Cargando…

Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin

BACKGROUND: Salmon trypsin is shown to increase secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-8 from human airway epithelial cells through activation of PAR-2. Secretion of IL-8 induced by king crab trypsin is observed in a different concentration range compared to salmon trypsin, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, Anett K, Kristiansen, Kurt, Sylte, Ingebrigt, Seternes, Ole-Morten, Bang, Berit E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-281
_version_ 1782279415455023104
author Larsen, Anett K
Kristiansen, Kurt
Sylte, Ingebrigt
Seternes, Ole-Morten
Bang, Berit E
author_facet Larsen, Anett K
Kristiansen, Kurt
Sylte, Ingebrigt
Seternes, Ole-Morten
Bang, Berit E
author_sort Larsen, Anett K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Salmon trypsin is shown to increase secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-8 from human airway epithelial cells through activation of PAR-2. Secretion of IL-8 induced by king crab trypsin is observed in a different concentration range compared to salmon trypsin, and seems to be only partially related to PAR-2 activation. This report aim to identify differences in the molecular structure of king crab trypsin (Paralithodes camtschaticus) compared to salmon (Salmo salar) and bovine trypsin (Bos taurus) that might influence the ability to activate protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2). RESULTS: During purification king crab trypsin displayed stronger binding capacity to the anionic column used in fast protein liquid chromatography compared to fish trypsins, and was identified as a slightly bigger molecule. Measurements of enzymatic activity yielded no obvious differences between the trypsins tested. Molecular modelling showed that king crab trypsin has a large area with strong negative electrostatic potential compared to the smaller negative areas in bovine and salmon trypsins. Bovine and salmon trypsins also displayed areas with strong positive electrostatic potential, a feature lacking in the king crab trypsin. Furthermore we have identified 3 divergent positions (Asp(196), Arg(244), and Tyr(247)) located near the substrate binding pocket of king crab trypsin that might affect the binding and cleavage of PAR-2. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate that electrostatic interactions could be of importance in binding, cleavage and subsequent activation of PAR-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3733831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37338312013-08-06 Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin Larsen, Anett K Kristiansen, Kurt Sylte, Ingebrigt Seternes, Ole-Morten Bang, Berit E BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Salmon trypsin is shown to increase secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-8 from human airway epithelial cells through activation of PAR-2. Secretion of IL-8 induced by king crab trypsin is observed in a different concentration range compared to salmon trypsin, and seems to be only partially related to PAR-2 activation. This report aim to identify differences in the molecular structure of king crab trypsin (Paralithodes camtschaticus) compared to salmon (Salmo salar) and bovine trypsin (Bos taurus) that might influence the ability to activate protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2). RESULTS: During purification king crab trypsin displayed stronger binding capacity to the anionic column used in fast protein liquid chromatography compared to fish trypsins, and was identified as a slightly bigger molecule. Measurements of enzymatic activity yielded no obvious differences between the trypsins tested. Molecular modelling showed that king crab trypsin has a large area with strong negative electrostatic potential compared to the smaller negative areas in bovine and salmon trypsins. Bovine and salmon trypsins also displayed areas with strong positive electrostatic potential, a feature lacking in the king crab trypsin. Furthermore we have identified 3 divergent positions (Asp(196), Arg(244), and Tyr(247)) located near the substrate binding pocket of king crab trypsin that might affect the binding and cleavage of PAR-2. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate that electrostatic interactions could be of importance in binding, cleavage and subsequent activation of PAR-2. BioMed Central 2013-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3733831/ /pubmed/23870109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-281 Text en Copyright © 2013 Larsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Larsen, Anett K
Kristiansen, Kurt
Sylte, Ingebrigt
Seternes, Ole-Morten
Bang, Berit E
Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin
title Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin
title_full Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin
title_fullStr Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin
title_full_unstemmed Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin
title_short Differences in PAR-2 activating potential by king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (Salmo salar), and bovine (Bos taurus) trypsin
title_sort differences in par-2 activating potential by king crab (paralithodes camtschaticus), salmon (salmo salar), and bovine (bos taurus) trypsin
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-281
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenanettk differencesinpar2activatingpotentialbykingcrabparalithodescamtschaticussalmonsalmosalarandbovinebostaurustrypsin
AT kristiansenkurt differencesinpar2activatingpotentialbykingcrabparalithodescamtschaticussalmonsalmosalarandbovinebostaurustrypsin
AT sylteingebrigt differencesinpar2activatingpotentialbykingcrabparalithodescamtschaticussalmonsalmosalarandbovinebostaurustrypsin
AT seternesolemorten differencesinpar2activatingpotentialbykingcrabparalithodescamtschaticussalmonsalmosalarandbovinebostaurustrypsin
AT bangberite differencesinpar2activatingpotentialbykingcrabparalithodescamtschaticussalmonsalmosalarandbovinebostaurustrypsin