Cargando…

Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma

INTRODUCTION: Radical surgery is the “gold standard” for treatment of invasive penile carcinoma but very poor aesthetic, functional and psychological outcomes have been reported. Our purpose was to assess the impact of organ potency-sparing surgery in locally confined carcinoma of the penis. MATERIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gulino, Gaetano, Sasso, Francesco, Palermo, Giuseppe, D’Onofrio, Alfonso, Racioppi, Marco, Sacco, Emilio, Pinto, Francesco, Antonucci, Michele, D’Addessi, Alessandro, Bassi, PierFrancesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956513
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.114033
_version_ 1782279889436540928
author Gulino, Gaetano
Sasso, Francesco
Palermo, Giuseppe
D’Onofrio, Alfonso
Racioppi, Marco
Sacco, Emilio
Pinto, Francesco
Antonucci, Michele
D’Addessi, Alessandro
Bassi, PierFrancesco
author_facet Gulino, Gaetano
Sasso, Francesco
Palermo, Giuseppe
D’Onofrio, Alfonso
Racioppi, Marco
Sacco, Emilio
Pinto, Francesco
Antonucci, Michele
D’Addessi, Alessandro
Bassi, PierFrancesco
author_sort Gulino, Gaetano
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radical surgery is the “gold standard” for treatment of invasive penile carcinoma but very poor aesthetic, functional and psychological outcomes have been reported. Our purpose was to assess the impact of organ potency-sparing surgery in locally confined carcinoma of the penis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively 42 patients with early penile cancer (Ta,T1,T2), treated with glandulectomy and glanduloplasty with urethral mucosa and sparing of cavernosal apexes, or glandulectomy and limited apical resection in cases of Stage T2. Sexual function, ejaculation and libido were evaluated with an IIEF-15 questionnaire before the appearance of neoplasia (about three months before the surgery) and six months after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated by the Bigelow-Young questionnaire. The scores relating to two weeks prior to the surgery have been compared to those obtained six months after surgery. The statistical analysis was conducted using t-Student for repeated measures and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Six months after surgery 73% of patients reported spontaneous rigid erections, 60% coital activity while 76% of the group treated with urethral glanduloplasty reported normal ejaculation and orgasm, regained an average of 35 days after surgery. The average IIEF-15 scores reported in the entire series in the domains of erection, libido and coital activity of the pre-cancer period were not statistically different than those recorded six months after surgery. In the group treated with glandular reconstruction, pre-and postoperative IIEF-15 mean scores related to ejaculation and orgasm domains were not significantly different. Mean scores of Bigelow-Young questionnaires related to sexual pleasure, familial, social and professional relationships showed significant improvement after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Potency sparing-sparing surgical treatments have a positive impact on a wide spectrum of the patient's life including family relationships, and social and working conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3737667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37376672013-08-16 Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma Gulino, Gaetano Sasso, Francesco Palermo, Giuseppe D’Onofrio, Alfonso Racioppi, Marco Sacco, Emilio Pinto, Francesco Antonucci, Michele D’Addessi, Alessandro Bassi, PierFrancesco Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Radical surgery is the “gold standard” for treatment of invasive penile carcinoma but very poor aesthetic, functional and psychological outcomes have been reported. Our purpose was to assess the impact of organ potency-sparing surgery in locally confined carcinoma of the penis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively 42 patients with early penile cancer (Ta,T1,T2), treated with glandulectomy and glanduloplasty with urethral mucosa and sparing of cavernosal apexes, or glandulectomy and limited apical resection in cases of Stage T2. Sexual function, ejaculation and libido were evaluated with an IIEF-15 questionnaire before the appearance of neoplasia (about three months before the surgery) and six months after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated by the Bigelow-Young questionnaire. The scores relating to two weeks prior to the surgery have been compared to those obtained six months after surgery. The statistical analysis was conducted using t-Student for repeated measures and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Six months after surgery 73% of patients reported spontaneous rigid erections, 60% coital activity while 76% of the group treated with urethral glanduloplasty reported normal ejaculation and orgasm, regained an average of 35 days after surgery. The average IIEF-15 scores reported in the entire series in the domains of erection, libido and coital activity of the pre-cancer period were not statistically different than those recorded six months after surgery. In the group treated with glandular reconstruction, pre-and postoperative IIEF-15 mean scores related to ejaculation and orgasm domains were not significantly different. Mean scores of Bigelow-Young questionnaires related to sexual pleasure, familial, social and professional relationships showed significant improvement after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Potency sparing-sparing surgical treatments have a positive impact on a wide spectrum of the patient's life including family relationships, and social and working conditions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3737667/ /pubmed/23956513 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.114033 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gulino, Gaetano
Sasso, Francesco
Palermo, Giuseppe
D’Onofrio, Alfonso
Racioppi, Marco
Sacco, Emilio
Pinto, Francesco
Antonucci, Michele
D’Addessi, Alessandro
Bassi, PierFrancesco
Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma
title Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma
title_full Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma
title_fullStr Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma
title_short Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma
title_sort sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956513
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.114033
work_keys_str_mv AT gulinogaetano sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT sassofrancesco sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT palermogiuseppe sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT donofrioalfonso sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT racioppimarco sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT saccoemilio sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT pintofrancesco sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT antonuccimichele sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT daddessialessandro sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma
AT bassipierfrancesco sexualoutcomesafterorganpotencysparingsurgeryandglansreconstructioninpatientswithpenilecarcinoma