy was defined as the percent error between MOLLI and IR-SE, and scan/re-scan reproducibility was defined as the relative percent mean difference between repeat MOLLI scans. Partition coefficient was estimated by ΔR1myocardium phantom/ΔR1blood phantom. Generalized linear mixed model was used to compare the accuracy and precision/reproducibility of T1 and λ across field strength, scanners, and protocols. RESULTS: Field strength significantly affected MOLLI T1 accuracy (6.3% error for 1.5T vs. 10.8% error for 3T, p<0.001) but not λ accuracy (8.8% error for 1.5T vs. 8.0% error for 3T, p=0.11). Partition coefficients of MOLLI were not different between two 1.5T scanners (47.2% vs. 47.9%, p=0.13), and showed only slight variation across three 3T scanners (49.2% vs. 49.8% vs. 49.9%, p=0.016). Partition coefficient also had significantly lower percent error for precision (better scan/re-scan reproducibility) than measurement of individual T1 values (3.6% for λ vs. 4.3%-4.8% for T1 values, approximately, for pre/post blood and myocardium values). CONCLUSION: Based on phantom studies, T1 errors using MOLLI ranged from 6-14% across various MR scanners while errors for partition coefficient were less (6-10%). Compared with absolute T1 times, partition coefficient showed less variability across platforms and field strengths as well as higher precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37336952013-08-06 Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners Raman, Fabio S Kawel-Boehm, Nadine Gai, Neville Freed, Melanie Han, Jing Liu, Chia-Ying Lima, Joao AC Bluemke, David A Liu, Songtao J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping indices, such as T1 time and partition coefficient (λ), have shown potential to assess diffuse myocardial fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate how scanner and field strength variation affect the accuracy and precision/reproducibility of T1 mapping indices. METHODS: CMR studies were performed on two 1.5T and three 3T scanners. Eight phantoms were made to mimic the T1/T2 of pre- and post-contrast myocardium and blood at 1.5T and 3T. T1 mapping using MOLLI was performed with simulated heart rate of 40-100 bpm. Inversion recovery spin echo (IR-SE) was the reference standard for T1 determination. Accuracy was defined as the percent error between MOLLI and IR-SE, and scan/re-scan reproducibility was defined as the relative percent mean difference between repeat MOLLI scans. Partition coefficient was estimated by ΔR1myocardium phantom/ΔR1blood phantom. Generalized linear mixed model was used to compare the accuracy and precision/reproducibility of T1 and λ across field strength, scanners, and protocols. RESULTS: Field strength significantly affected MOLLI T1 accuracy (6.3% error for 1.5T vs. 10.8% error for 3T, p<0.001) but not λ accuracy (8.8% error for 1.5T vs. 8.0% error for 3T, p=0.11). Partition coefficients of MOLLI were not different between two 1.5T scanners (47.2% vs. 47.9%, p=0.13), and showed only slight variation across three 3T scanners (49.2% vs. 49.8% vs. 49.9%, p=0.016). Partition coefficient also had significantly lower percent error for precision (better scan/re-scan reproducibility) than measurement of individual T1 values (3.6% for λ vs. 4.3%-4.8% for T1 values, approximately, for pre/post blood and myocardium values). CONCLUSION: Based on phantom studies, T1 errors using MOLLI ranged from 6-14% across various MR scanners while errors for partition coefficient were less (6-10%). Compared with absolute T1 times, partition coefficient showed less variability across platforms and field strengths as well as higher precision. BioMed Central 2013-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3733695/ /pubmed/23890156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-64 Text en Copyright © 2013 Raman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Raman, Fabio S
Kawel-Boehm, Nadine
Gai, Neville
Freed, Melanie
Han, Jing
Liu, Chia-Ying
Lima, Joao AC
Bluemke, David A
Liu, Songtao
Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners
title Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners
title_full Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners
title_fullStr Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners
title_full_unstemmed Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners
title_short Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners
title_sort modified look-locker inversion recovery t1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-64
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanfabios modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT kawelboehmnadine modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT gaineville modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT freedmelanie modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT hanjing modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT liuchiaying modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT limajoaoac modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT bluemkedavida modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners
AT liusongtao modifiedlooklockerinversionrecoveryt1mappingindicesassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilitybetweenmagneticresonancescanners