Cargando…

Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations

Interactive voice response (IVR) systems are computer programs, which interact with people to provide a number of services from business to health care. We examined the ability of an IVR system to administer and score a verbal fluency task (fruits) and the digit span forward and backward in 158 comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Delyana Ivanova, Talbot, Vincent, Gagnon, Michèle, Messier, Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23950755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00107
_version_ 1782476900278468608
author Miller, Delyana Ivanova
Talbot, Vincent
Gagnon, Michèle
Messier, Claude
author_facet Miller, Delyana Ivanova
Talbot, Vincent
Gagnon, Michèle
Messier, Claude
author_sort Miller, Delyana Ivanova
collection PubMed
description Interactive voice response (IVR) systems are computer programs, which interact with people to provide a number of services from business to health care. We examined the ability of an IVR system to administer and score a verbal fluency task (fruits) and the digit span forward and backward in 158 community dwelling people aged between 65 and 92 years of age (full scale IQ of 68–134). Only six participants could not complete all tasks mostly due to early technical problems in the study. Participants were also administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale fourth edition (WAIS-IV) and Wechsler Memory Scale fourth edition subtests. The IVR system correctly recognized 90% of the fruits in the verbal fluency task and 93–95% of the number sequences in the digit span. The IVR system typically underestimated the performance of participants because of voice recognition errors. In the digit span, these errors led to the erroneous discontinuation of the test: however the correlation between IVR scoring and clinical scoring was still high (93–95%). The correlation between the IVR verbal fluency and the WAIS-IV Similarities subtest was 0.31. The correlation between the IVR digit span forward and backward and the in-person administration was 0.46. We discuss how valid and useful IVR systems are for neuropsychological testing in the elderly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3738914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37389142013-08-15 Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations Miller, Delyana Ivanova Talbot, Vincent Gagnon, Michèle Messier, Claude Front Neurol Neuroscience Interactive voice response (IVR) systems are computer programs, which interact with people to provide a number of services from business to health care. We examined the ability of an IVR system to administer and score a verbal fluency task (fruits) and the digit span forward and backward in 158 community dwelling people aged between 65 and 92 years of age (full scale IQ of 68–134). Only six participants could not complete all tasks mostly due to early technical problems in the study. Participants were also administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale fourth edition (WAIS-IV) and Wechsler Memory Scale fourth edition subtests. The IVR system correctly recognized 90% of the fruits in the verbal fluency task and 93–95% of the number sequences in the digit span. The IVR system typically underestimated the performance of participants because of voice recognition errors. In the digit span, these errors led to the erroneous discontinuation of the test: however the correlation between IVR scoring and clinical scoring was still high (93–95%). The correlation between the IVR verbal fluency and the WAIS-IV Similarities subtest was 0.31. The correlation between the IVR digit span forward and backward and the in-person administration was 0.46. We discuss how valid and useful IVR systems are for neuropsychological testing in the elderly. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3738914/ /pubmed/23950755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00107 Text en Copyright © 2013 Miller, Talbot, Gagnon and Messier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Miller, Delyana Ivanova
Talbot, Vincent
Gagnon, Michèle
Messier, Claude
Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations
title Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations
title_full Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations
title_fullStr Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations
title_full_unstemmed Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations
title_short Administration of Neuropsychological Tests Using Interactive Voice Response Technology in the Elderly: Validation and Limitations
title_sort administration of neuropsychological tests using interactive voice response technology in the elderly: validation and limitations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3738914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23950755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00107
work_keys_str_mv AT millerdelyanaivanova administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations
AT talbotvincent administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations
AT gagnonmichele administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations
AT messierclaude administrationofneuropsychologicaltestsusinginteractivevoiceresponsetechnologyintheelderlyvalidationandlimitations