Cargando…

The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct

Objective: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, adapted for children (PCS-C) by Crombez et al. (2003), was translated into German (SKS-D) and evaluated regarding its factorial structure, its reliability and validity. The association of catastrophizing with various pain characteristics and disability meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kröner-Herwig, Birgit, Maas, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23922617
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/psm000097
_version_ 1782279587320823808
author Kröner-Herwig, Birgit
Maas, Jennifer
author_facet Kröner-Herwig, Birgit
Maas, Jennifer
author_sort Kröner-Herwig, Birgit
collection PubMed
description Objective: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, adapted for children (PCS-C) by Crombez et al. (2003), was translated into German (SKS-D) and evaluated regarding its factorial structure, its reliability and validity. The association of catastrophizing with various pain characteristics and disability measures was examined as well as its association to neighboring constructs. Method: The paper-and-pencil version of the SKS-D was used in two different samples of children and adolescents. Analyses were conducted on a subgroup of participants from an epidemiological sample [n=898; age: M=12.9 (SD=1.4)] who had experienced monthly headaches in the 6-months period before and a clinical sample [n=60; age: M=12.6 (SD=0.8)] seeking treatment for recurrent headaches. Results: Exploratory factor analysis (PCA) suggested a one-factor model in contrast to the 3-factor model suggested by Crombez et al. (2003). The unidimensional scale showed distinct homogeneity and satisfying reliability. The clinical sample showed significantly higher scores than the epidemiological group. Also girls scored higher than boys. The catastrophizing explained a considerable amount of variance in pain and disability parameters in both samples thus underlining its validity. The psychological variables internalising, anxiety sensitivity and somatosensory amplification showed significant small to moderate associations with pain catastrophizing and also with pain and disability. After controlling for the above mentioned psychological variables, catastrophizing still yielded an independent contribution to the explanation of variance in pain and disability parameters. Conclusions: The PCS-C in its German form is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing catastrophizing in children with recurrent pain, in particular headache, in the age of 10–16 years. Pain catastrophizing is suggested to be assessed especially in pediatric pain patients as it is a significant moderator of pain and disability. In children with a distinct tendency to catastrophize cognitive restructuring should become a target of pediatric pain therapy, as a reduction of catastrophizing cognitions may indirectly help to ameliorate pain and disability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3734764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37347642013-08-06 The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct Kröner-Herwig, Birgit Maas, Jennifer Psychosoc Med Article Objective: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, adapted for children (PCS-C) by Crombez et al. (2003), was translated into German (SKS-D) and evaluated regarding its factorial structure, its reliability and validity. The association of catastrophizing with various pain characteristics and disability measures was examined as well as its association to neighboring constructs. Method: The paper-and-pencil version of the SKS-D was used in two different samples of children and adolescents. Analyses were conducted on a subgroup of participants from an epidemiological sample [n=898; age: M=12.9 (SD=1.4)] who had experienced monthly headaches in the 6-months period before and a clinical sample [n=60; age: M=12.6 (SD=0.8)] seeking treatment for recurrent headaches. Results: Exploratory factor analysis (PCA) suggested a one-factor model in contrast to the 3-factor model suggested by Crombez et al. (2003). The unidimensional scale showed distinct homogeneity and satisfying reliability. The clinical sample showed significantly higher scores than the epidemiological group. Also girls scored higher than boys. The catastrophizing explained a considerable amount of variance in pain and disability parameters in both samples thus underlining its validity. The psychological variables internalising, anxiety sensitivity and somatosensory amplification showed significant small to moderate associations with pain catastrophizing and also with pain and disability. After controlling for the above mentioned psychological variables, catastrophizing still yielded an independent contribution to the explanation of variance in pain and disability parameters. Conclusions: The PCS-C in its German form is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing catastrophizing in children with recurrent pain, in particular headache, in the age of 10–16 years. Pain catastrophizing is suggested to be assessed especially in pediatric pain patients as it is a significant moderator of pain and disability. In children with a distinct tendency to catastrophize cognitive restructuring should become a target of pediatric pain therapy, as a reduction of catastrophizing cognitions may indirectly help to ameliorate pain and disability. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2013-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3734764/ /pubmed/23922617 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/psm000097 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kröner-Herwig et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Kröner-Herwig, Birgit
Maas, Jennifer
The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct
title The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct
title_full The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct
title_fullStr The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct
title_full_unstemmed The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct
title_short The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct
title_sort german pain catastrophizing scale for children (pcs-c) – psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23922617
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/psm000097
work_keys_str_mv AT kronerherwigbirgit thegermanpaincatastrophizingscaleforchildrenpcscpsychometricanalysisandevaluationoftheconstruct
AT maasjennifer thegermanpaincatastrophizingscaleforchildrenpcscpsychometricanalysisandevaluationoftheconstruct
AT kronerherwigbirgit germanpaincatastrophizingscaleforchildrenpcscpsychometricanalysisandevaluationoftheconstruct
AT maasjennifer germanpaincatastrophizingscaleforchildrenpcscpsychometricanalysisandevaluationoftheconstruct