Cargando…
Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity
Protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) were originally characterized for CRISPR-Cas systems that were classified on the basis of their CRISPR repeat sequences. A few short 2–5 bp sequences were identified adjacent to one end of the protospacers. Experimental and bioinformatical results linked the motif...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Landes Bioscience
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403393 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.23764 |
_version_ | 1782279846987038720 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Shiraz A. Erdmann, Susanne Mojica, Francisco J.M. Garrett, Roger A. |
author_facet | Shah, Shiraz A. Erdmann, Susanne Mojica, Francisco J.M. Garrett, Roger A. |
author_sort | Shah, Shiraz A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) were originally characterized for CRISPR-Cas systems that were classified on the basis of their CRISPR repeat sequences. A few short 2–5 bp sequences were identified adjacent to one end of the protospacers. Experimental and bioinformatical results linked the motif to the excision of protospacers and their insertion into CRISPR loci. Subsequently, evidence accumulated from different virus- and plasmid-targeting assays, suggesting that these motifs were also recognized during DNA interference, at least for the recently classified type I and type II CRISPR-based systems. The two processes, spacer acquisition and protospacer interference, employ different molecular mechanisms, and there is increasing evidence to suggest that the sequence motifs that are recognized, while overlapping, are unlikely to be identical. In this article, we consider the properties of PAM sequences and summarize the evidence for their dual functional roles. It is proposed to use the terms protospacer associated motif (PAM) for the conserved DNA sequence and to employ spacer acqusition motif (SAM) and target interference motif (TIM), respectively, for acquisition and interference recognition sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3737346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Landes Bioscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37373462013-08-28 Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity Shah, Shiraz A. Erdmann, Susanne Mojica, Francisco J.M. Garrett, Roger A. RNA Biol Commentary Protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) were originally characterized for CRISPR-Cas systems that were classified on the basis of their CRISPR repeat sequences. A few short 2–5 bp sequences were identified adjacent to one end of the protospacers. Experimental and bioinformatical results linked the motif to the excision of protospacers and their insertion into CRISPR loci. Subsequently, evidence accumulated from different virus- and plasmid-targeting assays, suggesting that these motifs were also recognized during DNA interference, at least for the recently classified type I and type II CRISPR-based systems. The two processes, spacer acquisition and protospacer interference, employ different molecular mechanisms, and there is increasing evidence to suggest that the sequence motifs that are recognized, while overlapping, are unlikely to be identical. In this article, we consider the properties of PAM sequences and summarize the evidence for their dual functional roles. It is proposed to use the terms protospacer associated motif (PAM) for the conserved DNA sequence and to employ spacer acqusition motif (SAM) and target interference motif (TIM), respectively, for acquisition and interference recognition sites. Landes Bioscience 2013-05-01 2013-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3737346/ /pubmed/23403393 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.23764 Text en Copyright © 2013 Landes Bioscience http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Shah, Shiraz A. Erdmann, Susanne Mojica, Francisco J.M. Garrett, Roger A. Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity |
title | Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity |
title_full | Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity |
title_fullStr | Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity |
title_full_unstemmed | Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity |
title_short | Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity |
title_sort | protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403393 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.23764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahshiraza protospacerrecognitionmotifsmixedidentitiesandfunctionaldiversity AT erdmannsusanne protospacerrecognitionmotifsmixedidentitiesandfunctionaldiversity AT mojicafranciscojm protospacerrecognitionmotifsmixedidentitiesandfunctionaldiversity AT garrettrogera protospacerrecognitionmotifsmixedidentitiesandfunctionaldiversity |