Cargando…

Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance subxiphoid pericardial access and pericardiocentesis using off-the-shelf devices in swine

BACKGROUND: Needle access or drainage of pericardial effusion, especially when small, entails risk of bystander tissue injury or operator uncertainty about proposed trajectories. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) might allow enhanced imaging guidance. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used real-time CMR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halabi, Majdi, Faranesh, Anthony Z, Schenke, William H, Wright, Victor J, Hansen, Michael S, Saikus, Christina E, Kocaturk, Ozgur, Lederman, Robert J, Ratnayaka, Kanishka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-61
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Needle access or drainage of pericardial effusion, especially when small, entails risk of bystander tissue injury or operator uncertainty about proposed trajectories. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) might allow enhanced imaging guidance. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used real-time CMR to guide subxiphoid pericardial access in naïve swine using commercial 18G titanium puncture needles, which were exchanged for pericardial catheters. To test the value of CMR needle pericardiocentesis, we also created intentional pericardial effusions of a range of volumes, via a separate transvenous-transatrial catheter. We performed these procedures in 12 animals. Pericardiocentesis was performed in 2:47 ± 1:43 minutes; pericardial access was performed in 1:40 ± 4:34 minutes. The procedure was successful in all animals. Moderate and large effusions required only one needle pass. There were no complications, including pleural, hepatic or myocardial transit. CONCLUSIONS: CMR guided pericardiocentesis is attractive because the large field of view and soft tissue imaging depict global anatomic context in arbitrary planes, and allow the operator to plan trajectories that limit inadvertent bystander tissue injury. More important, CMR provides continuous visualization of the needle and target throughout the procedure. Using even passive needle devices, CMR enabled rapid pericardial needle access and drainage. We believe this experience supports clinical testing of real-time CMR guided needle access or drainage of the pericardial space. We suspect this would be especially helpful in “difficult” pericardial access, for example, in distorted thoracic anatomy or loculated effusion.