Cargando…
Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop the artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses for prediction modeling of cardiovascular autonomic (CA) dysfunction in the general population, and compare the prediction models using the two approaches. METHODS AND MATE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23940593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070571 |
_version_ | 1782279512278433792 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Zi-Hui Liu, Juanmei Zeng, Fangfang Li, Zhongtao Yu, Xiaoling Zhou, Linuo |
author_facet | Tang, Zi-Hui Liu, Juanmei Zeng, Fangfang Li, Zhongtao Yu, Xiaoling Zhou, Linuo |
author_sort | Tang, Zi-Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop the artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses for prediction modeling of cardiovascular autonomic (CA) dysfunction in the general population, and compare the prediction models using the two approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed a previous dataset based on a Chinese population sample consisting of 2,092 individuals aged 30–80 years. The prediction models were derived from an exploratory set using ANN and LR analysis, and were tested in the validation set. Performances of these prediction models were then compared. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that 14 risk factors showed statistically significant association with the prevalence of CA dysfunction (P<0.05). The mean area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.758 (95% CI 0.724–0.793) for LR and 0.762 (95% CI 0.732–0.793) for ANN analysis, but noninferiority result was found (P<0.001). The similar results were found in comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in the prediction models between the LR and ANN analyses. CONCLUSION: The prediction models for CA dysfunction were developed using ANN and LR. ANN and LR are two effective tools for developing prediction models based on our dataset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3734274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37342742013-08-12 Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis Tang, Zi-Hui Liu, Juanmei Zeng, Fangfang Li, Zhongtao Yu, Xiaoling Zhou, Linuo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop the artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses for prediction modeling of cardiovascular autonomic (CA) dysfunction in the general population, and compare the prediction models using the two approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed a previous dataset based on a Chinese population sample consisting of 2,092 individuals aged 30–80 years. The prediction models were derived from an exploratory set using ANN and LR analysis, and were tested in the validation set. Performances of these prediction models were then compared. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that 14 risk factors showed statistically significant association with the prevalence of CA dysfunction (P<0.05). The mean area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.758 (95% CI 0.724–0.793) for LR and 0.762 (95% CI 0.732–0.793) for ANN analysis, but noninferiority result was found (P<0.001). The similar results were found in comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in the prediction models between the LR and ANN analyses. CONCLUSION: The prediction models for CA dysfunction were developed using ANN and LR. ANN and LR are two effective tools for developing prediction models based on our dataset. Public Library of Science 2013-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3734274/ /pubmed/23940593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070571 Text en © 2013 Tang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tang, Zi-Hui Liu, Juanmei Zeng, Fangfang Li, Zhongtao Yu, Xiaoling Zhou, Linuo Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis |
title | Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of prediction model for cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction using artificial neural network and logistic regression analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23940593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangzihui comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis AT liujuanmei comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis AT zengfangfang comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis AT lizhongtao comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis AT yuxiaoling comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis AT zhoulinuo comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis |