Cargando…
Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychologica...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-368 |
_version_ | 1782279866937245696 |
---|---|
author | Laguë-Beauvais, Maude Gagnon, Christine Castonguay, Nathalie Bherer, Louis |
author_facet | Laguë-Beauvais, Maude Gagnon, Christine Castonguay, Nathalie Bherer, Louis |
author_sort | Laguë-Beauvais, Maude |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Neuropsychological test scores were also acquired. Furthermore, one of the known variables that can influence performances on neuropsychological tests is gender, which was added as a potential predictor. Results show that the small PRP group was associated with better performances in processing speed, inhibition, flexibility and working memory on neuropsychological tests. Gender also had an impact on the PRP, males having a lower PRP than females. A multiple regression was performed to determine which variables explained the most PRP duration, which showed that 49.1% of the variance of the PRP length could be explained by gender, reaction times of the PRP practice trials at the sixth session, the denomination and flexibility conditions of the Modified Stroop Task as well as results on the Symbol Search Test. Gender was the variable that explained the PRP variance the most (23%). Processing speed also seemed to be a great determinant of the PRP as well as the ability to alternate between task-sets as assessed by the Flexibility condition of the Modified Stroop Task. Thus, this study reveals that good performances on certain neuropsychological tests could predict one’s ease to manage two tasks simultaneously with a higher chance for males to perform better. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3737480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37374802013-08-08 Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period Laguë-Beauvais, Maude Gagnon, Christine Castonguay, Nathalie Bherer, Louis Springerplus Research The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Neuropsychological test scores were also acquired. Furthermore, one of the known variables that can influence performances on neuropsychological tests is gender, which was added as a potential predictor. Results show that the small PRP group was associated with better performances in processing speed, inhibition, flexibility and working memory on neuropsychological tests. Gender also had an impact on the PRP, males having a lower PRP than females. A multiple regression was performed to determine which variables explained the most PRP duration, which showed that 49.1% of the variance of the PRP length could be explained by gender, reaction times of the PRP practice trials at the sixth session, the denomination and flexibility conditions of the Modified Stroop Task as well as results on the Symbol Search Test. Gender was the variable that explained the PRP variance the most (23%). Processing speed also seemed to be a great determinant of the PRP as well as the ability to alternate between task-sets as assessed by the Flexibility condition of the Modified Stroop Task. Thus, this study reveals that good performances on certain neuropsychological tests could predict one’s ease to manage two tasks simultaneously with a higher chance for males to perform better. Springer International Publishing 2013-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3737480/ /pubmed/23961430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-368 Text en © Laguë-Beauvais et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Laguë-Beauvais, Maude Gagnon, Christine Castonguay, Nathalie Bherer, Louis Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period |
title | Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period |
title_full | Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period |
title_fullStr | Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period |
title_short | Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period |
title_sort | individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laguebeauvaismaude individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod AT gagnonchristine individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod AT castonguaynathalie individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod AT bhererlouis individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod |