Cargando…
Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations
Interactive voice response (IVR) systems are computer programs, which interact with people to provide a number of services from business to health care. We examined the ability of an IVR system to administer and score a verbal fluency task (fruits) and the digit span forward and backward in 158 comm...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23950755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00107 |
_version_ | 1782476900278468608 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Delyana Ivanova Talbot, Vincent Gagnon, Michèle Messier, Claude |
author_facet | Miller, Delyana Ivanova Talbot, Vincent Gagnon, Michèle Messier, Claude |
author_sort | Miller, Delyana Ivanova |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interactive voice response (IVR) systems are computer programs, which interact with people to provide a number of services from business to health care. We examined the ability of an IVR system to administer and score a verbal fluency task (fruits) and the digit span forward and backward in 158 community dwelling people aged between 65 and 92 years of age (full scale IQ of 68–134). Only six participants could not complete all tasks mostly due to early technical problems in the study. Participants were also administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale fourth edition (WAIS-IV) and Wechsler Memory Scale fourth edition subtests. The IVR system correctly recognized 90% of the fruits in the verbal fluency task and 93–95% of the number sequences in the digit span. The IVR system typically underestimated the performance of participants because of voice recognition errors. In the digit span, these errors led to the erroneous discontinuation of the test: however the correlation between IVR scoring and clinical scoring was still high (93–95%). The correlation between the IVR verbal fluency and the WAIS-IV Similarities subtest was 0.31. The correlation between the IVR digit span forward and backward and the in-person administration was 0.46. We discuss how valid and useful IVR systems are for neuropsychological testing in the elderly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3738914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37389142013-08-15 Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations Miller, Delyana Ivanova Talbot, Vincent Gagnon, Michèle Messier, Claude Front Neurol Neuroscience Interactive voice response (IVR) systems are computer programs, which interact with people to provide a number of services from business to health care. We examined the ability of an IVR system to administer and score a verbal fluency task (fruits) and the digit span forward and backward in 158 community dwelling people aged between 65 and 92 years of age (full scale IQ of 68–134). Only six participants could not complete all tasks mostly due to early technical problems in the study. Participants were also administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale fourth edition (WAIS-IV) and Wechsler Memory Scale fourth edition subtests. The IVR system correctly recognized 90% of the fruits in the verbal fluency task and 93–95% of the number sequences in the digit span. The IVR system typically underestimated the performance of participants because of voice recognition errors. In the digit span, these errors led to the erroneous discontinuation of the test: however the correlation between IVR scoring and clinical scoring was still high (93–95%). The correlation between the IVR verbal fluency and the WAIS-IV Similarities subtest was 0.31. The correlation between the IVR digit span forward and backward and the in-person administration was 0.46. We discuss how valid and useful IVR systems are for neuropsychological testing in the elderly. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3738914/ /pubmed/23950755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00107 Text en Copyright © 2013 Miller, Talbot, Gagnon and Messier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Miller, Delyana Ivanova Talbot, Vincent Gagnon, Michèle Messier, Claude Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations |
title | Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations |
title_full | Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations |
title_fullStr | Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations |
title_full_unstemmed | Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations |
title_short | Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations |
title_sort | administration of neuropsychological tests using interactive voice response technology in the elderly: validation and limitations |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23950755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerdelyanaivanova administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations AT talbotvincent administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations AT gagnonmichele administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations AT messierclaude administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations |