Cargando…

Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti

BACKGROUND: Wolbachia infections confer protection for their insect hosts against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, nematodes and the malaria parasite. A single mechanism that might explain this broad-based pathogen protection is immune priming, in which the presence of the symbiont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Yixin H., Woolfit, Megan, Rancès, Edwige, O'Neill, Scott L., McGraw, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002362
_version_ 1782476842783997952
author Ye, Yixin H.
Woolfit, Megan
Rancès, Edwige
O'Neill, Scott L.
McGraw, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Ye, Yixin H.
Woolfit, Megan
Rancès, Edwige
O'Neill, Scott L.
McGraw, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Ye, Yixin H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wolbachia infections confer protection for their insect hosts against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, nematodes and the malaria parasite. A single mechanism that might explain this broad-based pathogen protection is immune priming, in which the presence of the symbiont upregulates the basal immune response, preparing the insect to defend against subsequent pathogen infection. A study that compared natural Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster with the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti artificially transinfected with the same strains has suggested that innate immune priming may only occur in recent host-Wolbachia associations. This same study also revealed that while immune priming may play a role in viral protection it cannot explain the entirety of the effect. METHODOLOGY/FINDINGS: Here we assess whether the level of innate immune priming induced by different Wolbachia strains in A. aegypti is correlated with the degree of protection conferred against bacterial pathogens. We show that Wolbachia strains wMel and wMelPop, currently being tested for field release for dengue biocontrol, differ in their protective abilities. The wMelPop strain provides stronger, more broad-based protection than wMel, and this is likely explained by both the higher induction of immune gene expression and the strain-specific activation of particular genes. We also show that Wolbachia densities themselves decline during pathogen infection, likely as a result of the immune induction. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows a correlation between innate immune priming and bacterial protection phenotypes. The ability of the Toll pathway, melanisation and antimicrobial peptides to enhance viral protection or to provide the basis of malaria protection should be further explored in the context of this two-strain comparison. This work raises the questions of whether Wolbachia may improve the ability of wild mosquitoes to survive pathogen infection or alter the natural composition of gut flora, and thus have broader consequences for host fitness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3738474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37384742013-08-15 Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti Ye, Yixin H. Woolfit, Megan Rancès, Edwige O'Neill, Scott L. McGraw, Elizabeth A. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Wolbachia infections confer protection for their insect hosts against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, nematodes and the malaria parasite. A single mechanism that might explain this broad-based pathogen protection is immune priming, in which the presence of the symbiont upregulates the basal immune response, preparing the insect to defend against subsequent pathogen infection. A study that compared natural Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster with the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti artificially transinfected with the same strains has suggested that innate immune priming may only occur in recent host-Wolbachia associations. This same study also revealed that while immune priming may play a role in viral protection it cannot explain the entirety of the effect. METHODOLOGY/FINDINGS: Here we assess whether the level of innate immune priming induced by different Wolbachia strains in A. aegypti is correlated with the degree of protection conferred against bacterial pathogens. We show that Wolbachia strains wMel and wMelPop, currently being tested for field release for dengue biocontrol, differ in their protective abilities. The wMelPop strain provides stronger, more broad-based protection than wMel, and this is likely explained by both the higher induction of immune gene expression and the strain-specific activation of particular genes. We also show that Wolbachia densities themselves decline during pathogen infection, likely as a result of the immune induction. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows a correlation between innate immune priming and bacterial protection phenotypes. The ability of the Toll pathway, melanisation and antimicrobial peptides to enhance viral protection or to provide the basis of malaria protection should be further explored in the context of this two-strain comparison. This work raises the questions of whether Wolbachia may improve the ability of wild mosquitoes to survive pathogen infection or alter the natural composition of gut flora, and thus have broader consequences for host fitness. Public Library of Science 2013-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3738474/ /pubmed/23951381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002362 Text en © 2013 Ye et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ye, Yixin H.
Woolfit, Megan
Rancès, Edwige
O'Neill, Scott L.
McGraw, Elizabeth A.
Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
title Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
title_full Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
title_fullStr Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
title_full_unstemmed Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
title_short Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
title_sort wolbachia-associated bacterial protection in the mosquito aedes aegypti
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002362
work_keys_str_mv AT yeyixinh wolbachiaassociatedbacterialprotectioninthemosquitoaedesaegypti
AT woolfitmegan wolbachiaassociatedbacterialprotectioninthemosquitoaedesaegypti
AT rancesedwige wolbachiaassociatedbacterialprotectioninthemosquitoaedesaegypti
AT oneillscottl wolbachiaassociatedbacterialprotectioninthemosquitoaedesaegypti
AT mcgrawelizabetha wolbachiaassociatedbacterialprotectioninthemosquitoaedesaegypti