Cargando…

Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective endourologic procedure which is less morbid than open surgery. However, pain around a nephrostomy tube requires good post-operative analgesia. We hypothesize that infiltration of local anesthetic with opioid from the renal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parikh, Geeta P., Shah, Veena R., Vora, Kalpana S., Modi, Manisha P., Mehta, Tanu, Sonde, Sumedha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956707
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.114046
_version_ 1782279893081391104
author Parikh, Geeta P.
Shah, Veena R.
Vora, Kalpana S.
Modi, Manisha P.
Mehta, Tanu
Sonde, Sumedha
author_facet Parikh, Geeta P.
Shah, Veena R.
Vora, Kalpana S.
Modi, Manisha P.
Mehta, Tanu
Sonde, Sumedha
author_sort Parikh, Geeta P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective endourologic procedure which is less morbid than open surgery. However, pain around a nephrostomy tube requires good post-operative analgesia. We hypothesize that infiltration of local anesthetic with opioid from the renal capsule to the skin around the nephrostomy tract under ultrasonic guidance would alleviate the postoperative pain for a long period. METHODS: A total of 60 ASA physical status I to II patients were selected for a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgeries. Patients were divided into group R (n=30) and group RM (n=30). Balanced general anesthesia was given. After completion of the surgical procedure, a 23-gauze spinal needle was inserted at 6 and 12 O’clock position under ultrasonic guidance up to renal capsule along the nephrostomy tube. A 10 ml drug solution was infiltrated in each tract while withdrawing from renal capsule to the skin. After extubation, the patient was shifted to the post-anesthesia care unit for 24 hours. Post-operative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and dynamic visual analog scale (DVAS) (during deep breathing and coughing) rating 0-10 for initial 24 hours. Rescue analgesia was given in the form of injection tramadol 1.0 mg/kg intravenously when VAS ≥4 and maximum up to 400 mg in 24 hours. Time to 1(st) rescue analgesic, number of doses of tramadol and total consumption of tramadol required in initial 24 hours were noted. Patients were observed for any side effect and treated accordingly. RESULTS: Time to 1(st) rescue analgesic, i.e., duration of analgesia in group RM is more prolonged than group R (P=0.0004). The number of doses of tramadol in 24 hours in group R were higher as compared to group RM (P=0.0003). The total amount of tramadol in 24 hours in group R was more than in group RM (P=0.0013). Side effects like nausea and vomiting and sedation were comparable in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of morphine to ropivacaine for nephrostomy tract infiltration significantly prolonged the duration of post-operative analgesia and reduced the number of doses and total consumption of rescue analgesic in initial 24 hours in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3737683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37376832013-08-16 Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance Parikh, Geeta P. Shah, Veena R. Vora, Kalpana S. Modi, Manisha P. Mehta, Tanu Sonde, Sumedha Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective endourologic procedure which is less morbid than open surgery. However, pain around a nephrostomy tube requires good post-operative analgesia. We hypothesize that infiltration of local anesthetic with opioid from the renal capsule to the skin around the nephrostomy tract under ultrasonic guidance would alleviate the postoperative pain for a long period. METHODS: A total of 60 ASA physical status I to II patients were selected for a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgeries. Patients were divided into group R (n=30) and group RM (n=30). Balanced general anesthesia was given. After completion of the surgical procedure, a 23-gauze spinal needle was inserted at 6 and 12 O’clock position under ultrasonic guidance up to renal capsule along the nephrostomy tube. A 10 ml drug solution was infiltrated in each tract while withdrawing from renal capsule to the skin. After extubation, the patient was shifted to the post-anesthesia care unit for 24 hours. Post-operative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and dynamic visual analog scale (DVAS) (during deep breathing and coughing) rating 0-10 for initial 24 hours. Rescue analgesia was given in the form of injection tramadol 1.0 mg/kg intravenously when VAS ≥4 and maximum up to 400 mg in 24 hours. Time to 1(st) rescue analgesic, number of doses of tramadol and total consumption of tramadol required in initial 24 hours were noted. Patients were observed for any side effect and treated accordingly. RESULTS: Time to 1(st) rescue analgesic, i.e., duration of analgesia in group RM is more prolonged than group R (P=0.0004). The number of doses of tramadol in 24 hours in group R were higher as compared to group RM (P=0.0003). The total amount of tramadol in 24 hours in group R was more than in group RM (P=0.0013). Side effects like nausea and vomiting and sedation were comparable in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of morphine to ropivacaine for nephrostomy tract infiltration significantly prolonged the duration of post-operative analgesia and reduced the number of doses and total consumption of rescue analgesic in initial 24 hours in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3737683/ /pubmed/23956707 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.114046 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parikh, Geeta P.
Shah, Veena R.
Vora, Kalpana S.
Modi, Manisha P.
Mehta, Tanu
Sonde, Sumedha
Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance
title Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance
title_full Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance
title_fullStr Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance
title_short Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance
title_sort analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956707
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.114046
work_keys_str_mv AT parikhgeetap analgesicefficacyofperitubalinfiltrationofropivacaineversusropivacaineandmorphineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyunderultrasonicguidance
AT shahveenar analgesicefficacyofperitubalinfiltrationofropivacaineversusropivacaineandmorphineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyunderultrasonicguidance
AT vorakalpanas analgesicefficacyofperitubalinfiltrationofropivacaineversusropivacaineandmorphineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyunderultrasonicguidance
AT modimanishap analgesicefficacyofperitubalinfiltrationofropivacaineversusropivacaineandmorphineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyunderultrasonicguidance
AT mehtatanu analgesicefficacyofperitubalinfiltrationofropivacaineversusropivacaineandmorphineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyunderultrasonicguidance
AT sondesumedha analgesicefficacyofperitubalinfiltrationofropivacaineversusropivacaineandmorphineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyunderultrasonicguidance