Cargando…

Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models

BACKGROUND: The dynamics of gene regulation play a crucial role in a cellular control: allowing the cell to express the right proteins to meet changing needs. Some needs, such as correctly anticipating the day-night cycle, require complicated oscillatory features. In the analysis of gene regulatory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: St John, Peter C, Doyle, Francis J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-71
_version_ 1782279407886401536
author St John, Peter C
Doyle, Francis J
author_facet St John, Peter C
Doyle, Francis J
author_sort St John, Peter C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The dynamics of gene regulation play a crucial role in a cellular control: allowing the cell to express the right proteins to meet changing needs. Some needs, such as correctly anticipating the day-night cycle, require complicated oscillatory features. In the analysis of gene regulatory networks, mathematical models are frequently used to understand how a network’s structure enables it to respond appropriately to external inputs. These models typically consist of a set of ordinary differential equations, describing a network of biochemical reactions, and unknown kinetic parameters, chosen such that the model best captures experimental data. However, since a model’s parameter values are uncertain, and since dynamic responses to inputs are highly parameter-dependent, it is difficult to assess the confidence associated with these in silico predictions. In particular, models with complex dynamics - such as oscillations - must be fit with computationally expensive global optimization routines, and cannot take advantage of existing measures of identifiability. Despite their difficulty to model mathematically, limit cycle oscillations play a key role in many biological processes, including cell cycling, metabolism, neuron firing, and circadian rhythms. RESULTS: In this study, we employ an efficient parameter estimation technique to enable a bootstrap uncertainty analysis for limit cycle models. Since the primary role of systems biology models is the insight they provide on responses to rate perturbations, we extend our uncertainty analysis to include first order sensitivity coefficients. Using a literature model of circadian rhythms, we show how predictive precision is degraded with decreasing sample points and increasing relative error. Additionally, we show how this method can be used for model discrimination by comparing the output identifiability of two candidate model structures to published literature data. CONCLUSIONS: Our method permits modellers of oscillatory systems to confidently show that a model’s dynamic characteristics follow directly from experimental data and model structure, relaxing assumptions on the particular parameters chosen. Ultimately, this work highlights the importance of continued collection of high-resolution data on gene and protein activity levels, as they allow the development of predictive mathematical models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37337912013-08-06 Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models St John, Peter C Doyle, Francis J BMC Syst Biol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The dynamics of gene regulation play a crucial role in a cellular control: allowing the cell to express the right proteins to meet changing needs. Some needs, such as correctly anticipating the day-night cycle, require complicated oscillatory features. In the analysis of gene regulatory networks, mathematical models are frequently used to understand how a network’s structure enables it to respond appropriately to external inputs. These models typically consist of a set of ordinary differential equations, describing a network of biochemical reactions, and unknown kinetic parameters, chosen such that the model best captures experimental data. However, since a model’s parameter values are uncertain, and since dynamic responses to inputs are highly parameter-dependent, it is difficult to assess the confidence associated with these in silico predictions. In particular, models with complex dynamics - such as oscillations - must be fit with computationally expensive global optimization routines, and cannot take advantage of existing measures of identifiability. Despite their difficulty to model mathematically, limit cycle oscillations play a key role in many biological processes, including cell cycling, metabolism, neuron firing, and circadian rhythms. RESULTS: In this study, we employ an efficient parameter estimation technique to enable a bootstrap uncertainty analysis for limit cycle models. Since the primary role of systems biology models is the insight they provide on responses to rate perturbations, we extend our uncertainty analysis to include first order sensitivity coefficients. Using a literature model of circadian rhythms, we show how predictive precision is degraded with decreasing sample points and increasing relative error. Additionally, we show how this method can be used for model discrimination by comparing the output identifiability of two candidate model structures to published literature data. CONCLUSIONS: Our method permits modellers of oscillatory systems to confidently show that a model’s dynamic characteristics follow directly from experimental data and model structure, relaxing assumptions on the particular parameters chosen. Ultimately, this work highlights the importance of continued collection of high-resolution data on gene and protein activity levels, as they allow the development of predictive mathematical models. BioMed Central 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3733791/ /pubmed/23895261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-71 Text en Copyright © 2013 St. John and Doyle; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
St John, Peter C
Doyle, Francis J
Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models
title Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models
title_full Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models
title_fullStr Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models
title_full_unstemmed Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models
title_short Estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models
title_sort estimating confidence intervals in predicted responses for oscillatory biological models
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-71
work_keys_str_mv AT stjohnpeterc estimatingconfidenceintervalsinpredictedresponsesforoscillatorybiologicalmodels
AT doylefrancisj estimatingconfidenceintervalsinpredictedresponsesforoscillatorybiologicalmodels