Cargando…
Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylob...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072350 |
_version_ | 1782279816056143872 |
---|---|
author | Marin, Clara Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia González-Bodi, Sara Marco-Jiménez, Francisco Vega, Santiago |
author_facet | Marin, Clara Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia González-Bodi, Sara Marco-Jiménez, Francisco Vega, Santiago |
author_sort | Marin, Clara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in free-living native (Emys orbicularis, n=83) and exotic ( Trachemys scripta elegans, n=117) turtles from 11 natural ponds in Eastern Spain. In addition, different types of samples (cloacal swabs, intestinal content and water from Turtle containers) were compared. Regardless of the turtle species, natural ponds where individuals were captured and the type of sample taken, Campylobacter was not detected. Salmonella was isolated in similar proportions in native (8.0±3.1%) and exotic (15.0±3.3%) turtles (p=0.189). The prevalence of Salmonella positive turtles was associated with the natural ponds where animals were captured. Captured turtles from 8 of the 11 natural ponds were positive, ranged between 3.0±3.1% and 60.0±11.0%. Serotyping revealed 8 different serovars among four Salmonella enterica subspecies: S. enterica subsp. enterica (n = 21), S. enterica subsp. salamae (n = 2), S. enterica subsp. diarizonae (n = 3), and S. enterica subsp. houtenae (n = 1). Two serovars were predominant: S. Thompson (n=16) and S . typhimurium (n=3). In addition, there was an effect of sample type on Salmonella detection. The highest isolation of Salmonella was obtained from intestinal content samples (12.0±3.0%), while lower percentages were found for water from the containers and cloacal swabs (8.0±2.5% and 3.0±1.5%, respectively). Our results imply that free-living turtles are a risk factor for Salmonella transmission, but do not seem to be a reservoir for Campylobacter . We therefore rule out turtles as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, further studies should be undertaken in other countries to confirm these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3737154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37371542013-08-15 Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter Marin, Clara Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia González-Bodi, Sara Marco-Jiménez, Francisco Vega, Santiago PLoS One Research Article Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in free-living native (Emys orbicularis, n=83) and exotic ( Trachemys scripta elegans, n=117) turtles from 11 natural ponds in Eastern Spain. In addition, different types of samples (cloacal swabs, intestinal content and water from Turtle containers) were compared. Regardless of the turtle species, natural ponds where individuals were captured and the type of sample taken, Campylobacter was not detected. Salmonella was isolated in similar proportions in native (8.0±3.1%) and exotic (15.0±3.3%) turtles (p=0.189). The prevalence of Salmonella positive turtles was associated with the natural ponds where animals were captured. Captured turtles from 8 of the 11 natural ponds were positive, ranged between 3.0±3.1% and 60.0±11.0%. Serotyping revealed 8 different serovars among four Salmonella enterica subspecies: S. enterica subsp. enterica (n = 21), S. enterica subsp. salamae (n = 2), S. enterica subsp. diarizonae (n = 3), and S. enterica subsp. houtenae (n = 1). Two serovars were predominant: S. Thompson (n=16) and S . typhimurium (n=3). In addition, there was an effect of sample type on Salmonella detection. The highest isolation of Salmonella was obtained from intestinal content samples (12.0±3.0%), while lower percentages were found for water from the containers and cloacal swabs (8.0±2.5% and 3.0±1.5%, respectively). Our results imply that free-living turtles are a risk factor for Salmonella transmission, but do not seem to be a reservoir for Campylobacter . We therefore rule out turtles as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, further studies should be undertaken in other countries to confirm these results. Public Library of Science 2013-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3737154/ /pubmed/23951312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072350 Text en © 2013 Marin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marin, Clara Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia González-Bodi, Sara Marco-Jiménez, Francisco Vega, Santiago Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter |
title | Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
|
title_full | Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
|
title_fullStr | Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
|
title_full_unstemmed | Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
|
title_short | Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
|
title_sort | free-living turtles are a reservoir for salmonella but not for campylobacter |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinclara freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter AT ingresacapaccionisofia freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter AT gonzalezbodisara freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter AT marcojimenezfrancisco freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter AT vegasantiago freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter |