Cargando…

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study

BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus sheath provides anesthesia for surgery on the distal arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand. It has been found that evoked distal motor response or radial nerve-type motor response has influenced the success rate of single-injection infraclav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Dushyant, Srivastava, Nidhi, Pawar, Sudhir, Garg, Rakesh, Nagpal, Vijay Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956710
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.114054
_version_ 1782279893762965504
author Sharma, Dushyant
Srivastava, Nidhi
Pawar, Sudhir
Garg, Rakesh
Nagpal, Vijay Kumar
author_facet Sharma, Dushyant
Srivastava, Nidhi
Pawar, Sudhir
Garg, Rakesh
Nagpal, Vijay Kumar
author_sort Sharma, Dushyant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus sheath provides anesthesia for surgery on the distal arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand. It has been found that evoked distal motor response or radial nerve-type motor response has influenced the success rate of single-injection infraclavicular brachial plexus block. AIM: We conducted this study to compare the extent and effectiveness of infraclavicular brachial plexus block achieved by injecting a local anesthetic drug after finding specific muscle action due to neural stimulator guided posterior cord stimulation and lateral cord/medial cord stimulation. METHODS: After ethical committee approval, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study groups of 30 patients each. In group 1, posterior cord stimulation was used and in group 2 lateral/medial cord stimulation was used for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The extent of motor block and effectiveness of sensory block were assessed. RESULTS: All four motor nerves that were selected for the extent of block were blocked in 23 cases (76.7%) in group 1 and in 15 cases (50.0%) in group 2 (P:0.032). The two groups did not differ significantly in the number of cases in which 0, 1, 2, and 3 nerves were blocked (P>0.05). In group 1, significantly lesser number of patients had pain on surgical manipulation compared with patients of group 2 (P:0.037). CONCLUSION: Stimulating the posterior cord guided by a nerve stimulator before local anesthetic injection is associated with greater extent of block (in the number of motor nerves blocked) and effectiveness of block (in reporting no pain during the surgery) than stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3737686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37376862013-08-16 Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study Sharma, Dushyant Srivastava, Nidhi Pawar, Sudhir Garg, Rakesh Nagpal, Vijay Kumar Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus sheath provides anesthesia for surgery on the distal arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand. It has been found that evoked distal motor response or radial nerve-type motor response has influenced the success rate of single-injection infraclavicular brachial plexus block. AIM: We conducted this study to compare the extent and effectiveness of infraclavicular brachial plexus block achieved by injecting a local anesthetic drug after finding specific muscle action due to neural stimulator guided posterior cord stimulation and lateral cord/medial cord stimulation. METHODS: After ethical committee approval, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study groups of 30 patients each. In group 1, posterior cord stimulation was used and in group 2 lateral/medial cord stimulation was used for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The extent of motor block and effectiveness of sensory block were assessed. RESULTS: All four motor nerves that were selected for the extent of block were blocked in 23 cases (76.7%) in group 1 and in 15 cases (50.0%) in group 2 (P:0.032). The two groups did not differ significantly in the number of cases in which 0, 1, 2, and 3 nerves were blocked (P>0.05). In group 1, significantly lesser number of patients had pain on surgical manipulation compared with patients of group 2 (P:0.037). CONCLUSION: Stimulating the posterior cord guided by a nerve stimulator before local anesthetic injection is associated with greater extent of block (in the number of motor nerves blocked) and effectiveness of block (in reporting no pain during the surgery) than stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3737686/ /pubmed/23956710 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.114054 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Dushyant
Srivastava, Nidhi
Pawar, Sudhir
Garg, Rakesh
Nagpal, Vijay Kumar
Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study
title Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study
title_full Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study
title_fullStr Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study
title_full_unstemmed Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study
title_short Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study
title_sort infraclavicular brachial plexus block: comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956710
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.114054
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmadushyant infraclavicularbrachialplexusblockcomparisonofposteriorcordstimulationwithlateralormedialcordstimulationaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT srivastavanidhi infraclavicularbrachialplexusblockcomparisonofposteriorcordstimulationwithlateralormedialcordstimulationaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT pawarsudhir infraclavicularbrachialplexusblockcomparisonofposteriorcordstimulationwithlateralormedialcordstimulationaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT gargrakesh infraclavicularbrachialplexusblockcomparisonofposteriorcordstimulationwithlateralormedialcordstimulationaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy
AT nagpalvijaykumar infraclavicularbrachialplexusblockcomparisonofposteriorcordstimulationwithlateralormedialcordstimulationaprospectivedoubleblindedstudy