Cargando…
Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis
We compared rotavirus detection rates in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and in healthy controls using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). We calculated rotavirus vaccine effectiveness using different laboratory-based case definiti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3739503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23876518 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1908.130461 |
_version_ | 1782476930670395392 |
---|---|
author | Tate, Jacqueline E. Mijatovic-Rustempasic, Slavica Tam, Ka Ian Lyde, Freda C. Payne, Daniel C. Szilagyi, Peter Edwards, Kathryn Staat, Mary Allen Weinberg, Geoffrey A. Hall, Caroline B. Chappell, James McNeal, Monica Gentsch, Jon R. Bowen, Michael D. Parashar, Umesh D. |
author_facet | Tate, Jacqueline E. Mijatovic-Rustempasic, Slavica Tam, Ka Ian Lyde, Freda C. Payne, Daniel C. Szilagyi, Peter Edwards, Kathryn Staat, Mary Allen Weinberg, Geoffrey A. Hall, Caroline B. Chappell, James McNeal, Monica Gentsch, Jon R. Bowen, Michael D. Parashar, Umesh D. |
author_sort | Tate, Jacqueline E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared rotavirus detection rates in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and in healthy controls using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). We calculated rotavirus vaccine effectiveness using different laboratory-based case definitions to determine which best identified the proportion of disease that was vaccine preventable. Of 648 AGE patients, 158 (24%) were EIA positive, and 157 were also qRT-PCR positive. An additional 65 (10%) were qRT-PCR positive but EIA negative. Of 500 healthy controls, 1 was EIA positive and 24 (5%) were qRT-PCR positive. Rotavirus vaccine was highly effective (84% [95% CI 71%–91%]) in EIA-positive children but offered no significant protection (14% [95% CI −105% to 64%]) in EIA-negative children for whom virus was detected by qRT-PCR alone. Children with rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR but not by EIA were not protected by vaccination, suggesting that rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR alone might not be causally associated with AGE in all patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3739503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37395032013-08-14 Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis Tate, Jacqueline E. Mijatovic-Rustempasic, Slavica Tam, Ka Ian Lyde, Freda C. Payne, Daniel C. Szilagyi, Peter Edwards, Kathryn Staat, Mary Allen Weinberg, Geoffrey A. Hall, Caroline B. Chappell, James McNeal, Monica Gentsch, Jon R. Bowen, Michael D. Parashar, Umesh D. Emerg Infect Dis Research We compared rotavirus detection rates in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and in healthy controls using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). We calculated rotavirus vaccine effectiveness using different laboratory-based case definitions to determine which best identified the proportion of disease that was vaccine preventable. Of 648 AGE patients, 158 (24%) were EIA positive, and 157 were also qRT-PCR positive. An additional 65 (10%) were qRT-PCR positive but EIA negative. Of 500 healthy controls, 1 was EIA positive and 24 (5%) were qRT-PCR positive. Rotavirus vaccine was highly effective (84% [95% CI 71%–91%]) in EIA-positive children but offered no significant protection (14% [95% CI −105% to 64%]) in EIA-negative children for whom virus was detected by qRT-PCR alone. Children with rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR but not by EIA were not protected by vaccination, suggesting that rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR alone might not be causally associated with AGE in all patients. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3739503/ /pubmed/23876518 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1908.130461 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Tate, Jacqueline E. Mijatovic-Rustempasic, Slavica Tam, Ka Ian Lyde, Freda C. Payne, Daniel C. Szilagyi, Peter Edwards, Kathryn Staat, Mary Allen Weinberg, Geoffrey A. Hall, Caroline B. Chappell, James McNeal, Monica Gentsch, Jon R. Bowen, Michael D. Parashar, Umesh D. Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis |
title | Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis |
title_full | Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis |
title_short | Comparison of 2 Assays for Diagnosing Rotavirus and Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness in Children with Gastroenteritis |
title_sort | comparison of 2 assays for diagnosing rotavirus and evaluating vaccine effectiveness in children with gastroenteritis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3739503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23876518 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1908.130461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tatejacquelinee comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT mijatovicrustempasicslavica comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT tamkaian comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT lydefredac comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT paynedanielc comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT szilagyipeter comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT edwardskathryn comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT staatmaryallen comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT weinberggeoffreya comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT hallcarolineb comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT chappelljames comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT mcnealmonica comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT gentschjonr comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT bowenmichaeld comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis AT parasharumeshd comparisonof2assaysfordiagnosingrotavirusandevaluatingvaccineeffectivenessinchildrenwithgastroenteritis |