Cargando…

fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli

The orientation of a large grating can be decoded from V1 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, even at low resolution (3-mm isotropic voxels). This finding has suggested that columnar-level neuronal information might be accessible to fMRI at 3T. However, orientation decodability might...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alink, Arjen, Krugliak, Alexandra, Walther, Alexander, Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00493
_version_ 1782476987089027072
author Alink, Arjen
Krugliak, Alexandra
Walther, Alexander
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
author_facet Alink, Arjen
Krugliak, Alexandra
Walther, Alexander
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
author_sort Alink, Arjen
collection PubMed
description The orientation of a large grating can be decoded from V1 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, even at low resolution (3-mm isotropic voxels). This finding has suggested that columnar-level neuronal information might be accessible to fMRI at 3T. However, orientation decodability might alternatively arise from global orientation-preference maps. Such global maps across V1 could result from bottom-up processing, if the preferences of V1 neurons were biased toward particular orientations (e.g., radial from fixation, or cardinal, i.e., vertical or horizontal). Global maps could also arise from local recurrent or top-down processing, reflecting pre-attentive perceptual grouping, attention spreading, or predictive coding of global form. Here we investigate whether fMRI orientation decoding with 2-mm voxels requires (a) globally coherent orientation stimuli and/or (b) global-scale patterns of V1 activity. We used opposite-orientation gratings (balanced about the cardinal orientations) and spirals (balanced about the radial orientation), along with novel patch-swapped variants of these stimuli. The two stimuli of a patch-swapped pair have opposite orientations everywhere (like their globally coherent parent stimuli). However, the two stimuli appear globally similar, a patchwork of opposite orientations. We find that all stimulus pairs are robustly decodable, demonstrating that fMRI orientation decoding does not require globally coherent orientation stimuli. Furthermore, decoding remained robust after spatial high-pass filtering for all stimuli, showing that fine-grained components of the fMRI patterns reflect visual orientations. Consistent with previous studies, we found evidence for global radial and vertical preference maps in V1. However, these were weak or absent for patch-swapped stimuli, suggesting that global preference maps depend on globally coherent orientations and might arise through recurrent or top-down processes related to the perception of global form.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3740242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37402422013-08-20 fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli Alink, Arjen Krugliak, Alexandra Walther, Alexander Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus Front Psychol Psychology The orientation of a large grating can be decoded from V1 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, even at low resolution (3-mm isotropic voxels). This finding has suggested that columnar-level neuronal information might be accessible to fMRI at 3T. However, orientation decodability might alternatively arise from global orientation-preference maps. Such global maps across V1 could result from bottom-up processing, if the preferences of V1 neurons were biased toward particular orientations (e.g., radial from fixation, or cardinal, i.e., vertical or horizontal). Global maps could also arise from local recurrent or top-down processing, reflecting pre-attentive perceptual grouping, attention spreading, or predictive coding of global form. Here we investigate whether fMRI orientation decoding with 2-mm voxels requires (a) globally coherent orientation stimuli and/or (b) global-scale patterns of V1 activity. We used opposite-orientation gratings (balanced about the cardinal orientations) and spirals (balanced about the radial orientation), along with novel patch-swapped variants of these stimuli. The two stimuli of a patch-swapped pair have opposite orientations everywhere (like their globally coherent parent stimuli). However, the two stimuli appear globally similar, a patchwork of opposite orientations. We find that all stimulus pairs are robustly decodable, demonstrating that fMRI orientation decoding does not require globally coherent orientation stimuli. Furthermore, decoding remained robust after spatial high-pass filtering for all stimuli, showing that fine-grained components of the fMRI patterns reflect visual orientations. Consistent with previous studies, we found evidence for global radial and vertical preference maps in V1. However, these were weak or absent for patch-swapped stimuli, suggesting that global preference maps depend on globally coherent orientations and might arise through recurrent or top-down processes related to the perception of global form. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3740242/ /pubmed/23964251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00493 Text en Copyright © 2013 Alink, Krugliak, Walther and Kriegeskorte. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Alink, Arjen
Krugliak, Alexandra
Walther, Alexander
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli
title fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli
title_full fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli
title_fullStr fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli
title_full_unstemmed fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli
title_short fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli
title_sort fmri orientation decoding in v1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00493
work_keys_str_mv AT alinkarjen fmriorientationdecodinginv1doesnotrequireglobalmapsorgloballycoherentorientationstimuli
AT krugliakalexandra fmriorientationdecodinginv1doesnotrequireglobalmapsorgloballycoherentorientationstimuli
AT waltheralexander fmriorientationdecodinginv1doesnotrequireglobalmapsorgloballycoherentorientationstimuli
AT kriegeskortenikolaus fmriorientationdecodinginv1doesnotrequireglobalmapsorgloballycoherentorientationstimuli