Cargando…

Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010

BACKGROUND: Countries of the Americas have been working towards rubella elimination since 2003 and endemic rubella virus transmission appears to have been interrupted since 2009. To contribute towards monitoring of rubella elimination, we assessed rubella seroprevalence among prenatal screening test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Gillian H, Harris, Tara, Desai, Shalini, Crowcroft, Natasha S, Mazzulli, Tony, Kozlowski, Tina, Deeks, Shelley L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3735453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-362
_version_ 1782279647130550272
author Lim, Gillian H
Harris, Tara
Desai, Shalini
Crowcroft, Natasha S
Mazzulli, Tony
Kozlowski, Tina
Deeks, Shelley L
author_facet Lim, Gillian H
Harris, Tara
Desai, Shalini
Crowcroft, Natasha S
Mazzulli, Tony
Kozlowski, Tina
Deeks, Shelley L
author_sort Lim, Gillian H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Countries of the Americas have been working towards rubella elimination since 2003 and endemic rubella virus transmission appears to have been interrupted since 2009. To contribute towards monitoring of rubella elimination, we assessed rubella seroprevalence among prenatal screening tests performed in Ontario. METHODS: Specimens received for prenatal rubella serologic testing at the Public Health Ontario Laboratory, the provincial reference laboratory, between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed. A patient-based dataset was created using all tests occurring among 15–49 year-old females, where prenatal screening was indicated. Multiple tests were assigned to the same patient on the basis of health card number, name and date of birth. Only unique tests performed at least nine months apart were included. SAS version 9.2 was used for analysis. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, we identified 459,963 women who underwent 551,160 unique prenatal screening tests for rubella. Of these, 81.6%, 17.1% and 1.4% had one, two and three or more tests respectively. Rubella immunity remained stable at approximately 90% overall; the proportion of susceptible women was 4.4%. Additionally, 0.6% of women were initially susceptible and subsequently developed immunity. Across the province, susceptibility was highest in the north and declined with increasing age (p < 0.0001). Among women with multiple tests, the proportion who remained susceptible declined as the number of years between tests increased (p < .0001). Based on age at first test, younger women had the highest susceptibility (4.2% among 15–19 year-olds) and were significantly more likely to develop immunity if previously susceptible (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Rubella susceptibility among prenatal women in Ontario supports elimination goals as population immunity in this group is relatively high. Higher susceptibility among young women and women living in the north highlights an opportunity for greater focus on identification and immunization of susceptible women in these groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3735453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37354532013-08-07 Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010 Lim, Gillian H Harris, Tara Desai, Shalini Crowcroft, Natasha S Mazzulli, Tony Kozlowski, Tina Deeks, Shelley L BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Countries of the Americas have been working towards rubella elimination since 2003 and endemic rubella virus transmission appears to have been interrupted since 2009. To contribute towards monitoring of rubella elimination, we assessed rubella seroprevalence among prenatal screening tests performed in Ontario. METHODS: Specimens received for prenatal rubella serologic testing at the Public Health Ontario Laboratory, the provincial reference laboratory, between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed. A patient-based dataset was created using all tests occurring among 15–49 year-old females, where prenatal screening was indicated. Multiple tests were assigned to the same patient on the basis of health card number, name and date of birth. Only unique tests performed at least nine months apart were included. SAS version 9.2 was used for analysis. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, we identified 459,963 women who underwent 551,160 unique prenatal screening tests for rubella. Of these, 81.6%, 17.1% and 1.4% had one, two and three or more tests respectively. Rubella immunity remained stable at approximately 90% overall; the proportion of susceptible women was 4.4%. Additionally, 0.6% of women were initially susceptible and subsequently developed immunity. Across the province, susceptibility was highest in the north and declined with increasing age (p < 0.0001). Among women with multiple tests, the proportion who remained susceptible declined as the number of years between tests increased (p < .0001). Based on age at first test, younger women had the highest susceptibility (4.2% among 15–19 year-olds) and were significantly more likely to develop immunity if previously susceptible (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Rubella susceptibility among prenatal women in Ontario supports elimination goals as population immunity in this group is relatively high. Higher susceptibility among young women and women living in the north highlights an opportunity for greater focus on identification and immunization of susceptible women in these groups. BioMed Central 2013-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3735453/ /pubmed/23914729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-362 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lim, Gillian H
Harris, Tara
Desai, Shalini
Crowcroft, Natasha S
Mazzulli, Tony
Kozlowski, Tina
Deeks, Shelley L
Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010
title Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010
title_full Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010
title_fullStr Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010
title_full_unstemmed Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010
title_short Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010
title_sort rubella immunity among prenatal women in ontario, 2006–2010
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3735453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23914729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-362
work_keys_str_mv AT limgillianh rubellaimmunityamongprenatalwomeninontario20062010
AT harristara rubellaimmunityamongprenatalwomeninontario20062010
AT desaishalini rubellaimmunityamongprenatalwomeninontario20062010
AT crowcroftnatashas rubellaimmunityamongprenatalwomeninontario20062010
AT mazzullitony rubellaimmunityamongprenatalwomeninontario20062010
AT kozlowskitina rubellaimmunityamongprenatalwomeninontario20062010
AT deeksshelleyl rubellaimmunityamongprenatalwomeninontario20062010