Cargando…

Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop the artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses for prediction modeling of cardiovascular autonomic (CA) dysfunction in the general population, and compare the prediction models using the two approaches. METHODS AND MATE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Zi-Hui, Liu, Juanmei, Zeng, Fangfang, Li, Zhongtao, Yu, Xiaoling, Zhou, Linuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23940593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070571
_version_ 1782279512278433792
author Tang, Zi-Hui
Liu, Juanmei
Zeng, Fangfang
Li, Zhongtao
Yu, Xiaoling
Zhou, Linuo
author_facet Tang, Zi-Hui
Liu, Juanmei
Zeng, Fangfang
Li, Zhongtao
Yu, Xiaoling
Zhou, Linuo
author_sort Tang, Zi-Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop the artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses for prediction modeling of cardiovascular autonomic (CA) dysfunction in the general population, and compare the prediction models using the two approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed a previous dataset based on a Chinese population sample consisting of 2,092 individuals aged 30–80 years. The prediction models were derived from an exploratory set using ANN and LR analysis, and were tested in the validation set. Performances of these prediction models were then compared. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that 14 risk factors showed statistically significant association with the prevalence of CA dysfunction (P<0.05). The mean area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.758 (95% CI 0.724–0.793) for LR and 0.762 (95% CI 0.732–0.793) for ANN analysis, but noninferiority result was found (P<0.001). The similar results were found in comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in the prediction models between the LR and ANN analyses. CONCLUSION: The prediction models for CA dysfunction were developed using ANN and LR. ANN and LR are two effective tools for developing prediction models based on our dataset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3734274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37342742013-08-12 Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis Tang, Zi-Hui Liu, Juanmei Zeng, Fangfang Li, Zhongtao Yu, Xiaoling Zhou, Linuo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop the artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses for prediction modeling of cardiovascular autonomic (CA) dysfunction in the general population, and compare the prediction models using the two approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed a previous dataset based on a Chinese population sample consisting of 2,092 individuals aged 30–80 years. The prediction models were derived from an exploratory set using ANN and LR analysis, and were tested in the validation set. Performances of these prediction models were then compared. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that 14 risk factors showed statistically significant association with the prevalence of CA dysfunction (P<0.05). The mean area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.758 (95% CI 0.724–0.793) for LR and 0.762 (95% CI 0.732–0.793) for ANN analysis, but noninferiority result was found (P<0.001). The similar results were found in comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in the prediction models between the LR and ANN analyses. CONCLUSION: The prediction models for CA dysfunction were developed using ANN and LR. ANN and LR are two effective tools for developing prediction models based on our dataset. Public Library of Science 2013-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3734274/ /pubmed/23940593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070571 Text en © 2013 Tang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Zi-Hui
Liu, Juanmei
Zeng, Fangfang
Li, Zhongtao
Yu, Xiaoling
Zhou, Linuo
Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis
title Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis
title_full Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis
title_short Comparison of Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Using Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Analysis
title_sort comparison of prediction model for cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction using artificial neural network and logistic regression analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23940593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070571
work_keys_str_mv AT tangzihui comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis
AT liujuanmei comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis
AT zengfangfang comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis
AT lizhongtao comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis
AT yuxiaoling comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis
AT zhoulinuo comparisonofpredictionmodelforcardiovascularautonomicdysfunctionusingartificialneuralnetworkandlogisticregressionanalysis