Cargando…

Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods

BACKGROUND: Health professionals and policymakers aspire to make healthcare decisions based on the entire relevant research evidence. This, however, can rarely be achieved because a considerable amount of research findings are not published, especially in case of ‘negative’ results - a phenomenon wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller, Katharina Felicitas, Meerpohl, Joerg J, Briel, Matthias, Antes, Gerd, Elm, Erik von, Lang, Britta, Gloy, Viktoria, Motschall, Edith, Schwarzer, Guido, Bassler, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-60
_version_ 1782279397426855936
author Mueller, Katharina Felicitas
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Briel, Matthias
Antes, Gerd
Elm, Erik von
Lang, Britta
Gloy, Viktoria
Motschall, Edith
Schwarzer, Guido
Bassler, Dirk
author_facet Mueller, Katharina Felicitas
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Briel, Matthias
Antes, Gerd
Elm, Erik von
Lang, Britta
Gloy, Viktoria
Motschall, Edith
Schwarzer, Guido
Bassler, Dirk
author_sort Mueller, Katharina Felicitas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health professionals and policymakers aspire to make healthcare decisions based on the entire relevant research evidence. This, however, can rarely be achieved because a considerable amount of research findings are not published, especially in case of ‘negative’ results - a phenomenon widely recognized as publication bias. Different methods of detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses have been described in the literature, such as graphical approaches and formal statistical tests to detect publication bias, and statistical approaches to modify effect sizes to adjust a pooled estimate when the presence of publication bias is suspected. An up-to-date systematic review of the existing methods is lacking. METHODS/DESIGN: The objectives of this systematic review are as follows: • To systematically review methodological articles which focus on non-publication of studies and to describe methods of detecting and/or quantifying and/or adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses. • To appraise strengths and weaknesses of methods, the resources they require, and the conditions under which the method could be used, based on findings of included studies. We will systematically search Web of Science, Medline, and the Cochrane Library for methodological articles that describe at least one method of detecting and/or quantifying and/or adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses. A dedicated data extraction form is developed and pilot-tested. Working in teams of two, we will independently extract relevant information from each eligible article. As this will be a qualitative systematic review, data reporting will involve a descriptive summary. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid 2013. This systematic review together with the results of other systematic reviews of the OPEN project (To Overcome Failure to Publish Negative Findings) will serve as a basis for the development of future policies and guidelines regarding the assessment and handling of publication bias in meta-analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37337392013-08-06 Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods Mueller, Katharina Felicitas Meerpohl, Joerg J Briel, Matthias Antes, Gerd Elm, Erik von Lang, Britta Gloy, Viktoria Motschall, Edith Schwarzer, Guido Bassler, Dirk Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Health professionals and policymakers aspire to make healthcare decisions based on the entire relevant research evidence. This, however, can rarely be achieved because a considerable amount of research findings are not published, especially in case of ‘negative’ results - a phenomenon widely recognized as publication bias. Different methods of detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses have been described in the literature, such as graphical approaches and formal statistical tests to detect publication bias, and statistical approaches to modify effect sizes to adjust a pooled estimate when the presence of publication bias is suspected. An up-to-date systematic review of the existing methods is lacking. METHODS/DESIGN: The objectives of this systematic review are as follows: • To systematically review methodological articles which focus on non-publication of studies and to describe methods of detecting and/or quantifying and/or adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses. • To appraise strengths and weaknesses of methods, the resources they require, and the conditions under which the method could be used, based on findings of included studies. We will systematically search Web of Science, Medline, and the Cochrane Library for methodological articles that describe at least one method of detecting and/or quantifying and/or adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses. A dedicated data extraction form is developed and pilot-tested. Working in teams of two, we will independently extract relevant information from each eligible article. As this will be a qualitative systematic review, data reporting will involve a descriptive summary. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid 2013. This systematic review together with the results of other systematic reviews of the OPEN project (To Overcome Failure to Publish Negative Findings) will serve as a basis for the development of future policies and guidelines regarding the assessment and handling of publication bias in meta-analyses. BioMed Central 2013-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3733739/ /pubmed/23885765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-60 Text en Copyright © 2013 Mueller et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Mueller, Katharina Felicitas
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Briel, Matthias
Antes, Gerd
Elm, Erik von
Lang, Britta
Gloy, Viktoria
Motschall, Edith
Schwarzer, Guido
Bassler, Dirk
Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
title Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
title_full Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
title_fullStr Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
title_full_unstemmed Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
title_short Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
title_sort detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-60
work_keys_str_mv AT muellerkatharinafelicitas detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT meerpohljoergj detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT brielmatthias detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT antesgerd detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT elmerikvon detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT langbritta detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT gloyviktoria detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT motschalledith detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT schwarzerguido detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods
AT basslerdirk detectingquantifyingandadjustingforpublicationbiasinmetaanalysesprotocolofasystematicreviewonmethods