Cargando…

Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter

Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marin, Clara, Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia, González-Bodi, Sara, Marco-Jiménez, Francisco, Vega, Santiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072350
_version_ 1782279816056143872
author Marin, Clara
Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia
González-Bodi, Sara
Marco-Jiménez, Francisco
Vega, Santiago
author_facet Marin, Clara
Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia
González-Bodi, Sara
Marco-Jiménez, Francisco
Vega, Santiago
author_sort Marin, Clara
collection PubMed
description Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in free-living native (Emys orbicularis, n=83) and exotic ( Trachemys scripta elegans, n=117) turtles from 11 natural ponds in Eastern Spain. In addition, different types of samples (cloacal swabs, intestinal content and water from Turtle containers) were compared. Regardless of the turtle species, natural ponds where individuals were captured and the type of sample taken, Campylobacter was not detected. Salmonella was isolated in similar proportions in native (8.0±3.1%) and exotic (15.0±3.3%) turtles (p=0.189). The prevalence of Salmonella positive turtles was associated with the natural ponds where animals were captured. Captured turtles from 8 of the 11 natural ponds were positive, ranged between 3.0±3.1% and 60.0±11.0%. Serotyping revealed 8 different serovars among four Salmonella enterica subspecies: S. enterica subsp. enterica (n = 21), S. enterica subsp. salamae (n = 2), S. enterica subsp. diarizonae (n = 3), and S. enterica subsp. houtenae (n = 1). Two serovars were predominant: S. Thompson (n=16) and S . typhimurium (n=3). In addition, there was an effect of sample type on Salmonella detection. The highest isolation of Salmonella was obtained from intestinal content samples (12.0±3.0%), while lower percentages were found for water from the containers and cloacal swabs (8.0±2.5% and 3.0±1.5%, respectively). Our results imply that free-living turtles are a risk factor for Salmonella transmission, but do not seem to be a reservoir for Campylobacter . We therefore rule out turtles as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, further studies should be undertaken in other countries to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3737154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37371542013-08-15 Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter Marin, Clara Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia González-Bodi, Sara Marco-Jiménez, Francisco Vega, Santiago PLoS One Research Article Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in free-living native (Emys orbicularis, n=83) and exotic ( Trachemys scripta elegans, n=117) turtles from 11 natural ponds in Eastern Spain. In addition, different types of samples (cloacal swabs, intestinal content and water from Turtle containers) were compared. Regardless of the turtle species, natural ponds where individuals were captured and the type of sample taken, Campylobacter was not detected. Salmonella was isolated in similar proportions in native (8.0±3.1%) and exotic (15.0±3.3%) turtles (p=0.189). The prevalence of Salmonella positive turtles was associated with the natural ponds where animals were captured. Captured turtles from 8 of the 11 natural ponds were positive, ranged between 3.0±3.1% and 60.0±11.0%. Serotyping revealed 8 different serovars among four Salmonella enterica subspecies: S. enterica subsp. enterica (n = 21), S. enterica subsp. salamae (n = 2), S. enterica subsp. diarizonae (n = 3), and S. enterica subsp. houtenae (n = 1). Two serovars were predominant: S. Thompson (n=16) and S . typhimurium (n=3). In addition, there was an effect of sample type on Salmonella detection. The highest isolation of Salmonella was obtained from intestinal content samples (12.0±3.0%), while lower percentages were found for water from the containers and cloacal swabs (8.0±2.5% and 3.0±1.5%, respectively). Our results imply that free-living turtles are a risk factor for Salmonella transmission, but do not seem to be a reservoir for Campylobacter . We therefore rule out turtles as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, further studies should be undertaken in other countries to confirm these results. Public Library of Science 2013-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3737154/ /pubmed/23951312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072350 Text en © 2013 Marin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marin, Clara
Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sofia
González-Bodi, Sara
Marco-Jiménez, Francisco
Vega, Santiago
Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
title Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
title_full Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
title_fullStr Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
title_full_unstemmed Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
title_short Free-Living Turtles Are a Reservoir for Salmonella but Not for Campylobacter
title_sort free-living turtles are a reservoir for salmonella but not for campylobacter
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072350
work_keys_str_mv AT marinclara freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT ingresacapaccionisofia freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT gonzalezbodisara freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT marcojimenezfrancisco freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT vegasantiago freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter