Cargando…

Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period

The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laguë-Beauvais, Maude, Gagnon, Christine, Castonguay, Nathalie, Bherer, Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-368
_version_ 1782279866937245696
author Laguë-Beauvais, Maude
Gagnon, Christine
Castonguay, Nathalie
Bherer, Louis
author_facet Laguë-Beauvais, Maude
Gagnon, Christine
Castonguay, Nathalie
Bherer, Louis
author_sort Laguë-Beauvais, Maude
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Neuropsychological test scores were also acquired. Furthermore, one of the known variables that can influence performances on neuropsychological tests is gender, which was added as a potential predictor. Results show that the small PRP group was associated with better performances in processing speed, inhibition, flexibility and working memory on neuropsychological tests. Gender also had an impact on the PRP, males having a lower PRP than females. A multiple regression was performed to determine which variables explained the most PRP duration, which showed that 49.1% of the variance of the PRP length could be explained by gender, reaction times of the PRP practice trials at the sixth session, the denomination and flexibility conditions of the Modified Stroop Task as well as results on the Symbol Search Test. Gender was the variable that explained the PRP variance the most (23%). Processing speed also seemed to be a great determinant of the PRP as well as the ability to alternate between task-sets as assessed by the Flexibility condition of the Modified Stroop Task. Thus, this study reveals that good performances on certain neuropsychological tests could predict one’s ease to manage two tasks simultaneously with a higher chance for males to perform better.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3737480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37374802013-08-08 Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period Laguë-Beauvais, Maude Gagnon, Christine Castonguay, Nathalie Bherer, Louis Springerplus Research The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Neuropsychological test scores were also acquired. Furthermore, one of the known variables that can influence performances on neuropsychological tests is gender, which was added as a potential predictor. Results show that the small PRP group was associated with better performances in processing speed, inhibition, flexibility and working memory on neuropsychological tests. Gender also had an impact on the PRP, males having a lower PRP than females. A multiple regression was performed to determine which variables explained the most PRP duration, which showed that 49.1% of the variance of the PRP length could be explained by gender, reaction times of the PRP practice trials at the sixth session, the denomination and flexibility conditions of the Modified Stroop Task as well as results on the Symbol Search Test. Gender was the variable that explained the PRP variance the most (23%). Processing speed also seemed to be a great determinant of the PRP as well as the ability to alternate between task-sets as assessed by the Flexibility condition of the Modified Stroop Task. Thus, this study reveals that good performances on certain neuropsychological tests could predict one’s ease to manage two tasks simultaneously with a higher chance for males to perform better. Springer International Publishing 2013-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3737480/ /pubmed/23961430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-368 Text en © Laguë-Beauvais et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Laguë-Beauvais, Maude
Gagnon, Christine
Castonguay, Nathalie
Bherer, Louis
Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
title Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
title_full Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
title_fullStr Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
title_short Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
title_sort individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-368
work_keys_str_mv AT laguebeauvaismaude individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod
AT gagnonchristine individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod
AT castonguaynathalie individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod
AT bhererlouis individualdifferenceseffectsonthepsychologicalrefractoryperiod