Cargando…
A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes
In this paper we introduce a new method to expressly use live/corporeal data in quantifying differences of time series data with an underlying limit cycle attractor; and apply it using an example of gait data. Our intention is to identify gait pattern differences between diverse situations and class...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071824 |
_version_ | 1782279825520590848 |
---|---|
author | Vieten, Manfred M. Sehle, Aida Jensen, Randall L. |
author_facet | Vieten, Manfred M. Sehle, Aida Jensen, Randall L. |
author_sort | Vieten, Manfred M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper we introduce a new method to expressly use live/corporeal data in quantifying differences of time series data with an underlying limit cycle attractor; and apply it using an example of gait data. Our intention is to identify gait pattern differences between diverse situations and classify them on group and individual subject levels. First we approximated the limit cycle attractors, from which three measures were calculated: δM amounts to the difference between two attractors (a measure for the differences of two movements), δD computes the difference between the two associated deviations of the state vector away from the attractor (a measure for the change in movement variation), and δF, a combination of the previous two, is an index of the change. As an application we quantified these measures for walking on a treadmill under three different conditions: normal walking, dual task walking, and walking with additional weights at the ankle. The new method was able to successfully differentiate between the three walking conditions. Day to day repeatability, studied with repeated trials approximately one week apart, indicated excellent reliability for δM (ICC(ave) > 0.73 with no differences across days; p > 0.05) and good reliability for δD (ICC(ave) = 0.414 to 0.610 with no differences across days; p > 0.05). Based on the ability to detect differences in varying gait conditions and the good repeatability of the measures across days, the new method is recommended as an alternative to expensive and time consuming techniques of gait classification assessment. In particular, the new method is an easy to use diagnostic tool to quantify clinical changes in neurological patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3737194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37371942013-08-15 A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes Vieten, Manfred M. Sehle, Aida Jensen, Randall L. PLoS One Research Article In this paper we introduce a new method to expressly use live/corporeal data in quantifying differences of time series data with an underlying limit cycle attractor; and apply it using an example of gait data. Our intention is to identify gait pattern differences between diverse situations and classify them on group and individual subject levels. First we approximated the limit cycle attractors, from which three measures were calculated: δM amounts to the difference between two attractors (a measure for the differences of two movements), δD computes the difference between the two associated deviations of the state vector away from the attractor (a measure for the change in movement variation), and δF, a combination of the previous two, is an index of the change. As an application we quantified these measures for walking on a treadmill under three different conditions: normal walking, dual task walking, and walking with additional weights at the ankle. The new method was able to successfully differentiate between the three walking conditions. Day to day repeatability, studied with repeated trials approximately one week apart, indicated excellent reliability for δM (ICC(ave) > 0.73 with no differences across days; p > 0.05) and good reliability for δD (ICC(ave) = 0.414 to 0.610 with no differences across days; p > 0.05). Based on the ability to detect differences in varying gait conditions and the good repeatability of the measures across days, the new method is recommended as an alternative to expensive and time consuming techniques of gait classification assessment. In particular, the new method is an easy to use diagnostic tool to quantify clinical changes in neurological patients. Public Library of Science 2013-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3737194/ /pubmed/23951252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071824 Text en © 2013 Vieten et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vieten, Manfred M. Sehle, Aida Jensen, Randall L. A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes |
title | A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes |
title_full | A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes |
title_fullStr | A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes |
title_short | A Novel Approach to Quantify Time Series Differences of Gait Data Using Attractor Attributes |
title_sort | novel approach to quantify time series differences of gait data using attractor attributes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vietenmanfredm anovelapproachtoquantifytimeseriesdifferencesofgaitdatausingattractorattributes AT sehleaida anovelapproachtoquantifytimeseriesdifferencesofgaitdatausingattractorattributes AT jensenrandalll anovelapproachtoquantifytimeseriesdifferencesofgaitdatausingattractorattributes AT vietenmanfredm novelapproachtoquantifytimeseriesdifferencesofgaitdatausingattractorattributes AT sehleaida novelapproachtoquantifytimeseriesdifferencesofgaitdatausingattractorattributes AT jensenrandalll novelapproachtoquantifytimeseriesdifferencesofgaitdatausingattractorattributes |