Cargando…

Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Background: While it is known that elevated baseline intracardiac repolarization lability is associated with the risk of fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), the effect of its longitudinal changes on the risk of FVT/VF is unknown. Methods and Results: Near-field (NF) rig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guduru, Abhilash, Lansdown, Jason, Chernichenko, Daniil, Berger, Ronald D., Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00208
_version_ 1782476984695128064
author Guduru, Abhilash
Lansdown, Jason
Chernichenko, Daniil
Berger, Ronald D.
Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
author_facet Guduru, Abhilash
Lansdown, Jason
Chernichenko, Daniil
Berger, Ronald D.
Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
author_sort Guduru, Abhilash
collection PubMed
description Background: While it is known that elevated baseline intracardiac repolarization lability is associated with the risk of fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), the effect of its longitudinal changes on the risk of FVT/VF is unknown. Methods and Results: Near-field (NF) right ventricular (RV) intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) were recorded every 3–6 months at rest in 248 patients with structural heart disease [mean age 61.2 ± 13.3; 185(75%) male; 162(65.3%) ischemic cardiomyopathy] and implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) [201 (81%) primary prevention]. Intracardiac beat-to-beat QT variability index (QTVI(NF)) was measured on NF RV EGM. During the first study phase (median 18 months), participants made on average 2.4 visits. Then remote follow-up was continued for an additional median period of 3 years. Average QTVI(NF) did not change during the first year after ICD implantation (−0.342 ± 0.603 at baseline vs. −0.262 ± 0.552 at 6 months vs. −0.334 ± 0.603 at 12 months); however, it decreased thereafter (−0.510 ± 0.603 at 18 months; P = 0.042). Adjusted population-averaged GEE model showed that the odds of developing FVT/VF increased by 75% for each 1 unit increase in QTVI(NF). (OR 1.75 [95%CI 1.05–2.92]; P = 0.031). However, individual patient–specific QTVI(NF) trends (increasing, decreasing, flat) varied from patient to patient. For a given patient, the odds of developing FVT/VF were not associated with increasing or decreasing QTVI(NF) over time [OR 1.27; (95%CI 0.05–30.10); P = 0.881]. Conclusion: While on average the odds of FVT/VF increased with an increase in QTVI(NF), patient-specific longitudinal trends in QTVI(NF) did not affect the odds of FVT/VF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3740232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37402322013-08-20 Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Guduru, Abhilash Lansdown, Jason Chernichenko, Daniil Berger, Ronald D. Tereshchenko, Larisa G. Front Physiol Physiology Background: While it is known that elevated baseline intracardiac repolarization lability is associated with the risk of fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), the effect of its longitudinal changes on the risk of FVT/VF is unknown. Methods and Results: Near-field (NF) right ventricular (RV) intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) were recorded every 3–6 months at rest in 248 patients with structural heart disease [mean age 61.2 ± 13.3; 185(75%) male; 162(65.3%) ischemic cardiomyopathy] and implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) [201 (81%) primary prevention]. Intracardiac beat-to-beat QT variability index (QTVI(NF)) was measured on NF RV EGM. During the first study phase (median 18 months), participants made on average 2.4 visits. Then remote follow-up was continued for an additional median period of 3 years. Average QTVI(NF) did not change during the first year after ICD implantation (−0.342 ± 0.603 at baseline vs. −0.262 ± 0.552 at 6 months vs. −0.334 ± 0.603 at 12 months); however, it decreased thereafter (−0.510 ± 0.603 at 18 months; P = 0.042). Adjusted population-averaged GEE model showed that the odds of developing FVT/VF increased by 75% for each 1 unit increase in QTVI(NF). (OR 1.75 [95%CI 1.05–2.92]; P = 0.031). However, individual patient–specific QTVI(NF) trends (increasing, decreasing, flat) varied from patient to patient. For a given patient, the odds of developing FVT/VF were not associated with increasing or decreasing QTVI(NF) over time [OR 1.27; (95%CI 0.05–30.10); P = 0.881]. Conclusion: While on average the odds of FVT/VF increased with an increase in QTVI(NF), patient-specific longitudinal trends in QTVI(NF) did not affect the odds of FVT/VF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3740232/ /pubmed/23964242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00208 Text en Copyright © 2013 Guduru, Lansdown, Chernichenko, Berger and Tereshchenko. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Guduru, Abhilash
Lansdown, Jason
Chernichenko, Daniil
Berger, Ronald D.
Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_full Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_fullStr Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_short Longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_sort longitudinal changes in intracardiac repolarization lability in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00208
work_keys_str_mv AT guduruabhilash longitudinalchangesinintracardiacrepolarizationlabilityinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT lansdownjason longitudinalchangesinintracardiacrepolarizationlabilityinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT chernichenkodaniil longitudinalchangesinintracardiacrepolarizationlabilityinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT bergerronaldd longitudinalchangesinintracardiacrepolarizationlabilityinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT tereshchenkolarisag longitudinalchangesinintracardiacrepolarizationlabilityinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator